Truth which does not follow the facts leads to folly.

The only thing that keeps [and has historically kept]
radical Islam from utter and complete chaos & mass
murder/butchery have been [and still are] all those
unconscionable dictators of the Muslim world which
the liberal West hates so much: Those so vicious and
wicked dictators are not possible in the West, of course,
and therefore the worst Islamic terror is now likely to
move almost exclusively into the West with the Muslim
immigrant population it has so imprudently brought in.
The West has become numb to terrorism: Despite the
"outcry" that we hear after each act of Islamic terror
nowadays, the truth is that we long ago decided to
accept the acts of terror perpetrated by the Muslim
communities among us as inevitable & intractable to
any & all remedies and solutions (the equivalent of
deciding we can't really do anything to prevent them
outside of eliminating the Muslims themselves). We
likewise talk about the weather, but "we can't really do
anything about it" so we buy umbrellas and pretend
that by hiding under them we have conquered the rain.

Islamic terrorism is never the result of socioeconomic
issues: Muslims from every economic status, from the
poorest to the wealthiest, and every social station
from the illiterate to scholars, princes, have engaged
in Islamic terrorism. Doctors, lawyers, and indian
chiefs. No one secular "socioeconomic solution" can
address a problem which stems solely/entirely from a
purely religious duty--And as you can imagine, if you
eliminate the religion of a Muslim you eliminate the
Muslim, so the West has decided it is not going to
eliminate the Muslim even by trying to eliminate his
religion. Therefore, no matter the "outrage" we may
express over Islamic acts of terror, the truth is that
we have decided to just become senseless to them:

And so after every such act of Islamic terror the first
order of business is to praise Muslims and exculpate
the religion of Islam, even when we KNOW that there is
no other cause for the terror. Insane people sometimes
do cause great acts of mass murder; we live with an
almost endless supply of serial killers, murderers, and
political socioeconomic revolutionaries also cause a
lot of senseless butchery... but they all have causes
which can be addressed as directly as we would a war
with a foreign power: Kill that cause and we have won
the issue, be it communism, national socialism, disease
and insanity, gangsterism or revolution. But Islamic
terrorism is the result of the Muslims' religion, and
apparently we are not [yet] ready to try to beat down
a "major religion" just to stop its acts of terror against
us. And so we anesthetize ourselves to them rather
than attempt to try to eliminate them once & for all.

Muslims do not become terrorists if we give them job
opportunities and trust them with care in this world:
Truth or prejudice? As well: The Palestinian issue is
a red herring used by the apologists and promoters of
Islamic Terror to muddy up the waters. The reality:

"It would be mean to keep pious Muslims from the only
way the Koran tells them they can ascend directly to
their Paradise: by dying while butchering non-Muslims
in the name of Allah." And you can't claim to be for
religious freedom and then try to keep pious Muslims
from going to Paradise in accordance with their religious
beliefs & dictums, now can you! So make up your mind:

If you're going to be tolerant of Muslims you must be
tolerant of the Muslims' religious beliefs and accept
a few acts of mass murder, butchery, and terror here
and there. [To paraphrase the lever-headed scientist
in that great movie The Thing: "We owe it to political
correctness for a few of us to stand here and be killed
by The Monster!" I guess.]   S D Rodrian
If I have expressed any racist opinions, fine: Point
them out and I will condemn them; as I have always
condemned all expressions of racism no matter where
they might be coming from. I believe that, unless they
are advocating violence, everyone has a right in this
country to express his/her even most racist opinions.
But every person also has a right here to condemn
anyone's racist opinions, and that also includes me.
Note that because Islam was designed as the by-rules
of a gang of cut-throats, rapists, slave-traders, and
... it cannot therefore in its purest expression
perform as the by-rules of any societal form other
than that of a gang of thieves & murderers... which
means that most self-styled Islamic societies you see
"functioning" around the world today (as well as
historically) must "conveniently" ignore most (or at
least a great many) of the Quranic by-laws to govern
their societies however inefficiently. Of course, this
(and worse) can work for a while regardless of the
fact that none of these so-called Islamic societies
have ever been and none now are truly democratic
(responsive to the will of the governed): As Islamic
societies can only function as tyrannies, their one
heresy therefore is democracy itself, which could also
be termed "secularism," since "democratic rule" is
incompatible with "religious rule" (no matter what
anybody, good person or evil, tells you):

These self-styled Islamic societies "function" (that
is) until some ignoramus in them points out that their
society is only "living up" to the Islamic Ideals in
name only... and then ISIS and Boko Haram. Saudi
Arabia & the Gulf Arabs
have used the treasures they
have found in petroleum to create for themselves a
"very nearly Islamic" societal form which does not
depend on the Quranic gang mechanisms to prosper
(oil frees the Gulf Arabs from having to engage in
piracy & waylaying, in the trading of stolen goods &
slaves to fatten their coffers). And they also don't
have to rely on the normal forms of wealth-creation
which all modern civilizations require in order to
survive and thrive, leaving them free to promote the
myth that the purest forms of Islam ARE able to
sustain a modern society after all--A myth which no
doubt will meet reality once the petroleum model
falters, but a myth which meanwhile condemns those
societies that may believe them to be true... to create
impossible monstrosities like ISIS and Boko Haram.

Mustafa Kemal understood this and tried to make Turkey
into a modern secular state (with a measure of success
by the way). While Recep Tayyip Erdogan is that quite
unfortunate ignoramus who raises a quirky, ugly voice
to point out to an Islamic population that their state
is not living up to their Islamic Ideals... with great
success, of course, as well as predictably disastrous
results--So we watch the once great state that Mustafa
Kemal created slowly devouring itself bit by bit and
return to the Dark Ages from which it tried to escape.
Mohammed designed Islam specifically to condone and
to excuse, to absolve and to forgive clear manifest and
unambiguous criminal behavior: Islam is ALMOST ALL
exclusively about the vile pretense that God approves
and is "made joyful" by all of the butchery and murder,
torture & rape & mayhem that is promoted in the Koran

"We are Americans, and Americans do not discriminate
against religion, against any religion." So they say.

But what if a criminal organization invents a religion
which protects them against such "discrimination"
against their criminality: does it then become immune
to the reach of law because it is now ALSO a religion?

I don't want the government to discriminate against
Muslims BECAUSE of their religiosity (let the Muslims
believe whatever the Hell they like
). But I certainly
do absolutely want the government to look into any
actual criminality Muslims might be engaging in, or
being advised to engage in (because the promoting
of crime is itself a crime even in the absence of that
crime having taken place). Therefore, if Muslims do
not want to be investigated for criminality let them
expunge all the promotion of crime from the Koran.

You are not going to stop these terrorist acts until
you stop their incitement & promotion, their extolling
and eulogizing, and the glorifying of them... which is
what the Koran now does & will do until WE stop it.

When you already believe that your quickest path to
Heaven is butchering people of a different religion...
it most probably takes less of a push to make you do
it than it would take to push {somebody who believes
that killing anyone is the worst sin God punishes} to it.

Therefore let me live amongst the latter believers and
never amongst the former. For, think what you will, no
matter how much they might care for me... people who
can so easily be "nudged" to kill me ALWAYS will be a
great & present danger to me. And so therefore: It will
always be far safer by far to be hated by your Christian
neighbors than to be loved by your Muslim ones.

If religious beliefs go against the law, then I say
that their believers should be prosecuted for them,
and that they should be prosecuted LONG BEFORE
all such continuous promotion of criminality actually
results in the actual committing of any crimes at all.

Should we also prosecute Christians for any beliefs
which also promote crime? Absolutely! And right now:
The sooner, the quicker done the better off we'll be.
A few interesting notes worth reading:

They left Islam and now tour the US to talk about it

Ex-Muslims explain reasons why they left faith

Ignore Islam, 'ex-Muslims' urge

It’s about time we listened to those speaking honestly
about Islam

Satellite images show the horrifying extent of China’s
cultural genocide of Uighurs

Curb Your Enthusiasm Department: The Uighurs are being
taught to be Chinese, not butchered en masse like the
Jews, for Heavens' sakes! Yes, the best solution would
have probably been to create a separate homeland just
for the Uighurs only. But that wasn't going to happen:
Islamic attacks on non-Muslims have been occurring in
China almost on the same level as those in Israel (and
everywhere else there is a non-Muslim culture next to
an Islamic one) which most obviously makes the Chinese
[mass re-education] solution to their Islamic Uighur
problem one of the least bloody one: All societies,
including every last single Western one has provisions
for obligatory public education about regarding its culture
far above all the others in order that its citizenry grows
up believing that theirs is the preferred culture from all
the other cultures in the world. In a decade or two the
Uighurs will probably be as Chinese as are everyone else
in China. And then cultural clashes in China will come to
an end without having a repeat of the German Nazi
Holocaust there. And the Uighurs will be as defensive
(and jingoistic) about "their Chinese culture" as the rest
of the other Chinese are now. So patience please.

Would I have been as acquiescent if the German Nazis
had re-educated the Jews en masse and made them all
loyal Nazi Aryans? [Well, I'm not so much acquiescent
as realistic.] But I don't remember the German Jews
staging any attacks against their fellow non-Jewish
German neighbors. Perhaps you know of some. So, no:
That would have been an uncalled-for utterly needless
unprovoked cultural crime against the Jews. The
Chinese case is a bit more complicated. Just as is the
case with the Myanmar Rohingya Muslims:

If someone is attacking you without any provocation I
might come to your defense at once. But if you have a
history of blowing up the guy's house & killing his
family members, I may not be as quick to hit him with
a brick or shoot him if I see him coming after you. Sorry.
What’s happening in Xinjiang is genocide

"911. What's your emergency?"

"My husband and I just had an argument
and he's committing genocide on me..."

     [The devaluing of the word.]

"... new evidence has surfaced that China has also
imposed on the Uighurs a form of demographic genocide
with forced sterilizations and other measures aimed at
reducing the population..."

China has been reducing its entire population for
decades, but only now that its Muslim minority is
also coming under such laws are we hearing that
they are genocide?!

"China is systematically using pregnancy checks,
forced intrauterine devices, sterilization and even
abortion to reduce the population of Uighurs and
other Muslims in Xinjiang. Moreover, having too many
children is being punished by incarceration in the camps."

Where was the world when China began these practices
on its entire population decades ago? If it wasn't
genocide then, why is it genocide now? I wonder what
has changed 'our' so moral point of view?
Biden appears to accuse Russia of genocide in Ukraine

Unlike that case with the Chinese Uyghurs, I agree with
Biden that Russia has indisputably committed and is
continuing to commit genocide in Ukraine.

When we use the genocide tag incorrectly we not only
deminish its meaning but we demean the very victims
whom we are trying to help with its use. Use it wisely! Because
it is a term which unfortunately will be needed in the future.

Russia-Ukraine war: 21,000 civilians killed, Mayor of
Mariupol estimates

Syrians and other Muslim refugees are no less worthy of
rescue than are Cubans and Ukrainians. But what the world
should have done in the Middle East is what it is now doing
in Ukraine--not only whenever and wherever possible to help
them militarily to win in their homeland but, at least, to create 'safe places' for them 'there' so that their sudden injection into
places where they are not really going to be welcome because
of social & other societal incompatibilities (especially in religion)
does not cause the dire upheavals which bad actors originally
designed waves of fleeing refugees to cause their enemies: Yes,
I know that in many places/cases in the Middle East (like Syria
and Iraq) matters are extremely complex and that there many
civilian refugee groups are in fact the families of one's enemy
combatants; but they all still deserve the world's protection (as
well as to be sequestered away from direct hostilities if only for the defence of everyone's human rights)... and most of all so that
their ever-growing numbers are not used as a weapon of war
(like Putin was attempting to do in using Ukrainian refugees to
'break the back' of NATO host nations like Poland). Note how
millions of recent Ukrainians refugees are now slowly trickling
back to their own country there.
Whoever is guilty of the horrors the several Muslim
minorities are experiencing I neither excuse it nor
condone it--and even if the Rohingya, the Palestinians
and the Uighurs are themselves 100% guilty for what's
happening to them I neither excuse it nor condone it
--But I am always interested in trying to determine (to
understand) why it's happening. One thing is sure:
Even after all the horrors the Palestinian Muslim have
put the Israeli Jews through (beginning long before
1948) the Israeli Jews still to this day would like
nothing better than that the Palestinians rejoin the
human race and reach a permanent peaceful settlement
with them. But it's not happening (and likely will
never happen) because the Palestinian Muslims are
enslaved by a religious mindset that tells them God
commands them to butcher every Jew they can get their
hands on! This is self-evidently incomprehensible [to
me]; but all religious cults live by incomprehensible
dictates from which most members of Western (modern
secular) societies have long ago freed themselves.

Even so this wondrous Israeli Jewish self-restrain
when it comes to Palestinians who are en mass
brainwashed [into the belief that God put them on this
earth to murder Jews] is really more than I could
bear, as a human being (and much like the Myanmar
Buddhists, the Chinese, the Spanish before Columbus,
and perhaps the Indian Hindus now) this is really
something I don't believe I myself would be so willing
to accept with the Jews' seemingly infinite patience.

I am neither a Jew nor an Israeli and therefore I am
forever humbled by the Israeli Jews' willingness to
patiently await the Palestinians recovering their
humanity like that. No. Long, long ago I would have
removed them as Arab squatters on the historic lands
of the Jews--to Jordan and Egypt probably, even though
most Palestinians are ethnically not Arabs at all but
forcibly converted Jews and most Arab societies would
never accept them as Arabs--And maybe this is the
reason the Israeli Jews are so patient with the
Palestinians after all: That forlorn hope that they
recover their senses and return to their brethren.
If one is accused of justifying or even of advocating
genocide simply because of warning against situations
which might lead to it (by those who disingenuously
believe that merely denouncing genocide everywhere
every time was always enough to prevent it) then
that's the price one must pay: Such 'decent' accusers
have been denouncing genocide all along... and not
mostly doing much more than that. And yet we all know
the history of the world up to now: all their wondrous
self-righteous denunciations have allways all been
after the fact.

Conquest for acquisition has been mass murder as well,
but it's brief & passing, however bloody. [Who out
there thinks that I am advocating it now?] While the
intractable hatreds towards other religions inherent in
every religion never really do go away no matter how
they may be temporarily papered over. It is religion,
rather than conquest for acquisition, which has been
the main cause of genocide in our human history.
Religion has always united peoples... against each
other. And if you can't see that then you will see a
lot more genocide in the future.

Hate me for pointing it out if you like. But facts
don't change just because people may shift position
and see them in a new light: People simply move from
the light into the darkness, and only hopefully back
again. It's easy to be brainwashed into believing that
if a friend or even a mere acquaintance is enamored of
some evil... that such an evil has turned into virtue.
But that is never so. The truth is that we live in the
shadows, never quite knowing whether we're walking
towards the light or towards our darkest steps again.
But, whichever way we go, the landscape remains the

We must always look to the lessons of history to learn
what history has to teach us going forward. If I am
accused of 'justifying genocide' because I have said
that not throwing two peoples which hate each other
together to force them to learn to live as brothers is
a good & reasonable thing, I would like to point out
to my accusers that they themselves might never think
that forcing two persons who hate each other to move
into the same house to learn to live as brothers would
be a good & reasonable thing. Better, a million times
better, to contemplate so-called 'cultural genocide'
than the real thing. And those who do not believe this
are the ones who in the end might turn out to be those
most guilty of actual genocide when it does happen
because the most passionate advocates of preserving
the status quo at any price are usually the most passionate
advocates of doing this even at the cost of genocide
thereby almost always precipitating it.

Should I abandon good & reasonable ideas then simply
because they make me the object of scorn & hatred from
those who just can't think straight? What good would I
ever do in this world then? Always denouncing genocide
is fine. Kudos! But sometimes trying to think of ways to
prevent it is better. And better than having people like me.
Massacre in Myanmar

There is an important difference between the Dreamers
of the U.S. and the Rohingya in that while the Rohingya
will always remain a disruptive force in Burma... the
Dreamers are Americans in every way except their legal
status. There is a case to be made about Burma being a
more stable nation without the Rohingya, but there is
no possible way anyone can say America can be better
in any way by kicking out Americans termed Dreamers.

The U.S. Dreamers are people who see themselves in
every way as Americans: they want to integrate and
become indistinguishable from their fellow citizens...
while Burma's Rohingya will always seek to separate
themselves from their fellow citizens even if they have
to use violence: The smartest thing would have been
for the British to listen to the Rohingya themselves
and place the land where the Rohingya were then living
(Rakhine state) in Bangladesh--They didn't do that and
now the Rohingya are paying the terrible price for the
failure of the British colonialists.

This is what it may come to in Europe. And if anyone
really believes Europeans are somehow "better than
the Buddhists of Myanmar" then they're conveniently
forgetting the brutality, viciousness and savagery of
Europe's bloody religious and political wars... every
one of which took place not all that long ago.

The Rohingya belong in Bangladesh. It's sweet and
pretty to say that everybody should be citizens of the
country in which they live... but those who like to
sprout this pretty sweetness never mention the other
side of the coin: that citizens of a country have to be
as equally loyal to that country (as are all its other
citizens). And Muslims are never quite as loyal to any
country in which they live as a minority as are the
non-Muslim majorities of those countries: Muslims are
always and ever will be living with the very unholy
expectation that one day they will overthrow that
country's non-Muslim majority culture and replace it
with an Islamic one--Without so much as one single
exception to this universal dictum in all history.

Is it therefore reasonable to expect that the Rohingya
Muslims are the one sole exception to this rule and
that they are the only Muslims who are victims (in the
eternal Islamic struggle for world domination [Jihad]
by all Muslims everywhere against their non-Muslim
neighbors)... which is the sad tragic history Muslims
have been to humanity since the time of Muhammad?

If you don't know this you are not familiar with the
story of the many tiny Muslim enclaves now dotting
Europe and the problems these Muslims' European
neighbors are just now beginning to face dealing with
those "foreign little Muslim communities" (and will
face in the future in an ever worsening way as those
Muslims increase in numbers): every last Muslim there
expects that their European "hosts" must accept not
merely/only their social equality but above all their
unassailable superiority (religious now, and cultural
later on). None of the problems/conflicts between the
Muslim & non-Muslim communities ever has anything
whatsoever to do with job opportunities or equality
before the law & the rest of it, as the Europeans would
have us all believe in their infinite self-denial and quite
stunningly unending self-delusion:

These still tiny Muslim enclaves never will integrate
[a term which must be understood to mean that ALL
citizens of a given country must be equally loyal to their
country & are not working to undermine it or change
its character/nature in order to secure their exclusive
dominance]. And, as they grow in numbers, their (now
modest expectations of eventually overwhelming their
non-Muslims neighbors will/must inevitably also grow
as well): Expectations NOT of becoming more European
but of altogether overthrowing the old European way
of life and replacing it with an Islamic society (and no
matter what Islamic propaganda tells you). That is the
sad fact everywhere on this planet Muslims have ever
penetrated non-Muslim societies (and, unfortunately,
they have almost everywhere succeeded for the most
part, with very few exceptions... turning once great
flowering civilizations into dark age sewers) because
that IS the religion of Islam [the very nature/essence
of The Jihad] and neither you nor anybody else knows
anywhere any Muslim group that has ever given up its
religion: Muslims are always everywhere & ever will be
separate and ever preparing for the day they take over
and turn one more country to a Muslim-majority state.

Something which is most especially sad for the Rohingya
children, as it is tragic for children of Muslims everywhere
who are so condemned by the mere accident of their birth
to be indoctrinated into a cult of mass murder, butchery,
war, and death: No one can doubt that they are suffering
genocide & ethnic cleansing in Burma.

"They have been called the world's most persecuted
minority," we now hear it said of Rohingyas. As, I am
sure, all the Muslim minorities who ever existed (and
waged war against the non-Muslim majority like the
Rohingya) have been termed until they at last finally
overwhelmed it. And then death or conversion for the
unfortunate defeated non-Muslims, slavery, butchery
& worst.

Remember Erdogan calling the comments by German
politicians Nazism? That is the same kind of reality
one must expect from every Islamist propagandist out
there regardless where they are from. Once the same
thing starts happening in Europe (as is now happening
in Myanmar & happened once long ago in Spain) after
the European Muslims increase their attacks on their
non-Muslims neighbors: I am sure Erdogan and all the
other Islamist dictators & propagandists of the world
will also denounce "the European genocide against
Muslims" as the Europeans fight to save themselves
from the Islamic butchery (of their own making) that
inevitably awaits them too.

From: Hundreds are dead in Burma as the Rohingya
crisis explodes again
: “Right now villages are burning,
people are being killed, residents are fleeing for their
lives,” Fortify Rights co-founder Matthew Smith said.
“I will say it’s shocking, and some of the survivors are
devastated by what they have experienced, what they
have seen.” The world's press seems to believe only the
Muslim activists, promoters and sympathizers. I imagine
this must be the first and only group of Muslims ever to
be victims in their wars against non-Muslims! "Reports"
[from the Rohingya Muslims] "have circulated that
Burmese security forces fired on fleeing refugees, but
the government denies the allegations.

The Rohingya Suffer Real Horrors. So Why Are Some of
Their Stories Untrue?

Whom to believe? The evidence of history, or maybe the
momentary propaganda? Should one believe the reports
of newspeople who state Rohingyas' accounts as factual
truth even though they know they are not hearing from
impartial observers? As newsmen shouldn't they know
better and better account for a more factual/impartial
reporting. On the one hand they report Myanmar is using
a couple of Rohingya militant attacks on police posts and
an army base three weeks ago to justify a campaign to
rid the country of this long-persecuted minority. And
on the other hand they tell us about all of the conflict
which the Rohingya have experienced in Myanmar for
as long as they have lived there: "Though the region
has experienced insurgencies since Burma became
independent in 1948..." One more slip of the truth
between the clenched teeth of Muslim propagandists?

AGAIN: "Myanmar’s national security adviser said this
week that the new insurgent group is intent on
establishing an Islamic state in Rakhine, but members
counter that they only want rights enjoyed by all
citizens in Burma." Are the Rohingya then the only
Muslims on earth not trying to establish an Islamic
state?! Even Erdogan is trying to make the once semi-
democratic Turkey into a fully Islamic state now.

Reading between the lines: From Hundreds are dead
in Burma as the Rohingya crisis explodes again
: "The
insurgents are crudely equipped, and the amount of
public support they have is unclear. Raids have
recovered small stockpiles of weapons, but videos of
training sessions show only a few dozen scrawny and
shabbily dressed fighters." Stockpiles of weapons, and
yet "everybody" says the Muslims are only victims here?
"Tens of thousands of Rohingya have fled to Bangladesh
since the Aug. 25 attack, monitors say, while more
than 10,000 Buddhists have been internally displaced
within the state. Hundreds of ethnic minorities have
also fled." Sorry, what are these Buddhists fleeing? Is
the army also killing Buddhists and other non-Muslims?
Are the "only a few dozen scrawny and shabbily dressed
fighters" reported by the world press chasing 10,000
bloodthirsty Buddhists out of Rakhine State? Is that it?
"The clashes and army crackdown have killed nearly 400
people and more than 11,700 'ethnic residents' have
been evacuated from the area, the government said,
referring to the non-Muslim residents." One might
wonder why non-Muslims would need to be evacuated
when the army is only going after Muslims? Wonder of
all wonders!

From: New Myanmar fires in empty Rohingya village
raise questions
: "Among the buildings on fire was a
madrassa, an Islamic school. Copies of books with
texts from the Quran, Islam's holy book, were torn up
and thrown outside. A nearby mosque was not burned."
Why would the Pagans show such respect for a Mosque?!
And why would an ethnic-cleansing campaign leave a
mosque standing untorched as if in some expectation
Muslims might one day return to pray there?!

AGAIN: "The fighters of the Arakan Rohingya Salvation
Army say they launched the attacks on area police to
defend persecuted Rohingya communities." What a
coincidence: That also happens to be the cause of Hamas,
of the PLO, of ISIS, and of every other Islamist terrorist
group on earth (including all those "lone wolf" attacks
everywhere here in the West).

AGAIN: "Most international aid workers left northern
Rakhine state after the government highlighted that
supplies from international aid groups, including
USAID, had been found in raids on Rohingya fighter
positions. The U.S. ambassador to Burma, Scot Marciel,
called the implication that aid groups had supported
ARSA “absurd.” But, shall we revisit Gaza, and all those
times that Hamas munitions and even rockets ready to
be launched against Israeli civilians were everywhere
found stored in U.N. facilities there?

AGAIN: "Those who have made it to Bangladesh are in
poor condition. Most have walked for days from their
villages — hiding in jungles, crossing mountains and
rivers with what they could salvage from their homes,"
Khan said Wednesday at a briefing in Geneva." If they
are escaping to Bangladesh (which is what they say the
army wants them to do), then why are they hiding? And:
“The vast majority are women, including mothers with
newborn babies, families with children,” Where are the
men? Why are the men staying behind if, as the "world
press" would have us believe, this is strictly a case of
a Buddhist genocide and not a raging war? "The United
Nations Population Fund estimates that two-thirds of
the refugees are women and girls." But I don't blame
anyone's naiveté: Even the Dalai Lama has fallen for it!

Well: “Even if I stay in my home, I could get killed
by the military,” said Abul Osman, a 32-year-old
madrassa instructor and ARSA fighter who spent three
months hiding in the jungly hills on the Myanmar-
Bangladesh border after the group’s attack last
October. “I might as well die fighting for my rights,
as directed by my almighty God. My sacrifice will earn
me a place in heaven.” And there you have the real
cause of all this human grief, misery, and tragedy:

In: How Violence in Myanmar Radicalized a New
Generation of Rohingya
, they let it out how "Nearly
every Rohingya village in northern Rakhine now has
an ARSA cell with at least 10 members, according to
fighters who fled to Bangladesh." And there you have
the raw naked truth of Aung San Suu Kyi's statement
about the terrorist nature of the Rohingya in Myanmar,
very unsubtly and most probably unwittingly revealed
for the most prejudiced to come to grips with and even
those without much understanding to grasp finally.
Now, we know that in Spain at least Christianity stood up
against the most powerful assault on Europe by Islam
[a religion dedicated to the supremacy of its own god
over the Christian one]. And in several other places
like Vienna, in Italy, and Greece (as well as in other
places). But can such a philosophy as Buddhism [which
is not designed to maintain the supremacy of any human
partisanship] stand up to the murderous onslaught of
Islam? We can see a hint of the answer in Burma, where
a native Buddhist population is even now engaged in a
terrific struggle with a Muslim group (the Rohingyas)
who some time ago invaded Burma from Bangladesh and
who continue to this day their Islamic push against
the native Buddhist population they came upon there:

The Buddhists of Burma are working out a way for them
to counter this insidious Muslim invasion in spite of
a very powerful vicious propaganda campaign being
carried out (all over the world) against them designed
to make victims of the Rohingya Muslims. [What? No, of
course: Since the time of Muhammad the principal duty
given to each Muslim has been The Jihad: his sacred
duty to convert every non-Muslim or to slaughter him
without mercy, rob him of all that he owns, to enslave
his women and his children and to sell them all into
depravity & slavery... but the Rohingya Muslims just
happen to be the 1 singular exception in Islam's tale of
horror & inhumanity? Oh yeah, sure.] Think how easy it
also would have been for these same "designing people"
to make victims out of the Moors of Spain! Well, to
those duped into the "idyllic prejudice" that the poor
Rohingyas should be considered native Burmese too
because they've been in the country for centuries now
I point out the 700+ years of unimaginably bloody war
that it took the Spanish to finally liberate themselves
from the Muslims who invaded them from the Middle
East and Africa--The solution for the Rohingyas is for
them to return to their country of origin (Bangladesh)
exactly like the Spanish Moors were finally forced to
return to North Africa and the Middle East from where
they had invaded Europe: If non-Muslims could live
anywhere in peace amongst Muslims for long you
wouldn't see ALL the non-Muslim populations in ALL
Muslim-majority lands on this planet being whittled
away by threats & endless vilification, libel, terror
and genocide, and death even unto extinction.

Not counting European wars and a civil war that was
made all the more vicious by becoming a proxy for
National Socialism's war against Communism... that
historical retreat by the Moors did give Spain a peace
which lasted from the time of Columbus to the present
(just as insidious) mass introduction into Europe of
another Muslim population [this time by Europeans
with little or no grasp whatever of the too clear and
obvious lessons of their own history]. And in spite of
the many different ethnic minorities that populate
Spain--apparently ever so willing to advocate for a
national separation.
No reasonable person can possibly advocate for the
forceful removal of an ethnic minority from the place
in which they have lived [for as many years as the
Rohingya have in Burma]. But the fact is that there
will never be peace in that region as long as these
Rohingya Muslims abide in Myanmar: For the sake
of everyone in that region the UN should find the best
possible way for the Rohingya to integrate back into
Islamic Bangladesh--since they'll never do so with the
Myanmar non-Muslims just as Muslims will never live at
peace within any majority non-Muslim society anywhere.

Why is Myanmar condemned for wanting to push out the
Rohingya and not Bangladesh
(from where the Rohingya
originally came from) & is waiting to do exactly the same
thing to them? There is no question that the Rohingya
are being most brutally persecuted NOW, whoever is
doing that persecution: No one who knows the nature of
man can doubt the awful truth of those horrible accounts
which the Rohingya civilians are reporting to the world.
But whosever fault it is (ad there's plenty to go around),
the ultimate solution for the Rohingya is the one that
the Jews came up with while being hounded from place
to place across the last two millennia: "Living well is
the best revenge." The Rohingya must begin to build
their future themselves with patience and humanity,
perseverance, and strength of will. Then, eventually,
wherever they end up, they will not merely survive but
thrive and conquer the cruel fate others wish for them.
The Huffington Post is documenting the rising wave of
anti-Muslim bigotry and violence in America. Take a
stand against hate.

  "... a British government investigation last year
  determined that while the Muslim Brotherhood had
  ties to extremism, it was not a terrorist group."

It may not currently be actively engaged in terrorist
activities, but it is the place from which al-Qaida
originated, and it is the ideological foundation of today's
latest wave of Islamic terrorism (after Saudi Arabia).

    "The Muslim Brotherhood affects CAIR the way
    a dust storm on Mars affects the weather in
    Washington, D.C. --Corey Saylor of the Council
    on American-Islamic Relations"

Or the way the Brownshirts [Sturmabteilung] affected
the Gestapo (which eventually obliterated them), but
that doesn't mean the Brownshirts weren't Nazis too: it
was the Brownshirts that Adolph Hitler rode to power.

   “It takes five or eight years to join [The Muslim
   Brotherhood]” Eric Trager said, and “they vet you
   at every stage.”

Gee, I wonder why...

   “Demonizing these organizations,” Lana Safah
   added, “will only hinder national security efforts to
   eradicate the roots of violent extremism.” Nathan
   Lean, author of the 2012 book The Islamophobia
   Industry, agrees."

Gee, what a surprise he should agree!

   "A group that couldn’t control Egypt for a year
   certainly couldn’t control America."

Would you really want to need to have the American
Military stage a coup against its own government in
order to rid us of The Muslim Brotherhood? Really?

Muslims and their Western dupes and enablers always
want the debate to concentrate upon the defense of
[charities and other prayer groups, political associations,
and social organizations not directly engaged in terrorist
acts, and/or everyday ordinary people], creating the
impression that those who point out the evils of Islam
are trying to make those "[charities and other prayer
groups, political associations, and social organizations
not directly engaged in terrorist acts, and/or everyday
ordinary people]" the innocent victims of their therefore
unwarranted attacks: They, Muslims and their Western
dupes and enablers, NEVER want to have to defend
Islam itself because they know all too well that that
would place the focus of the debate on something which
is utterly & completely indefensible: namely Islam itself.

And, for the most part, Muslims and their Western
dupes and enablers are succeeding in this tactic all too
well: It is exceedingly rare to come upon any kind of
debate on Islam anywhere in the West where most of
the controversy centers not around "innocent Muslims"
being "attacked" for leading their peaceful ordinary
lives--Naturally this always puts those who are trying to
point out the evils of Islam at a tremendous polemical
disadvantage (which is what this is designed to do).

It is for this reason that in order to reverse this grim
current Islamic winning tactic those who would point
out the evils of Islam must learn to force themselves
to ignore the promoters/spreaders of Islam's winning
strategy of steering the debate toward anything and
everything BUT Islam itself... and instead concentrate
exclusively on the mission which WILL defeat that
insidious Islamic tactic by bringing the debate back to
where it belongs: the merits of Islam itself, alone.

No matter how hard Muslims and their Western dupes and
propagandists want to make the argument about "people"
those who wish to win the battle between Good and Evil
must always insist on making the argument about Islam:
An argument which Islamic propagandists can never win.
America (nor most other Western nations) does/do not
want to acknowledge that all of these Islamic terrorists
are terrorists because they are Islamic
. So how can
America & the rest of the Western World ever hope to
get to the root of why these terrorists are terrorists
if they refuse to acknowledge what is at the root of
their terrorism? These terrorists are not terrorists
because they are mentally insane (unlike all those
crazies who've carried out mass murder BECAUSE they
are clinically insane) ... they [ITs] are not terrorists for
economic reasons, and they are not terrorists because
of some warped political bent. No: They are terrorists
because the Koran commands them to be terrorists
, and
until America acknowledges that unavoidable truth...
we will have to contend with a terrorism which we will
never understand & therefore never find a solution to.

For all those of you who most ignorantly believe that
there are "moderate" Islamists, here's a video of
America's terrorists in Syria beheading a child--Enjoy!

These are the so-called "moderate" Muslims your taxes
support in Syria at the moronic direction of Kerry and
Obama--Dude, they ALL take their marching orders
from the same book: the Quran. And those who are
not butchering the innocent today will be butchering
the innocent tomorrow. That's the 1 certainty in all this.

Hate letter sent to Mosque: 'Trump will do to Muslims
what Hitler did to the Jews'

I do not condemn Islamic Terror because it is Islamic
but because it's Terror. Therefore I condemn all forms
of Terror, everywhere they occur, for whatever reason,
and whomever they may be aimed at. True: If all sides
are engaged in acts of Terror... who can in all good
conscience then take sides, when in taking sides one
would invariably find himself standing on the side of Evil
(whichever side one took)? It's always unconscionable to
stand on the side of Evil--even if it is standing against
whatever other Evil may be standing on the other side.
However, this does not mean that I take at any time
into consideration anything other than the Terror acts
themselves, and therefore do I condemn all such acts.
Why People Join Nigeria's Boko Haram

Could be because Boko Haram is simply the purest
expression of Quranic Islam: Blood, butchering, raping,
stealing others' properties and keeping it in the name
of God, enslaving non-Muslims and selling them off,
torturing, terrorizing, beheading, maiming... it's all
the essence of Quranic Islam. And Muslims, like all
other pious people in the world, eventually seek the
comfort zone of the purest expression of their faith.
"In February, four Coptic Christian teenagers were sent
to prison for five years for a video
that showed them
laughing as they recited Koranic verses while one ran
his hand against his neck, mimicking a beheading. The
boys said the video was intended to mock the Islamic
State’s violence, but the judge ruled that they had
insulted Islam."

I cannot imagine that even these inane teens did not
know that they were talking about the same thing.
For "the Islamic State’s violence" and Islam are the
same exact thing. Or: Where in Hell do you imagine
that "the Islamic State’s violence" comes from?!?
[Buddhist philosophy perhaps? Maybe Christian
practice? Why can't people think straight? This is
why political correctness is such a deadly poison.]

QUOTE: Article 98 of the Egyptian penal code—orders
a prison sentence of as long as five years and a hefty
fine for anyone who insults or strives to hurt other
religions, or spreads extremist religious thoughts. It
was first used under President Anwar Sadat in the
1970s to rein in the Muslim Brotherhood, which was
inciting attacks against Christians at the time."

In the name of respect for all religions I would ask
the Islamic World that expects people to believe all
sorts of nonsense to please express public support
for the Irish belief in Leprechauns, as well as that of
the English in fairies (of every dust & color). And if
not, why the Hell not? [Certainly neither fairies nor
Leprachauns are any great threat to anyone. And
they are certainly just as real and manifest as Allah.]

QUOTE: Islam Behery, an Islamic researcher and former
television show host, was given a one-year prison
sentence in December for questioning the sources of
some of the prophet Muhammad’s sayings. His television
show, “With Islam,” was shut down. And last month,
Egypt’s justice minister was fired for saying he would
throw the prophet Muhammad in jail if he perpetrated
a crime. Those remarks, too, were widely viewed on
social media as blasphemous. “The main direction for
the state is not to let the Islamists attack them for
being too liberal,” said Amr Salama, a film director.
“So they are becoming more conservative than the
Islamists. What happened with Fatma Naoot would
have never happened under the time of Mubarak, or
under the time of the revolution, or under Morsi.”

People who wouldst say anything against fairies or
Leprachauns in Egypt... had better watch how they
disparage them there! [And, say I, it's about time!]
Lynch: Spike In Anti-Muslim Hate Crimes Is A 'Stain
On Our Nation's Very Soul'

Curiously, Lynch said not a word about the crimes that
the Muslims have been committing all over the world
from the day Mohammed invented the mumbo-jumbo of
Islam in order to ease the conscience of the members
of his gang of cutthroats over the monstrously inhuman
crimes he was asking them to commit during his crime
spree, and which monstrously inhuman crimes Muslims
are still committing [without humanity or conscience]
until just about two minutes ago: Read the papers,
watch the news! Heed the realities not the propaganda.

Do not let yourself be brainwashed the same way that
vicious & immoral propagandists [without conscience,
morality or scruples] manipulated these New York City
schoolchildren--because if you are not careful you too
most assuredly will be
: The Koran is not so much a
bible as it is a poisonous war manual--one which was
maliciously designed to suspend in Muslims all human
morals, scruples (and humanity itself): So therefore
be eternally forewarned that ANYONE promoting or
defending Islam will almost certainly have taken the
obscene lessons of the noxious Koran manual to heart.

Europe is, or soon will be, looking for a strong man.
Hollande is more a dweeb than anything else, and
Merkel is practically Erdogan's whore. Mister Sarkozy
is damaged goods, while Marine Le Pen is but only a
French nationalist (like all other European nationalists).
So, whom will it be? Will it even be a man? I don't
see anyone in Europe channeling the anger of the
non-Muslim Europeans across the continent like Trump
is doing in America. But it's early still. And it's
certainly coming.

Here's a Muslim's understanding/explanation of whom
it is that is "putting Christians in the Muslim world at
" and apparently it is NOT the Muslims who are
butchering Christians there! It is instead [surprise!]
the Christians here in the West! [And now you may be
finally starting to grasp the twisted mindset of the
Muslims and their insidious attempts to shift the blame
for the Islamic butchery away from the Muslims who
are the ones actually carrying it out!] Mister Zogby's
argument seems to be that to help the Christians in
the Muslim world Christians outside it should instead
of denouncing it or acting against it... show love for
and fellowship with all Muslims. Yeah, that'll work.
A miserable little village at the center of the Israeli-
Palestinian conflict

  "The hamlet of Susiya, where Arab herders live in
  tents without running water or electricity from the
  grid, has been adopted by the international community.
  But Jewish settlers say the Palestinian residents are
  squatters, and Israel's military authority in the West
  Bank wants to demolish the ramshackle community."

Now, why doesn't the international community adopt
Aleppo or Palmyra, or Mosul, or Apamea, Dura-Europos,
Mari, Nineveh, Nimrud, or a thousand other suffering
cities in Africa or Asia, or suffering nations such as
Zimbabwe, Cuba, or Venezuela... where their "concern"
WOULD bring about the greatest good for the greatest
number of genuine victims of war, famine, and other
human ills and suffering (mostly all man-made)? Well,
certainly NOT because it would do "its adoptees" there
about a billion times more good than simply paying for
turning a few Bedouins' and other nomads' tents into
permanent concrete structures... but because it just
wouldn't "irk a Jew" as much if they did that, would
it! And that just about tells you all you need to know
about the international community's "concern" about
dear little shanty town Susiya: It is all more about
hate than about love or anything else. It is all more
about being against "someone" than about being for
anyone or anything whatever [Man's true humanity].
As expected, our "principled" politicos are rushing to
take advantage of the Orlando Massacre in order to
advance their pet peeves. [And, yes, this tragedy will
probably benefit Trump's campaign the most.] But, as
usual... those on the Obama-Clinton camp are also
pushing hard their incomprehensible agenda of trying
to deflect blame away from the motive behind this
crime to the weapon used to commit it
... as if it were
logical that not addressing the motive for a crime
were ever able to either solve it or to prevent crimes
like it in the future

It is incomprehensible because it is as if, in their sad
minds, Prohibition never happened. If there were the
slightest chance in Hell that guns really could be
banned (abolished from the world), I would be its most
vocal advocate, but there just isn't--People who want
guns will always find a way to get them even if they
have to build them themselves... exactly as they once
started brewing gin and beer in their bathtubs during
Prohibition (when they were too poor to buy the real
"imported" stuff). The only thing banning gun will do
is create a gun Mafia to rival or even surpass the old
Mafias which Prohibition created (and which are still
very much with us).

Question for Obama, Clinton, and & other Democrats:

You love to tell us that while there are thousands and
thousands of Muslims in America only a few of them
ever commit mass murder episodes... and that therefore
this justifies Muslims in general not being targeted to
be banned or expelled en masse from the country.

So why doesn't your same logical argument (above)
apply to Ar-15s, say, given that there are thousands
and thousands of them in the country but only a few of
them are ever used to commit mass murder: Why wouldn't
this also justify that Ar-15s in general NOT be banned
or forbidden (with as much force of reason and logic)?

After all, it would seem that people would carry a
greater burden of "guilt" than things: I don't see
liberals advocating that we ban cars either because a
few of them are used to commit murders (which many,
many cars are). And I am neither a lover of guns nor
an advocate of everybody in the world owning them...

These massacres (unimaginable to the imagination of
civilized man) which you and others like you like to
believe (or pretend) are "senseless, without purpose,
random acts of mental illness and opportunity (the
availability of guns," in your sick imagination)... are
really always planned, done with a very specific goal
& purpose, and always for advancing well-established
aims: And they are, even more tragically, preventable
because those aims & goals & purposes that engender
them are out there for everyone to see... and usually
unusually well advertised long, long beforehand by the
perpetrators of these crimes [as the reason they will
commit them] giving those with the will and strength
of purpose to prevent them lots & lots of time to do
the right thing--If only they but face facts instead
of trying to hide them, Mr. President, Mrs. Clinton.

It is not merely the people trying to stop these crimes,
massacres & mass murders, who are left puzzled and
annoyed by liberal left-wingers like Clinton, Obama &
their Democratic brethren's quite inexplicably always
seeking to deflect the blame from the real reason for
them--even the perpetrators themselves don't quite
understand it, if for different reasons: They because
the REASON they commit them IS to promote their
causes, while the rest of us because by hiding the
reason those crimes are committed (behind a pointless
crusade against the guns with which they're committed)
Clinton & Obama & the rest of them are ensuring that
the reason for those heinous crimes shall remained
unaddressed & that therefore we shall continue to be
victimized over & over again by them sans restraint.
France Reels as Bastille Day Truck Attack Kills 84 in Nice

O dear, now I suppose we must get ready for Obama
and the liberal left's endless push for "truck-control"
and who should be allowed to own them. And for all
the right-wing crazies on the other side who'd like
to see everybody & his dog driving trucks. [Naturally,
the truck lobby now will most likely endorse Trump.]

The good news is that not all Muslims are terrorists.

Mrs. Merkel and her friends invited "good" Muslims
into Europe--and they're certain they know what a good
Muslim looks like: Eventually they'll take a good look
at every one of these Muslim refugees and send back
those who don't look "good" to them. And, of course,
the Muslims now being born in Europe MUST all be
"good." [So naturally they stay.] All that's required to
keep these "native" European Muslims "good" is to not
let them contact "bad" Muslims through the Internet;
because, as everyone knows... "good" Muslims are too
easily "radicalized" by contact with "bad" Muslims. O,
don't you just love how virtuous dear Mrs. Merkel is!

It's hard to radicalize a Lutheran but not a Muslim.
[Don't ask me why--I know nothing about Islam.]

The problem IS that these "virtuous" people believe
the myth that there are evil men in this humanity--
no doubt as a direct result of their believing the myth
that there are virtuous men: The truth is that all of
us are both good and evil all at the same time; and
that we hate only as much as we love--therefore our
capacity to do evil is limited only by how much we
believe we're doing it for the sake of what is good.

Every last person on this earth can be talked into the
most unimaginable crimes (sometimes if it's but only
suggested to them that doing even the greatest evil
is for the greatest good). So therefore it is not always
the dirtiest most godless criminal we should fear will
do us the greatest harm but that most pious "decent"
person we admire & welcome into our hearts & homes:

Mrs. Merkel and others invited the Middle East into
Europe--What did they think was gonna happen!?!

Frankly I think Europe's been extremely lucky: There
are twice as many Muslims in France as in Lebanon,
but look at how Lebanon's doing; there are twice as
many Muslims in Europe as there are in Syria, but look
at how Syria is doing--and thus Libya, Afghanistan, in
all the Boko Haram nations in Africa. Heck, there are
but 4 and a half million Palestinian Muslims but they
have made a Hell for themselves in the Middle East, for
Israel, and for the entire world!... Haven't they been
ramming vehicles into civilians there for a while now?
And didn't ISIS order its operatives in Europe to start
doing the same there? Surely the Europeans must've
been preparing for Nice to happen somewhere!...
And, why isn't Ban Ki-Moon and the United Nations
investigating France (like it does Israel for similar
cases) for its "obviously extrajudicial execution" of
the terrorist truck driver?

If intellectual comfort is what thou seeks: "When you
can shelter millions of Muslim refugees, what's a few
measly massacres they might cause you here & there

Keep up the good work! Not every Muslim's a terrorist.

Obama: Orlando Shooter Was 'Homegrown' Terrorist

Ah! Apparently, according to Obama, it was not Islam
that made this guy a terrorist but hateful, despicable

Only in Politically Correct America: This guy meeting
with a couple of Jihadists here & there, with Islamic
militants & Muslim radicals didn't raise any particular
red flags. What if he'd met with some child molesters
here & there instead? I wonder whether that would
have raised any particular red flags?... I do wonder.

Amazing stuff! From Obama Excoriates Republican
Obsession With The Term ‘Radical Islam’

“What exactly would using this label accomplish? What
exactly would it change? Would it make ISIL less
committed to try to kill Americans? Would it bring in
more allies? Is there a military strategy that is
served by this?” Obama asked rhetorically, using
another name for the Islamic State. "The answer is
none of the above. Calling a threat by a different
name does not make it go away.”

I suppose not, in which case I imagine Obama probably
also doesn't understand why it isn't that people don't
call rapes "overly amorous episodes" or some such...

Dear Mister President: It's not because of the effect
(one way or the other) on the damn Islamists that we
ought to call a pig a pig but because of its effect on
us: Until WE stop ordering pork by calling it chicken
we gonna eat chicken. If you wish to understand that
so very simple truth all you have to do is to stop being
so damn sensitive about insulting the sensitivities of
our enemies & try helping US defend ourselves instead!
Yes, let's talk a little bit about Nazism: Do you believe
that Nazism was bad or good? Do you believe that ALL
Nazis were bad? Or is it your opinion that only those
Nazis who did bad things were bad... while all the
others were good, decent people? If someone calls
himself a Nazi but is not involved in actually doing
anything bad--do you believe such a person ought to
be respected (admirable) and not be smeared with the
same brush as Nazis who do really terrible things like
murder, torture, rape & other crimes? [And why not?]

Shouldn't a Nazi who has done nothing wrong be invited
to the White House... showered with honors, and sought
after for his humane opinion and impartiality, for his
decency and honesty, for his virtue and benevolence?
And why not? Why should society tar him with the dark
brush of those Nazis who actually carry out great evil
deeds? Indeed why (think you) would anyone seek to ban
membership in the Nazi party, ban Nazi literature (and
everything else NAZI, really)... when they are all quite
perfectly innocent people who just happen to be Nazis.

Well, historically the Islamic genocide that has been
ongoing for the past 1500 years (and, as you may read
in any your local paper, continues unchecked to this
day) far, far surpasses the infamous 20th Century Nazi
genocide many, many times over (and over again).

Plus, the advocacy, promotion, and justifications of
all the unimaginable inhumanities you can find in the
Koran far surpass anything to be found in Mein Kampf.
Most importantly, it is far more likely that every
last Nazi on earth will disavow ALL of Mein Kampf
than it is that most [if any] Muslim will denounce or
repudiate even the most egregious monstrosity in the
Koran. [Ask them.] So why is it then that anyone can
be a Muslim with a perfectly clear conscience... but
not a Nazi? It's certainly something to wonder about.
Ehab Al Shihabi writes: "Who Stands for Islam? Let's
Stamp out 'Gangster Islam'
 ... The message from the
recent terrorist attacks in Paris and Belgium is clear:
Muslims must urgently promote a global grassroots
movement to take Islam back from extremists who use
a twisted interpretation of jihad to justify their violent
ideology..." We are the religion of Peace, right?

    Translation: "We Muslims gotta learn to lie better
    to non-Muslims about the true nature of Islam
    --We've slaughtered so many of the suckers that
    even the dumbest ones are start'n ta catch on!"

Just ditto! Ditto: "Muslims must urgently promote a global
grassroots movement to take Islam back from extremists who use a twisted interpretation of jihad to justify THEIR
violent ideology..." & ditto, ditto, ditto! Ditto e'm to death!

How the Hell you gonna do that when it's YOUR "Jihadist
extremists" who follow the principles of Islam and all
the so-called "moderates" who totally obfuscate and/or
ignore them?!? Dude: It ain't ever happened yet & it
ain't about to happen anytime ever--Go guess why.

[And, no: No matter how many times you repeat a lie
it will always be a lie.]

In every Muslim majority nation on this earth, without
an exception, butchery & mayhem go on on a daily basis
day after day after day
... rapes & other unimaginable
brutalities, torture, kidnappings, thefts, murder and
slaughter, all in the name of Islam while in the West
we glance at this inhuman depravity and quickly look
the other way--as if that would make it all vanish
from the face of the earth. But, here in the West too,
the butchery and murder and the decay of civilization
propelled by the so putrid mores of Islam continue
on & on unabated, ever inexorably increasing while
the non-Muslim population commemorates each death
and victim as if he/she were an individual case without
the slightest connection to any known factors outside
the specific & immediate causes of his/her death--most
usually attributed to some casual lunatic or a pious soul
who has been brainwashed by some inexplicably sinister,
perverse fanatic preacher without any real connections
to the "religion" of Islam! And now there is a push by
some Muslim clerics in some parts of Europe to legalize
child brides
! Where once having sex with any minor
used to be an automatic crime, now some Muslims are
pushing to allow men of any age to "marry" little
girls as young as nine, or younger! Or to "keep" their
sometimes pregnant "brides" if they "married" them
elsewhere and then brought "their families" into their
new European countries afterwards: Respect Islam!
German Protestant bishop wants Islam classes in
all state schools

What for? All anyone who want to learn anything about
Islam has to do is... just read the news that's coming
out of [what's happening in] all the Muslim-majority
nations of the world. That will tell you as much about
Islam as reading the news of what's happening in your
country tells you everything about your own country.

Note that even the peace-at-all-cost Buddhists cannot
abide living anywhere alongside a Muslim community
Does anybody really believe that the only-West-called
'Rohingya' Muslims of Myanmar were a nice peaceful
community and that for no reason whatsoever at all
suddenly their Buddhist neighbors decided to start a
campaign of racial/religious discrimination against them!?

Well, Yes! A Western audience which has been deluded
by just a few decades of unrelenting "Islam Is The
Religion of Peace" propaganda into the upside-down
belief [flying in the face of every last gruesome fact
on earth showing us it's exactly the opposite]... that
Muslims are everywhere victims, and therefore turns
a blind eye even to the victimization of Christians by
Muslims taking place right in the middle of Europe
Could any of Islam really have been part of America's
founding principles
? Well, let's see... how old is "the
oldest mosque in the United States (near Ross, N.D.)?"
It "was erected by pioneers from what are now Syria
and Lebanon, in 1929. A reminder," says the article
above, "that Muslims have been part of the American
mix for a long time." (Or about some 20 years more
than I?) "Muslim communities have been in this country
since the 1800s," it goes on to state--Well, a number
of slaves brought from Africa had been Muslims, so
there were probably Muslims here even before then.
And wealthy Muslims from Egypt & many other countries
have been recorded travelling here/even settling here.
But, were they informing the direction of American
principles? I doubt it since Islam was not prohibited
as a religion here (and, had it influenced our founding
principles, surely you'd expect all religions but the
official one of those in power to have been banned).
And this should pretty much inform you, if you really
needed to be informed on this, just how well-informed
our dear Professor Obama is about American History.

Are all censures/condemnations of God wrong?

Not if you believe God is good: For in that case evil
attributed to God should definitely be censured, as
should a God that is evil be condemned & censured.

Christians believe Jesus is such a God of The Good.
Therefore any evil attributed to God disqualifies such
a God from being the God Christians believe Jesus to
be. It would be unacceptable for Christians to think
that Jesus in any way/shape/form is capable of Evil.
Any evil claimed in the name of Jesus is anathema.
Any evil done in the name of Christianity is truly an
abomination--Therefore any God which approves or
encourages Evil is worthy of censure/condemnation.

Muslims, on the other hand, make no moral judgments
regarding Allah: Unquestionably Muslims commit many
horrors/fiendish cruelties in the name of Allah; and,
in fact, the Koran itself advises Muslims to terrorism
& other inhumanities
which many Muslims carry out
with jolly great disregard of their unquestioned Evil.

Therefore the Muslim God is NOT a God of The Good. And
this is the reason Allah is a God that MUST be censured
and condemned by Christians: Fail to do so at your peril.

This alone is why Allah could NOT possibly be the God
of Christians. Nor can he ever be. And no matter how
much Muslims and others may try to claim otherwise.
The United Nations simply does not work as instituted:
Any jury that's made up mostly of murderers is more
likely to condemn the victims than the murderers
. And
so it is too with the United Nations as it is presently
instituted: an immoral place in which votes are bought
& sold as shamelessly as are fish in a fish market.

No agreement in the United Nations is ever reached
against any evil simply because it is an evil. Rather:
ONLY if/when the voters receive some benefit from
their accent (and this does not exclude even the
United States). What does that make of ANY United
Nations resolution!

Because there are no practical workarounds for UN
votes on any form of evil which can escape peopling
its juries with the most evil men on earth... the only
practical solution is to eliminate any & all United
Nations condemnations of Evil--Which might as well
effectively eliminate the United Nations itself then

In any case: the United Nations is only kept alive now
by powerful nations which hope they can power through
those resolutions favorable to themselves (at whatever
expense to whoever has to pay for their sordid wins).

Therefore, the only alternative is to keep the UN as is
and watch it continue to be the most effective force for
Evil on this planet. This is totally & completely unacceptable
and must be addressed sooner or later by the complete
and total elimination of the UN itself from this world:

We must come up with a better design, or junk it as an
irredeemably corrupt and unworkable institution that
works only against the common good of Mankind. At
best, perhaps the United Nations can be retained as "a
town hall assembly" where the World's problems and
concerns are endlessly & pointlessly argued by rowdy
gangs of competing partisans trying to out-shout each
other (and certainly WITHOUT the least possibility of
their joint "opinions" ever acquiring either any force-
of-law or even moral force--since the main objection
to the UN IS its sheer raw unquestioned immorality).
Palestinian History Museum Opens Without Exhibits

Need one say anything more? Fear not: We'll start
filling it up just soon as we begin 'making up' some
Palestinian history. Let's see... "Israel was founded.
Then some Arabs heroically decided to call themselves
Palestinians in order to claim Israel was founded on
their land..." And be sure to put the plaques up in
all the European tongues so they can lick our---

On the other hand, a "little bit" of the history there.

It is not up to the United States nor to any outsiders
to determine how the Jews and the Muslims of the Holy
Land must live together: Only they & they alone can
settle that matter. Any "solution" imposed from the
outside will fail as miserably as the Oslo Accords and
every other outside imposition have failed up to now

It is self-evidently a grave misconception to imagine
that the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict is one which can
be even addressed in any way/shape/form by diplomacy
between the Israelis & the Palestinians, since the root
Cause of the problem (probably The Only One) is that
the Muslim Palestinians are held in the grip of a deadly
cult whose god commands them to murder the Jews
"wherever they find them." [How on earth are the Jews
ever going to argue/reason/plea or "deliberate" out of
existence this religious command?!] No: If there is
going to be any so-called "diplomatic" solution to the
deadly Israeli-Palestinian Conflict it is going to have to
come exclusively through negotiations between the
Palestinian Muslims and their god. And what possible
role could the Israeli Jews have in such negotiations?!

The only possible thing the Israeli Jews can do is to
hold the Palestinian Muslims by the throat to keep
them from murdering them. And the greatest mystery
is why the Jews don't kill off the Palestinian Muslims
or kick them out as far away as they can from Israel.
(As the only other alternative is the suicide of Israel.)

No matter what anybody tells you... those are the only
options the Palestinians have ever given to the Israelis.

It is not up to the United States nor to any outsiders
to determine how the Jews and the Muslims of the Holy
Land must live together: Only they & they alone can
settle that matter. Any "solution" imposed from the
outside will fail as miserably as the Oslo Accords and
every other outside imposition have failed up to now.

"Europe will now have to live under these perpetual
states of emergency which are becoming the normal in
today's modern world..." Sirs, the Europeans did not
suddenly/unexpectedly invent the need for these states
of emergency--Your leaders imported/created the need
for these states of emergency for the same reason the
leaders in Flint, Michigan created the lead-poisoning
crisis there: stupidity, neglect, ignorance, and the
common delusion that one can always do things on the
cheap. For Europeans to now be bemoaning the terrible
consequences they have themselves wrought upon
themselves as some sort of incomprehensible curse
imposed upon them by the gods (or something) is
laughable and contemptible. Rather: You asked for all
you're getting, so at least enjoy it for God's sakes!

You cannot move into your neighborhood a truckload of
criminals and then bemoan the sudden need for armed
coppers on every one of your street corners. You can't
move into your neighborhood a truckload of addicts and
then bemoan all the used needles appearing everywhere.
You can't just jump off a cliff and only then bemoan
your fall: Sometimes you just have to use your brains
and look before you leap, my friend.

Why is Brussels under attack?

By Muslims? That is a stumper: Why isn't Japan under
attack by Muslims? I'm sure it's not because Brussels
is full of Muslims while Japan isn't. No: This has to
be a total and complete coincidence that doesn't have
anything whatsoever to do with anything. So, bring on
more Muslims! [They help to keep all those uppity
women in their place too
.] Guys:

A working solution has already been implemented in
our history and it brought peace for 500 years to the
European country that put it into effect: Spain gave
the Muslims the choice of converting to Christianity
(in effect, fully assimilating into its Christian culture)
or returning to their countries of origin. It worked
for Spain--It even worked for the Muslims who returned
to North Africa and built large and powerful Islamic
nations there--Certainly not European democracies,
but nevertheless nations which survived in many forms
there to this day to see the disaster of well-intentioned
Western intervention there to try to build democracies
Lord! Won't they ever learn? Guess not. It's the drastic
solution, yes, but it is not the most drastic solution
--THAT is a protracted and unimaginably bloody civil
war on European soil. And if they don't do something
to nip it in the bud NOW, that is exactly what we will
witness there with our own unbelieving eyes.

"It's the occupation! Yes; That's it--It's the occupation
of the peaceful Muslim communities by an apartheid
European colonial power: Brussels' Muslims are under
a brutal European occupation which is leaving them
impoverished and devoid of all hope: Europeans must
give up their racist occupation of those peaceful Muslim
European communities so they can thrive in peace and
democracy if they don't want to see an Intifada bloodier
than any seen before anywhere! Only then can there be
peace between Muslims and Christians in the unholy land
(of Europe). The "numberless states solution" is the only
way to go forward in Europe now: Free Islamic Brussels!..."

The racism & anti-Semitism now rising everywhere in
Europe is truly staggering--something not seen there
since before the Second World War. Some of it is self-
made by the Europeans' cavalier wholesale importing of
populations which can never become European unless
they were to abandon their ruthless dark ages religion
(which Mohammed designed with specifically deadly
safeguards against that very thing
). Another cause is
a mind-numbing resurgence of an anti-Semitism which
neither logic nor reason can fathom now--All of it a
pointless racial antagonism which must inevitably sow
chaos & future civil strife across Europe for years &
years to come as surely as it is sowing it now across
the Muslim world... and has done so there for the last
1500 years. And I cannot imagine how it can end well.
The hypocrisy/cowardice of those who can cherry-pick
which laws they will enforce and which laws they will

Dear sirs, why if under British law "a person can be
charged with inciting racial hatred if they say or do
something which is 'threatening, abusive or insulting
and, by doing so, either intends to stir up racial
hatred, or makes it likely that racial hatred will be
stirred up' " ...why would the coppers jump all over
this one guy [for tweeting merely that he thought a
Muslim woman saying that the Brussels attack had
nothing to do with her was "mealy mouthed"] and not
outright and instantly ban the Koran--A book which
VERY SPECIFICALLY calls for the terrorizing, torturing,
raping, enslaving and murdering of non-Muslims...
when everywhere that is precisely what is taking place
BECAUSE of the Koran's incitement?!?! Why is not every
human being who quotes the Koran, or even so much as
owns one, not instantly charged with incitement to all
the abominations the Koran calls for--especially when
Muslims everywhere ARE in fact carrying out every
unimaginably perverted crime the Koran is calling for?

Answer me that!

The Doddering Dolt of Rome sez:

Use 'weapons of love' to fight evil of terrorism, pope
says on Easter

The maniacal Muslims in Pakistan have their own
inimical way of expressing their feelings back at
the Pope's slobbering message of love & friendship:

The Latest: Taliban Attack on Pakistan Park Kills 65

And so goes the world, exactly as it has for the last
1500 years of Islam's existence here. [Don't worry,
soon the Christians of the world will awake to what's
happening and then... they'll pray & sing hymns.]
To the last one. Amen.

[Dude, this is not an equal fight.]

In the AP's Anti-Migrant Force Builds in Europe, Hurting
Merkel's Quest
they write: "The anti-migrant message
resonates with the ex-communist EU member states,
countries that have benefited greatly from EU subsidies
and freedom of movement for their own citizens but which
now balk at requests to accept even small numbers of
refugees. The Visegrad nations maintain it is impossible
to integrate Muslims into their societies, often describing
them as security threats. So far the Poles, Czechs and
Slovaks have only accepted small numbers, primarily
Christians from Syria. Many officials in the West are
frustrated with what they see as xenophobia & hypocrisy,
given that huge numbers of Poles, Hungarians and other
Eastern Europeans have received refuge and economic
opportunity in the West for decades."

This is nonsensical spin of the facts: The Eastern Europeans
don't want migrants because they're migrants, but because
they're Muslims. And if they were Nazi migrants they'd also
not want them there NOT because they're migrants but
because they're Nazis: If YOU don't know what Nazis are
that's YOUR problem THEY DO (that's why they wouldn't
want them there). And if YOU don't know what Muslims are
THEY DO (that's why they don't want them there).

Visit The Hatred In The Koran to find out about Muslims
if you'd like to learn about them yourself (and Google
"Nazism" if you want to find out about Nazis). Then you
too will know.

There are certainly a vast number of Muslims who are
honest, decent, hard-working people (just as there HAD
to have been a vast number of Nazis who were also honest,
decent, hard-working people carrying out the everyday job
of running Nazi Germany back then--or simply go & ask
their children & grandchildren in today's Germany). But
even the "best" of Nazis carried with them a sick perverted
support for an inhuman philosophy, and even so too do even the "best" Muslims today out there where you live.

BTW: It's utterly insane & suicidal to expect Erdogan
to help stem the flow of Muslim immigrants into Europe
when the central mission in the Islamist philosophy of
world conquest IS the conversion of the entire earth
to Islam
--No amount of bribes or incentives, pressure,
or threats are going to talk a thoroughly convinced
Islamist like Erdogan to abandon what he believes is
(and is) the best of all possible ways to bring about
the Islamization of Europe. So get over it, Europe:
The problem is yours & yours alone to solve, or to be
destroyed by it. But, either way: your choice alone.

Though, frankly, I don't think I'd have the heart to
deport any migrant except perhaps those who have
committed crimes or are proven criminals--and this
never includes children: Deporting children is beyond
the pale, as far as I'm concerned. But I don't even
think I'd deport adults just because they're Muslims
--these people are victims, and I don't believe they
understand how they've been victimized by religion.
EU Criticizes Israel, Builds on Anti-Settlement Policy

Hundreds of thousands of children, women & old people
are being butchered everywhere in the Muslim world,
millions & millions displaced and ethnic-cleansed en
masse, obscene numbers of others raped, enslaved,
tortured, degraded, stoned to death, burnt alive,
crucified, persecuted & oppressed there beyond human
imagination... and Europe's sole focus of indignation
is on trying to keep a few Jews from building their
homes wherever the Hell they want in the land of their
own ancestors! A land which others have stolen from
them and a land which others are still trying to steal
from them--You tell me now Europe isn't rolling self-
fouled in the vile and utterly incomprehensible
depravity of anti-Semitism! I dare you!
In Condemning Islamic Terrorism, Defending Muslims Jonathan Greenblatt writes:

  "Ultimately, it is up to Muslim leaders around the
  world to ask what they can do to create a different
  environment less conducive to the emergence of terror."

Guy, Islam is Terrorism & Terrorism is Islam: If you
  kill Terrorism you're going to kill Islam just as...
  if you kill Islam you will invariably kill Terrorism.

And every Muslim in the world knows this--THAT is the
real reason why the fight against Terrorism is NEVER
going to come from Muslims: Muslim-on-Muslim violence
you see all over the world has NOTHING to do with the
West' fight against Terror--it's all just about one sect
of Muslims trying to convert or annihilate the other sects:
Terror is the Islamic form of proselyting & just as  LONG
before Islam unleashed Terrorism against other Muslims
it was wreaking Terror against non-Muslims... when there
are no more non-Muslims on the entire earth Terror will
still be the order of the day between whatever Muslims
continue to people this earth
, because the Jihad is eternal
and every imam and ayatollah on earth is his own Pope

It's only a matter of time before the African-American
"black Muslims" who dare to style Elijah Mohammed
a "prophet" are also targeted for extermination by the
Sunni Muslims for exactly the same reason: the Sunni
Muslims are rather picky about their contention that
"The Prophet" was named the last prophet by the Koran.
If this has not already happened up to now it's due to
a combination of factors peculiar to the United States,
including effective law-enforcement and... just not
enough Sunni immigrants for them to start the fight.

   "Following 9/11 and the trauma that it was for our
   nation, the president [George W. Bush] spoke at a
   Mosque in Washington, D.C. and made an eloquent
   plea not to blame all Muslims or Islam itself for
   the horror that befell our nation."

And, of course, we all know how well that worked out
for the fight against terror, don't we!... Islam [or,
"Submit!" which is the correct translation of "islam"]
finally turned its outrageous "the religion of peace"
LIE (which the Saudi propaganda machine has been
selling the West) into a truth? I don't see it. You?

Spotted on the boob tube yet one more small group of
very nice and personable, decent and ordinary-looking,
normal-seeming American Muslims being interviewed
about their "fear" of Islamophobia: Transparently one
more illogical, and unreasonable, and cynical attack on
every human soul who is but merely pointing out with
undeniable veracity the unquestioned evils of Islam!

I'm sure Scott Pelley would never think of himself as
an enabler of the Islamic Jihad to conquer the planet,
but that is precisely what he was with this interview:
Here were these five or six souls being brought forth
on The CBS Evening News with Scott Pelley to cry out
for tolerance as if the critics of Islam had something
personally against them--when ALL the points of such
critics are against Islam and against Islam alone. Are
they not to be allowed to criticize so transparently a
criminal and malignant enterprise as Islam obviously
is... just because it terms itself a religion? Why don't
they also bring forth Aztecs to defend ripping out the
hearts of their living victims & kicking the carcasses
down their pyramids for cannibalism? [None left. But
I'd hate to think what CBS might do if there were.]

Has any of these well-meaning and well-intended (and
certainly not self-proclaimed) apologists of Islam who
produce these misleading "shows" for Western audiences
ever asked any of these so often interviewed ordinary
and peaceful decent Muslim Americans what they think
about the monstrous intolerance in the Islamic World?
Why not?  The point  of those who criticize Islam is
that it is Islam that is bad
, not these few saps brought
out to plea tolerance for themselves! So why haven't
these "incisive" interviewers ever bothered to compare
the "terrible" experiences of these few Muslims in the
Christian world with the experiences of Christians in
the Muslim world
? Why not? Would such comparisons
really be so unreasonable, or too illuminating maybe?

Why not ask these sweet souls they are interviewing
whether they have ever protested the butchery and
genocide experienced by the unimaginably unfortunate
non-Muslim minorities EVERYWHERE on this earth where
Muslims are in the majority? And you pick the country...
in Africa, Asia or the Middle East--Wherever you like.
Has anyone ever asked these innocent victims to point
out the mass graves of the murdered Muslims out West,
or in Michigan, maybe in Jersey...? ANYONE can point
out the mass graves, without number, of the innocents
murdered in the Muslim world... They are everywhere!

The REALLY unfortunate minorities in those Muslim
lands can't speak for themselves: they are all of them
being forcibly converted to Islam, or being tortured,
robbed, raped, or they are all dead. Why not interview
(instead, or alongside) the handful of them who HAVE
managed to escape with barely their lives to Europe or
elsewhere... and show THEIR pleas for tolerance in the
Islamic world? I've never seen even ONE such show.

Has anyone ever asked these "poor" American Muslims
pleading for tolerance from the vile Christians here
in America to point out where all those non-Muslim
minorities who once were the majorities in ALL the now
Muslim-only lands can be found nowadays? About the
only substantial Christian minority left anywhere in
the Levant are the Egyptian Copts, whom the Egyptian
Muslims have not slaughtered to the last child (as
Muslims everywhere else have done with all their non-
Muslim minorities) only because they keep them as
a permanent garbage-collecting subclass (otherwise
they would all have been exterminated by now too).

And yet these bleeding-heart left-wing liberals insist
on producing their misleading interviews of a handful
of Muslims pleading for tolerance for themselves as if
anyone who points out the slightest bit of truth about
Islam were intent on persecuting them personally:

Sirs, when the critics of Islam so very correctly and
accurately, and so truthfully point out the evils of
Islam they are not saying that they have anything
personal against the handfuls of unfortunate Muslim
saps like those being interviewed by YOU apologists of
Islam to deflect the blame from where the blame really
falls--And you apologists of Islam perfectly well know
that defending an attack on these Muslim saps which
does not exist is misleading and deceptive... and no
matter whether it's done on purpose or even without
any intent to deceive--Who the Hell would possibly be
against tolerance of the powerless, of those in the
minority, of those who happen to be of a different
ethnicity or religion, of women just because they're
women, of homosexuals just because they're born that
way, of... Oh, yes, that's right: Muslims are. In fact
they have to be, because it is so commanded in the
Quran itself: The Hatred In The Koran Read it yourself!

If these American Muslims want to plea for tolerance,
they are pleading for tolerance in the wrong place for
the wrong reason and from the wrong audience: What
they should be doing is taking their heartfelt pleas to
all of the nations that have Muslim majority populations
--They are the ones that really need such pleading for
tolerance, for sheer humanity: The tragic sad minorities
there, or what is left of them, are the ones that need
all the compassion and all the humanity that the Islamic
world has NEVER shown in all of its blood-drenched
history of savagery, brutality, and death. S D Rodrian

The wisdom of self-sacrifice.

Yes: Wisdom lies in choosing to do something for the
benefit of people rather than just because you want to
win. Assad is NOT going to be defeated (the Iranians,
Hezbollah, and now the Russians are certainly seeing
to that): The heights of wisdom now would be for the
West to stop prolonging the suffering and butchery of
the Syrian people by continuing to arm and support
Assad's opposition: They're achieving nothing but the
continuation of the great tragedy there, and as such
the West is becoming more and more the primary reason
(maybe even the only one) for that desperate tragedy.

At SOME point the so-called leaders of the West have
to admit to themselves that all they are doing there
is standing in the way of an end to this vicious war
and then stop it. It's the only human thing to do now.

The cruelest hoax of all is the idea that wars should be
managed affairs, gentlemanly affairs, even humane
affairs with charitable treatment of non-combatants,
readily assessable medical help, fuel & food aid, and
prompt evacuations of the old, the sickly, of women,
children & the infirm--They're not, and never will be.

The kindest war of all is the one that is fought swiftly,
brutally as this may require, and quickly gotten over
& done with. And those who do not understand this
only prolong the suffering and the brutalities of war.
Those persons, those peaceniks--Ultimately they are
the real warmongers and worst monsters in all wars.
 "Markus Niesczeri, a spokesman for Duesseldorf
  police, said that since the start of 2014, officers
  there have identified more than 2,000 suspects of
  North African origin in connection with organized
  thefts, though he didn't say how many.

But, this is what men do with/to women in the Muslim
--I wonder what possessed the Euros to think that
they would suddenly change their nature/character once
they found themselves in Europe

Mrs. Merkel just said, hilariously, that she condemns
this contempt for women "in some quarters..."

Mrs. Merkel, like Obama and others, is terrified to
acknowledge the truth, that is, to confess that she
now condemns the contempt for women she has
herself imported into Europe from the Islamic world
(where European women are all believed to be
whores on the lookout for any possible sexual thrill).

Well, somebody should tell Mrs. Merkel to enjoy it.
To go ahead and establish Sharia-like punishments
(blinding people in one eye & chopping off hands
and fingers, etc.) to deter criminals used to being
deterred only by the horrors of Sharia. And, like the
Cologne Mayor Henriette Reker, to also tell German
women to do something like maybe starting to wear
the hijab from now on
so they won't be raped in their
own streets while passersby keep walking on as if it
were the most normal thing in the world
--You know,
as happens every day in the rest of the Arab world.

 "Cologne's mayor, meanwhile, was mocked on social
  media for saying, when asked Tuesday about what
  women can do to protect themselves better: "There
  is always the possibility of keeping a certain
  distance, more than an arm's length" from strangers.
  Some of those who criticized her felt that Reker was
  blaming women for the attacks and lambasted the idea
  that women could have simply protected themselves
  by keeping men at arm's length."

... and now Cologne's policemen are also learning to view
these typically ME behaviors as native to Europe too...

 "About 1,000 men described by police as being
  of 'Arab or North African origin' gathered around
  Cologne's main station, next to the city's famous
  cathedral, on the night from Thursday to Friday.
  Smaller groups then surrounded individual women,
  harassed them and stole their belongings. Police
  initially failed to mention the assaults in report
  the following morning, describing the festivities
  as "largely peaceful." Details of the attacks only
  emerged over the weekend and calls have grown
  for a comprehensive review of police actions on
  the night, after some witnesses claimed that
  officers didn't stop the attackers."

  [This was not in Egypt.] This was not simple political
  correctness, but fear of political reprisals by a liberal
  left-wing elite more interested in how it might make
  them look than in the safety of the ordinary citizen.

Swedish Foreign Minister Calls for Israeli Killings Probe

Incredible! I imagine Swedish Foreign Minister Margot
Wallstrom thinks it would only be "fair" if more Jews
allowed themselves to be murdered by those Palestinian
terrorists!!! [Of course not! She's only asking that
when a Palestinian terrorist tries to murder a Jew,
the Jew should at least offer the terrorist the choice
of whether he/she would prefer to try to kill him
there & then OR wait to try again later...] Ah, that's
different then. --You think
? [Yes, it's only "fair."]

Islamic State money-making streams take a hit
as it loses territory

And if they were to lose it all, down to the very last
inch of it (you know... like they did once after the U.S.
overthrew Saddam, and then once again after the
American Army put down the rebellion in Sunni Iraq)
... will the manifest ancient fountain of poison which
gives birth to all such toxic depravity in these men
(still) have been stanched by even one single drop?

This is what the West either fears to acknowledge (or
fails genuinely to understand): that the real enemy is
not every incomprehensible lunatic who suddenly rushes
wildly at us after having been poisoned by that deadly
drink but the poison itself of Islam which is turning
those thirsting for the illusions it promises them into the
inhuman monsters who then outrage all our humanity:

It is a real waste of time to battle every last poisoned
terrorist brought into being by Islam's brainwashing.
The only way to defeat them all once and for all is to
shut down the deadly vile spring of poison which is
responsible for driving them all wildly insane like that...
the one/only source from which their terrorism springs
forth against world & humanity to begin with: Islam!

And the world can only do that by rescuing the Muslims
themselves from the supernatural delusions with which
Islam keeps them enslaved--Certainly NOT by trying to
counter Islam's ignorance & superstition with more
ignorance and more superstition still! No: The history
of Man's securing civilization is one of moving from
the darkness into the light of day... of turning our
backs on those places where we were kept blind, and
our eyes to where we can finally see all of the facts
for ourselves and have no further need to be convinced
by anyone they are indeed the facts. Just as the pen
is mightier than the sword, the light of education will
in the end light every dark place on earth. You'll see.

Putin is no Gandhi, friends, but compared to Erdogan
he's a Peter Pan: We all know Putin is a damn pushy
guy, and most likely than not he is lying through his
teeth when he says the plane the Turks shot down
never violated Turkey's airspace (it's his history). But
he's most probably also telling you the truth when he
says that the Turks did this as a provocation--Albeit
what they wanted to provoke: That is the question.

The Turks have been desperately trying to get NATO
and the United States to back every evil scheme and
stratagem they have come up with for their domination
of the Middle East [and beyond] for as far back as their
Islamic dictator Erdogan has envisioned himself to be
the true Caliph of the "real" Islamic State... And woe
to those foolish enough to enable this madman's sick
dream: Erdogan and his Terror Mafia are the principal
enablers and sustainers of the Islamic State: Without
their direct support the Islamic State would wither on
the vine ... ripped from its nourishing roots (Turkey).
Think! The Islamic State isn't exporting its petroleum
through Israel, I betcha. And it's unimaginable as well
that the Shia Hezbollah would permit such insanity to
take place through Lebanon...

Obama knows this, so why does he continue bombing
$20,000 oil trucks (he says 500 so far) with a quarter
of a million and even half a million dollar munitions?
Is it because he wants to bankrupt America? He can't
do it, so this isn't it. If Obama REALLY wished to put
an end to the Islamic State Monster all he'd have to do
is ring up his pal Erdogan and ask him to STOP buying
ISIS oil: This done ISIS would vanish as quickly as it
appeared. Why doesn't Obama do this? Does it have
anything to do with Sunni Arabs' dream of keeping the
Islamic Terrorist movement alive to counter Shia Iran?

Look thee for The Answer to this in why it is even in
the face of the ferocious terrorism eating up Pakistan
to death that Sunni country STILL refuses to destroy
its own Taliban and all the other Islamic terrorists that
it AND the United States have created in that theatre
of blood. [Remember, after all, who it was that really
created Bin Laden and his al-Qaida.] That is where
you'll find the answer to why Obama stands back and
pours America's treasure into pointlessly plinking oil
trucks instead of destroying The Monster he and his
Sunni blood brothers have created and support there.

You would think that the French President would tell
Obama to stop supporting America's Islamic Terrorists:
["You are killing Parisians, O dear friend of France!"]
But that's for the people of France to inquire of Holland.

France Bombs Islamic State HQ, Hunts Attacker Who
Got Away

Mon Dieu! Actions speak louder than words dept: Brave
talk now about how Islamic terrorism isn't going to scare
anyone--and the reality exposed in the streets of Paris:

   "Paris remains on edge amid three days of official
   mourning. French troops have deployed by the
   thousands and tourist sites remain shuttered in one
   of the most visited cities on Earth. Panic ensued
   Sunday night as police abruptly cleared hundreds
   of mourners from the famed Place de la Republique
   square, where police said firecrackers sparked a
   false alarm.

  "Whoever starts running starts everyone else
  running," said Alice Carton, city council member who
  was at the square. "It's a very weird atmosphere.
  The sirens and screaming are a source of fear."

   "Officers also moved in, guns drawn, after mourners
   panicked near the Carillon bar, where crowds have
   laid flowers and lit candles in memory of the 15
   people killed there.

   "Lots of people started running and screaming
   from the Carillon...tables were overturned, plates
   shattered. It was a terrible panic," said Jonathan
   Dogan, who took shelter in a nearby hotel. "I
   think people are terrified," Dogan said.

And now these poor bastards are searching for geo-
political reasons for these attacks! This absolute and
total ignorance of The True Realities is the direct
result of the evil world-wide political correctness
campaign (no doubt behind the scenes engineered
by a sinister combination of Saudi cash and Islamic
apologists [Obama] and other Western well-intended
idiots caught up in the master plan).

Insults to Mohammed, airstrikes in Syria & Iraq, not
enough government help or economic opportunity for/in
Muslim neighborhoods... there is no end to the blaming
of the victims by the elites and politically correct
media who imply (by such insults to our intelligence &
indignities to the human soul) that those who were
killed were to blame for getting themselves murdered.

But the ordinary French people I bet know who is to
blame and why: Who does not know that the Koran
specifically orders Muslims to "terrorize the non-
?! Who does not know that the one and only
way a Muslim can go straight to Paradise is to die
while murdering non-Muslims?!

I actually heard John Kerry call them "psychopathic
monsters" and the France24 talking heads stated that
these attacks resulted from insanity (meaning that
they could not be explained, that these murderers had
no reason in the world for carrying out their murders)~!

        Hello: The Hatred In The Koran

They read a Twitter by Newt Gingrich in which he said
that perhaps had someone been armed in one of the
attacked venues he/she might have been able to kill
the murderers before they could kill all the people they
did... and damned him for suggesting this! [I imagine
it's better to just stand there and die for the Principle
of Getting Slaughtered Like Lambs: "It is our duty to
stand here and die for humanity!" proudly proclaimed
the nutty scientist in the movie The Thing!] I wonder
why?... Could it be because they are afraid that what
Newt Gingrich had suggested might have some merit?

Well, now that the European elites (who all live safely
under 24-hour armed protection themselves--so what's
it to them?!)... have imported the Muslim Middle East
into Europe, I wonder where to are the new ordinary
European Christian refugee masses themselves going
to flee? ... Asian countries certainly know better than
to start importing non-Asians. See you where?!

Like Europe, once in the long ago all of the Middle
East was mostly a land of Christian societies, nations
& civilizations. And all their Christians were either
murdered or forced to convert to Islam almost down
to the last one (but recently). Now it is Europe's turn.

Today about the only Christian community still left in
the entire Levant are the unfortunate grim-fate Copts
of Egypt whom the good Muslims there have not yet
slaughtered BECAUSE they've managed to turn that
entire Christian community into Egypt's traditional
garbagemen... since garbage-collecting is "haram" for
Muslims: When was the last time you saw any of those
European out-of-work Muslims applying for one of the
many relatively well-paid collector openings everywhere?

I would not doubt that a major part of why the Paris
attack took place was ISIS' resentment against the
Syrians who have fled from them and ISIS' desire to
create an uncomfortable European backlash against
those unfortunate refugees: It would certainly fit in
with the merciless nature of the Islamic State's
fundamentalist cutthroat form of Islam. Still:

The question for the West is this: Why must more
& more & more potential terrorists be brought into
Europe when this MUST unquestionably increase the
likelihood that acts of terror will occur here... when
fewer & fewer & fewer potential terrorists here would
most likely produce fewer acts of terror? Somebody
is playing the numbers game with European lives.

NOTE: "Most of the victims of Islamic Terrorism are
Muslims." This is one of the most powerful reasons to
make every possible effort to avoid allowing the West
to become more Islamic: If nothing else it's certainly
a practical argument against the "liberal left" idea that
more Muslims here will produce fewer attacks on us.

Instead of spewing hatred/fear for/of but children &
women, and proposing plans/schemes out of a less
civilized past
(as too many of the West's elites seem
to be being carried away now by the rising tide of terror
into considering doing) what these swept elites should
be doing is acting intelligently: There ARE answers to
this sea of migrants & refugees, and these workable
answers CAN involve humanitarian solutions that do
no harm to our own Western values, for God's Sakes:

The proper place to house/safeguard all these Syrian
[+] refugees is in Syria itself, or in all of its adjacent
Muslim countries. The West has the means to create
such safe areas for them, and to house/feed them
there, and to protect them militarily. And why the
West is not doing it ... is quite the other question.

In any case it's pointless to be afraid of the handful
of terrorist acts which might be committed by newly
arriving Muslim migrants (most terrorist acts in the
West have been & will most probably continue to be
committed by its long-term immigrants and their
descendants who are born here). No. The lesson that
history teaches us is that two peoples cannot share the
same land--It's seldom if ever happened anywhere:

It is the story of the Arab-Israeli Conflict, where the
Muslims will never concede that the Jews have a right
even to their own historically Jewish ancestral lands
because the Muslim religious texts command them to
steal them from the Jews. And even in the United
States it was necessary to fight a bloody Civil War
in order to determine whether the country belonged
to the Northerners or they allowed the Southerners
to break it up). And they lived in geographical regions
almost completely separate from each other.

A large influx into Europe of peoples who will never
become Europeans can only eventually/inevitably
likewise produce a struggle between two peoples for
the land (since, as in the United States, I doubt that
the Europeans would permit swathes of Europe to be
turned into new Muslim countries for these groups).

Note that even now the Europeans are still reluctant
to admit the Jews are as much Europeans as they
themselves, and this when European society is as much
a creation of its European Jews as it is of its non-Jews.

... Well, everywhere they come from the Muslims have
been taught to hate & hold in contempt almost every
last principle that European society holds dear... from
freedom of speech and freedom of expression, to even democracy, respect for the opinions of others however
one may disagree with them, and the startling notion
(to them) that we are ruled by the laws of Man not God's
with all the human rights which this entitles us to claim.

Do you enjoy living where you are presumed innocent?
Know this: The inextricable nexus that exists between
freedom of speech & the presumption of innocence is
what makes both of them possible (and foreordained, in
fact inevitable) in Western democracies; and anathema
in the world's tyrannies. Look at it this way...

Having proof of it, there is no difference between
saying "Islam is bad" and saying "someone is bad."

But having no proof, on the other hand, saying that
"Islam is bad" demands no more proof of its truth than
does saying "Islam is good" because it's a permissible
expression of one's opinion--and we all have a right
to our opinion about things [don't we!] whether we are
right or wrong. This is the spirit of our tradition of
freedom of speech/freedom of expression: It's lunacy
to ask that someone prove he/she has an opinion.

Saying someone is bad, on the other hand [a charge
with many levels of degrees], is obviously a personal
accusation which always demands a heavy burden of
proof from the accuser (while demanding no proofs
whatever from the accused). This is the very spirit of
our traditional presumption of innocence--that no one
need prove their innocence: We are only ever asked to
answer charges, not to defend our innocence.

In Western democracies thanking/saying the government
is bad can never be criminalized without criminalizing
the presumption of innocence along with it. Obviously
then where there is no freedom of speech no one can
ever be presumed innocent as these two principles are
inextricably tied together: Better than anything else,
we are what we think--One cannot have presumption of
innocence where freedom of speech & freedom of
expression are outlawed because then what someone
thinks is more than enough to convict him even before
he is ever asked to answer any specific charges.

That said, the 'Charlie Hebdo' cartoon proposing the
infamous drowned Syrian boy would have grown up to
be a sex criminal
is one which ought to be censored
(outlawed) because, on purpose or not, it very clearly
suggests that the murder of a child is somehow a
legitimate form of crime prevention--Whereas we all
know that to be an utterly ridiculous perversion. And,
as I said, it doesn't matter whether that was the intent
of the cartoonist any more than it matters whether the
intent of somebody firing a gun randomly out in the
street was to hit the person he/she killed: It is an act
of "reckless disregard for human life" in either case
(especially if someone actually takes up the twisted
suggestion it expresses and kills some innocent child
simply because he/she is an immigrant): Such naked
shameless legitimizations of murder, however they may
be suggested, are & forever ought to be unacceptable
& outlawed in/by any civilization worthy of its name.

Freedom of speech & freedom of expression are our
shields of defense, not our leave to do others harm.

Freedom of speech/freedom of expression do not
extend to permitting even the suggestion that harming
innocents (and/or senselessly committing crimes) is in
any way, shape, or form legitimate; and it never must.

A monolithic society (as was Europe until recently)
depends almost entirely for its civil stability upon
the consent of its citizenry. In such a society almost
anyone from a very old person to even the youngest
child is capable of disrupting the civil stability if he
or she so desires. And about the only thing keeping
the society safe from such disruptions is the fact
that so few of its citizens wish to be disruptive.

The problem with infusing into such a monolithic
society a new group of people who do not have as
big a stake in maintaining the society's traditionally-
evolved stability... is that it's far easier for such
outsiders to decide that it's not that important to
them to maintain the civil peace here (as it was in
the societies from which they came, say, as the
respect they had evolved for their old societies is
not that easily transferred to their new ones). This
is why multicultural societies demand a much greater
investment in law enforcement than monolithic ones
(including the most perfectly functioning such society
on earth, the United States). It can go from raising
a low percentage of extra policemen for every number
of new residents, to having to hire a cop for every
last one of them--which I have never heard of it
having to be done yet.

In France there are approximately 10,000 files on
potential terrorists. These are not ordinary peaceful
Muslim citizens, but Muslims whom the police are
having to watch out for in the event they commit acts
of terror. Hope they don't. But every society must
choose for itself the amount of risk it wants to run.
And why.

Senate rejects gun control amendments offered
following San Bernardino shooting

The deadliest mass shootings are always carried out
against gatherings of unarmed citizens. And those
citizens are precisely the ones whom the laws that gun-
control advocates seem to want to pass would most
effectively of all keep from legally acquiring guns.

Their argument, following massacres like the one in
San Bernardino by Islamist terrorists, always seems
to follow along the lines of, "and their weapons were
all purchased legally." [Therefore.] But this is never
followed up by the observation that had they not been
able to purchase their weapons legally they would have
no doubt acquired them through some other means:

1) does anyone really believe these Islamic Terrorists
would have been deterred in any way by having to break
the law to get their weapons? They simply got their
weapons legally because they didn't have to get them

2) but that they would have gotten them anyway is
beyond doubt:

To those who say gun-control laws will remove them
from the hands of criminals, I say: Why don't you stem
the flow of drugs from other countries first, even by
a little bit (or even try to make a dent in the TWO
MILLION immigrants walking into the country every
year) before talking about how you'll keep criminals
from importing all the guns they want. It's as if
nobody here had ever heard of Prohibition either!

It's as if gun-control advocates are not just only
satisfied with gatherings of unarmed citizens
remaining the preferred victims in these kinds of
massacres but that they also seek to keep them
permanently the victims of mass killings by law!

Why Palestinian Terrorism Now Is One of Knifings

Islam is not a religion. It is an ongoing attack on
civilization. And as such, it demands a defense of
civilization: It is not reasonable to stand by and
silently watch civilization brought down by Islam.

Religions are/should be bodies of philosophies
designed to guide souls to a just reward. Politics are/
should be bodies of philosophies designed to guide
the daily lives of men while they're on this earth.

Any overlap between these two paradigms must be
rejected outright for the simple reason that bodies of
flesh & blood are NOT compatible with religious ideals
of ANY sort: We cannot exist in either Heaven or Hell.
And anyone who tries to condemn us to either place
while we are still alive condemns us but to death and
suffering--the result of which is the history of Islam
the world over from its beginnings to this very day...

Politics is the process of elevating human beings to
their highest-possible comportment here on this earth.

A religion which tries to behave like politics warps us
into behaviors bordering on madness and delusion.

Take away the supernatural aspects of Islam, and
obviously all of the evil behavior that you see Muslims
engaging in everywhere they abide suddenly becomes
self-evident pure naked sheer empty pointless Evil
even to Muslims themselves.

Evil's sole path to victory is barred by the truths
we learn of it. Therefore the way to victory for Evil
always involves paving over all our discussions [of it]
until numb silence leaves us mute helpless victims
to its deafening plan

S D Rodrian

The Palestinian national movement turns monstrous

   Raising your children to stab other children,
   encouraging your people to shoot other people,
   celebrating death and suffering of others, is
   indeed deviant, unnatural, abnormal. All those who
   call for a state of Palestine should wonder about
   the day after. What would a state look like with
   people like that in charge? Why doesn’t the chaos
   in Gaza, in Syria, in Iraq, inhibit any American
   policymaker demanding a Palestinian state? Do we
   need another Middle East volcano? What are these
   people thinking? Unfortunately ours is a monstrous
   era, “deviating grotesquely from the natural or
   normal form or type.”

Could not have put it better myself. S D Rodrian

Five Well-Written News Articles on Free Speech and
Freedom of Expression:

Free speech is flunking out on college campuses
By Catherine Rampell

Restoring free speech on campus
By Geoffrey R. Stone and Will Creeley

The progressive ideas
behind the lack of free speech on campus
By Wendy Kaminer

George Will: Colleges have free speech on the run

Shut up and play nice:
How the Western world is limiting free speech
By Jonathan Turley

During the heights of The French Revolution the
liberal left-wingers who had gained control of France
finally culminated their mad race to establish in
fact their ideal of having Man become virtuous by
instituting The Terror (bringing their Heavenly ideals
to fruition thus here upon this corrupt world). Well?

Well... replays, reruns, rehashes of this long-since
vanished irrationality have now firmly taken root in
too many of our "liberal" schools (with the obvious
difference that instead of sending its victims to the
guillotine, here all the "little terrors" which the new
juvenile university mobs are raising (thus far) are
but only ruining careers and costing its victims jobs
and/or their once cherished & dream educations.

As it happened in the French Reign of Terror, the
current all-over-the-place mini Terrors which have
broken out in our universities seem to be longing for
some mystical Dictator, some ghastly Robespierre to
take over the job of lobbying off the heads of their
victims (so they do not have to look at their blood on
their own guilty hands). Fortunately, such a person
can never be under the present circumstances of this
great nation & the spoiled puny adolescent tantrums
these kids would have be their new Reigns of Terror.

So, where/how is it all going to end? France's own
Terror was at last brought to an end by the sheer
indignation that it raised at seeing so many obvious
innocents being guillotined. And even now we are
beginning to see "hints" of this same eventuality in
some pertinent quarters: More & more liberals and
left-wingers [themselves also once among the dreadful
"Members of The Convention" and even the highest
card-carrying "members of the committee"] are slowly
starting to realize that keeping The Terror unleashed
too long increases the possibility that they too might
be "judged not virtuous enough" and then--What!

Robespierre finally had the recklessness to speak at
the Convention against its members: "The man who has
made himself master of us all, who has paralyzed our
resolve is the very man who has just now spoken...
Robespierre!" Cambon shouted. And, "It's Robespierre!
It's Robespierre!" The accusing shouts followed from
the other previously silent voices in the Convention:
"Let Robespierre give us an account of the crimes of
the members whose death he has demanded from the
Jacobins." Their attack was so unexpectedly and so
furious that Robespierre found himself stunned, unable
to answer them--It was finally the end for The Terror.

We ourselves have no Robespierre, of course, but
in these "safe zones" our universities' little terrors
have created (where no one's allowed to disturb the
emotional indulgences of students suckling the ideal
that life's meant to bend to their own feelings & that
this harsh world should be a nurturing womb & cradle)
they've managed to recreate that monstrous being:
And just about anybody now could be brought down
by but innocently trespassing upon one of them...

Will you now bring the intolerant forces of hypocrisy
that are again trying to pass themselves off as Virtue
to heel? They're driving the new Terror shouting down
enemies real or imagined here--condemning all men
out of hand without having heard from them a word.
Or will you wait for the backlash (inevitable) to whip
'round & strike down all that you now hold dear/near?

S D Rodrian
How the left uses political correctness to censor

Always trust Evil to tell you the exact opposite of its
true purpose: The proof that "Islam is the Religion of
War" lies in its core mission, its self-acknowledged
purpose: The Jihad. Islam without the Jihad is moot.

Don't let them fool you about The Jihad, it is NOT a
mission of charity by the Muslims to bring good works
to the non-Muslims! No. It is the Islamic Mission of
world-domination & world-conquest by any & all means:
If the conquered non-Muslims agree to join them in
the Jihad they are spared (or but merely enslaved)...
otherwise they MUST BE slaughtered. Read the Koran!
Or glance upon the evidence of the 1,400 years of
blood-letting and war, relentles & never-ending, that
is every last page of the text of the Islamic history.

In order to convince Islam to abandon its core principle
of world-conquest you will need to convince Muslims
to abandon Islam itself, because without that central
core principle Islam no longer has any reason/means
to demand the sacrifices that Muslims are asked [to
surrender all liberties--and even their lives]. And then
they shall become just another group of "Europeans,"
working for personal private achievements rather than for
the Islamic Ideal of world-domination. Good luck with that!

As for changing Muslims' minds: In their warped ideology
the notion that a people destined for subjugation (as
are all non-Muslims, obviously), that any such "people"
has ANY rights whatsoever to object to the principles
of their conquerors is laughable in the extreme (and
sweetly, endearingly Christian). And, unfortunately, like
all of the civilizations which the Muslims have wiped off
this planet, and which no doubt also welcomed Muslim
refugees with open arms, the European Christians are
simply not prepared by their Christian societies even to
conceive of such naked/shameless raw barbarity any-
more than all those millions & millions of now butchered
Hindus who (incomprehensible as it is in our culture)
delivered themselves so meekly (nay, even willingly) to
their murdering Muslim conquerors and executioners
without quite understanding the evil that men do (or
probably not even bothering to try to fathom it)... and
thinking it all but the inevitable Fate ordained to them
by the gods): Their culture betrayed those Hindus--Will
our own Christian culture now betray us? I wonder.

Those Hindu masses were cut down by their unprepared
civilization, just as near-future (or maybe even present-
day) Christian masses may be by ours. Leaving only
the squalid sewers of the Muslims' slaves-of-god total
mind-control "Sharia culture" ... to be ruled by the blind
hate-&-war-inspiring ignorance of the mullahs (or the bloodthirsty brutality of the Muslim tyrants). Look! Learn.

See! Everywhere the Islamic curriculum teaches the
Muslim children to wait ... for just the right moment
to strike. Read the Koran; and listen to the lessons
being taught to the Muslim young... away from what
they are being "taught" in the European public places.

Muslim immigration and European Jewry

Never thought I'd say this, but with Muslims pouring
into Europe it may be time for Jews to start thinking
about packing it up--it may be exactly the same as when
they had to leave all those other Muslim lands... The
do-nothing-&-see-what-happens European leaders can't
even defend the European Christians (Hell, I don't even
think they understand the danger they've put them in)
... to expect them to defend the European Jews on top
of it is too much, I think. If I were Jewish and still
living in Europe I'd take out that legendary luggage
Jews keep under their beds for these such occasions
NOW and start packing it--At least, that's me because,
frankly, family is worth more than any ole principle.
For those who demand that the Europeans now must
change the secular culture they have wrenched from
Christian domination at the expense of untold blood
over a thousand years of struggle in order to respect
Muslim religious taboos (as Muslims are still obliged
to do in the Muslim lands because there they are still
the unquestioning slaves of THEIR religion): I remind
Muslims: You were the ones who chose to come to Europe
(and whether knowing -or not- the nature of European
societies is irrelevant): You did not choose to go to
an Islamic country. If now you find that you don't
like it "here" ... there are yet any number of Islamic
countries you are free to migrate to instead. But when
someone is invited to stay in a stranger's house and
DEMANDS that the home owners accept him as the
unquestioned arbiter of how the owners of that house
live there--That is the traditional recipe for disaster.
Freedoms are being walked back just only by the very
fact of Europe's growing Muslim immigrants: Do you
believe in God? Well, "daring" to express the opinion
that you don't is blasphemy; and Europeans are losing
their ability to blaspheme. At first by cowardly self-
censorship (no more Mohammads with their 'stylish'
bomb chapeaux for vous); but no doubt eventually by
force of law--And stating that "There Is No God" (in
whatever circumstance or context) is already against
the law in "some places" ... but eventually it may be
against the law everywhere, including Europe--We
certainly wouldn't want to offend Muslims' sensitivities
now? First, though, that law against Mohammad in a
bomb chapeau they're talking about: First things first.
Finally, the government has decided to eliminate pork
— from the menu in federal prisons

The difference between granting a right and denying one
is not that hard to discern: A man's freedom from having
to eat pork, for whatever reason, is his right. One. But
prohibiting those who want to eat pork from doing so
is a clear violation of their rights. Two. [See?] And: If
the prohibition is because of a religious reason then it's
clearly unconstitutional because [the prison system
being an arm of the state] it is specifically enjoined
in the American Constitution from making ("establish")
any laws for a religious reason--Is this clear enough?

Even if all the inmates of a prison are Jews & Muslims
except for one, depriving that one inmate of his right
to eat pork is still a clear violation of his right. And I
would go farther: Even if all the inmates are Jews and
Muslims, establishing any religion-based rule is still a
violation of the Constitution... whose First Amendment
clearly states:"Congress," (and by extension all of the
nation's laws-creating bodies) "shall make no law
respecting ("concerning") an establishment of religion."

In this amazingly egregious case the prison system
"establishes" that everybody must follow a particular
religion's rules--Could anything be more outrageously

Dear sirs, "the gov" cannot "establish" people's menu
because of some religious prejudice or other. Period.

            Ah, but...

  QUOTES: "the decision was based on a survey of
  prisoners’ food preferences: They just don’t like
  the taste of pork." THEN: "As of last week, the
  prison menu had added an 'economically viable'
  turkey bacon substitute."

Waitaminute! They do not like pork, but they do like
their pork-like turkey? Methinks somebody in the prison
bureaucracy's thinking everybody out there's an idiot.

   "... the Bureau of Prisons ... said the decision
   was based on a survey of prisoners’ food
   preferences: They just don’t like the taste of
   pork. [While the National Pork Producers Council
   isn’t buying it: “I find it hard to believe that a
   survey would have found a majority of any
   population saying, ‘No thanks, I don’t want any
   bacon,'” said Dave Warner, a spokesman for the
   Washington-based trade association, which
   represents the nation’s hog farmers.]"

Bet you  you know any number of Jews who'd rather
convert than turn down th'occasional ham sandwich
(especially if they're Cuban Jews). And as a Cuban
myself... let me assure you that there is no meat on
this entire earth that can beat pit-roasted pork. The
suggestion that there are people out there who'd take
corned beef over roast pork is either pure insanity or one
whoppingly preposterous barefaced lie. Guess which
this is.

As well: Anyone suggesting that this is being done to
save money and not for some religious purpose better
be ready to prove that offering an all-meat menu saves
a lot more money than serving an all-pork one. Have
you eaten at a half-way decent steak house lately?!

Reading between the lines... could all this just be
because as more and more criminals discover the
robbery-sanctioning, crime-justifying and murder-
endorsing, rape-approving nature of the Islamic
"religion" suddenly they discover pork tastes bad?

 "The prison system has long made accommodations
  for Muslims and Jews by providing alternatives to pork
  and halal and kosher foods." [BUT] "Ross declined to
  say whether there has been an increase in Muslim or
  Jewish inmates in recent years and whether that may
  have factored into the survey responses." [Guess why.]

Kerry: Fantasy to think that a better Iran deal
could have been reached

But, Mr. Kerry, that means you think a "no deal" would
have been unacceptable, and therefore you were willing
to accept ANY deal... which is what you did!

    Obama’s secret Iran deals exposed

You may not see this, but the Iranians sure did:

Worse than we could have imagined

17 ridiculous things the president said at the
Iran news conference

Iran - Reaping the storm that Barack sowed…

Blaming failure of a rotten deal on Israel?!

This is a bad deal. It is a bad deal for America, and
it is a bad deal for the entire world. And this very bad
deal has come about because of two factors: 1) Obama
will not use the American military no matter what; and:
2) America's enemies know this & know how to use it
against us.

Neville Chamberlain's "deal" with Hitler must have
once looked as good (to the liberal establishment of
their age) as this one looks to Kerry, Obama and our
present day liberal establishment--Neville also must
have called their doubters war mongers & fools. And
we just don't seem to have learned anything from that
great catastrophe about not trying to make sane deals
with the insane. But The Man of Peace is NOT that man
who takes the gun away from the victim--He is in fact
the most clear cut enabler there is of murder. Time and
time again across history men of otherwise good will have disarmed us against evil ... and time & time again we
have paid the price for their witless contempt of realities.

Could any two Americans have been a worse pick than
Kerry and Obama to negociate ANY kind of a deal with
terrorist religious fanatics? I, for one, seriously doubt it.

Obama's philosophy seems to be that abolishing the
police will teach the neighbors to defend themselves.
But the truth has always been & will always be that
most people will suffer centuries of abuse & murder
waiting for a messiah to come rescue them from their
sufferings before they ever even start thinking that
they might have to do the job themselves. Look it up.

Let's be real here: What is the so-called "occupation"
by Israel of "Palestinian lands?"

1) The Arabs who claim to be Palestinians are not
fooling anyone (except the idiots): They are either
former Jews who were forced to convert to Islam at the
point of the gun, or they are nomads & other Arabian
Arabs who have moved into the traditional lands of the
Jews quite recently.

You want to solve the Arab-Israeli conflict? Have the
former Jews return to Judaism and the Arabs return to
Jordan where they came from and where they belong.

2) The Israelis have been forced to "occupy" their
Muslim neighbors after the Muslims waged war and
unleashed relentless terrorism on them time and time
and time again.

The one certainty here is that when or if the Israelis
withdraw... their "Muslim neighbors" will follow them
and murder them to the last one. If you believe anyone
about this then believe the Palestinians themselves:
They make no bones about it. They can't: It's their

For the Jews it's either "occupation" or death because
no matter what "language of diplomacy" the Palestinians
might use for the benefit of Americans & Europeans
ignorant enough to not know any better: the Palestinians don't want to live in peace in "Palestine" --they want to
go after the Jews and butcher every last one of them. So
anybody who says that the Jews can just "go home" (and
"end the occupation") are complicit in their murder en
masse. And anybody who says he or she doesn't know
this is a bold-faced liar--no ifs, no ands, no buts.

As long as there are Muslims in Israel there will be
Intifadas there. And, as well, when there are enough
Muslims in Europe their Intifadas will begin there too
because whether in Israel or in Europe the Muslims
will never integrate into non-Muslim communities (they
can only do so by utterly ceasing to be Muslims, or by
temporarily pretending they have done so--and then
this point might be moot). Therefore, because of this,
Muslims will always struggle to survive at the fringes
of non-Muslim societies... they have not yet taken
over. And they will be angry, their religion will make
certain they remain angry AND do something about it.
DHS Secretary Won't Describe ISIS As 'Islamic' Terrorists ...

   Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson says that
   in order to keep ISIS from radicalizing Americans
   inside the United States, it is "critical” not to
   use the word “Islamic” when describing attacks or
   other actions tied to the terrorist group.

Imagine yourself a Muslim youth: Would you really not
take these terrorists to be Islamic just because the
government refuses to call them Islamic? Might you
also believe Roman Catholics dragging huge wooden
crosses up & down the street not to be Christians if
tomorrow the government also declined to call them
Christians? God! The people who come up with these
idiotic notions are the enablers of terrorism and the
authors of Western Civilization's current and future
defeats. And we, my friend, our ignorance and our
incomprehensible inaction against them, are the ones
who put them and who keep them in their position to
do us all the harm they're certainly/surely doing us.

What is the best way to promote to the young the
notion of Islamic terrorism? It is to instigate/advance
the perverted notion that "Islam is Good," because once
young people are convinced of that perverted notion
it will then be that much easier for the Jihadists to
convince them that their ideology of hate and murder
is "the real Islam" --AS IT UNDENIABLY IS. Therefore:
this is a truth which is impossible to counter in any way
shape or form: For those who have been convinced that
"Islam is Good," its central ideology of rape, murder,
human slavery, torture, merciless brutality, butchery &
death becomes that "good" they have been brought to
believe is Islam [and the flip-over is no flip at all]. As
"there is no evil so vile men will not do once they are
convinced they are doing good." Who doesn't know this!


The BDS movement is the new Anti-Semitism

And its sole purpose is to establish that Israel’s use
of force in its self-defense is inherently immoral and
illegal: "It is ... to make Israel into an international
pariah unable to wage wars of self-defense without
risking war crimes tribunals, economic boycotts and
international humiliation."

Actions speak louder than words: No matter how they
might paint-over their vile censures of Israel, it is the
same ancient Jew-hatred and old anti-Semitism which
culminated in the Holocaust. And the funny thing about
this is that the people who are really behind it all, the
Arab enemies of Israel, make no bones whatever of
their monstrous intention to carry out yet a second and
Final Holocaust on the Jews! So: Greater the disgrace
and infamy then of those who merely claim or somehow
really do believe that they are but working for the so-
called improvement of the Palestinians! Vain excuse!

George Bernard Shaw was a good and a wise man. But
when in the middle of the famine which Stalin forced
on the Ukraine Shaw was invited by the Soviets to tour
there ... he came back praising The Great Socialist
Experiment [there] so dear to his heart; even crying
out about the true nobility of Stalin--And when asked
about reports trickling past the Soviet Secret Police
about famine there, Shaw assured the world it was all
anti-Soviet lies and propaganda... hailing without the
slightest qualification the "joy" of the Soviet masses
to at last find themselves in "the Workers' Paradise,"
content, fat, happy, and fulfilled. And Bernard Shaw
walked amongst the corpses of 12 million Ukrainians
mercilessly starved to death by Stalin without any need whatever for their having to have been thus murdered!

Thus too today do otherwise good and wise people, like
Bernard Shaw then, walk among the pointless/needless
horrors [no one but Arab aggressors have unleashed] and
blame the Jews at whom such horrors were aimed just for
the Jews having defended themselves so successfully!

The South African divestment movement succeeded
because it was an attack on Evil--The BDS movement
will fail invariably because it is an attack by Evil:

Evil always appears like an unstoppable tsunami of
darkess at first sight, but always folds finally like
all of the other broken waves lapping the sunny shore.

--S D Rodrian


Jimmy Carter: Rebuild Gaza Why? To raise the spirit
of people who will use that to cause more misery,
destruction and death? No, you pathetic enabler of
: Rebuild Detroit instead, and bring some
humanity to people for a change!

“We were hoping the first anniversary of the war would
be met [with] reconstruction and not a new war,” [said
Khaled, a Gaza resident whose home in a four-story
apartment building was destroyed
]. "We are not
psychologically prepared for a new war and we still
have not recovered from the effects of the war and our
homes are still totally devastated."

This is what Jimmy Carter and others of his ilk want
to change: to get the Gazans back into the "frame of
mind" they'll require to push for/accept another war
of utterly homicidal/suicidal "attempted murder" on
Israel (and maybe ensure greater success for their
attempted butchery this time): That is what Jimmy
Carter and other clear enablers of terrorism like him
apparently refuse to understand or it just doesn't quite
disturb their conscience--And, in the end, does it really
matter which of the two explanations it is that stains
their dark lack of human morality?


Cancer is killing Jimmy Carter, shouldn't I take down
my criticism of him now? Not by a long shot: Long
after Jimmy Carter's body "lies a-mouldering in the
grave" there will be no end to the number of those who
like him think themselves far too virtuous to approve
of ANY the smallest amount of violence no matter how
monstrous an amount of violence it may prevent. And
he will forever continue to personify those people like
few others:

Hitler never intended to start WWII when he invaded
Poland, and was convinced that he would only be having
a nice little private war with Poland--Hitler was sure
that Britain and France would never go to war (because
he thought their leaders were like Obama and Kerry).

This is why Obama and Kerry are such a threat to world
peace: because, like Hitler, the leaders of America's
enemies today are just as sure as was Hitler that they
can pretty much get away with whatever evil they like
without fear America will seek to stop them. [As we
know or should, addicts can seldom stop themselves...
least of all those addicted to power and dictatorship.]
And, unfortunately, eventually all such acts of evil build
up to moments when they can be ignored no more.

We can now see with our own eyes how it came about
that the lands of the Muslims today are utter human
wastelands and sewers lacking all civilization, and who
it was did all this, and why.
 Therefore look & learn!...

Fears mount over Palmyra as IS expands territory in Syria

Forget Palmyra (it'gone, baby): What you have to do
is start making plans --NOW-- to send the contents of
the Louvre to China when the Islamists take over Paris.
(If you don't, I'll be ready with my usual: "Told you so!"

Unlike the Winners of the [ 700 years! ] struggle to
chase the Muslims out of Spain, today's Westerners are
all Wieners--& they're about to be eaten up by those
same old eternally unchanging Muslims. S D Rodrian

“You go from one brutal rule and end up with another
brutal rule,” [Syrian Dr. Bara Sarraj] said by phone. In
the article, "Palmyra, ISIS' Latest Conquest, Has Dark
History Of State Torture And Abuse
" ...

As long as the barbarians are fighting each other the
Western World ought not to take sides just to make it
easier for one brute to triumph quickly. The notion that
we can pick the gentlest barbarian is just plain nuts...
for the fact is that we must either fight ALL OF THEM or
we must fight none of them--since The West has grown
too "civilized" for the kind of work that victory requires.

Like old Byzantium, we shall stand trembling behind our
crumbling walls... until that final judgment which history
exacts on all civilizations. Then something else.

It is both cowardly and low of those in the media
(like Greta Van Susteren) to blame Pamela Geller
for "provoking" the Muslim attack on that cartoon
contest in Texas
. As Geller wrote in an op-ed for Time
the “jihadis” would have targeted another event
had they not been at her cartoon contest: "They’re
saying: ‘She got what she deserved!’ They don’t
remember, or care to remember, that as the jihadis
were killing the Muhammad cartoonists in Paris, their
friend and accomplice was murdering Jews in a nearby
kosher supermarket. Were the Jews asking for it? Did
they “bait” the jihadis? Were they “provoking” them?
Are the Jews responsible for the Nazis? Are the
Christians in the Middle East responsible for being
persecuted by Muslims

I agree with Geller that the cowardly media attack on
her encourages militants
: It's no different than when
some bully is beating up a smaller child, and instead of
standing up for the poor kid, the other brats cowardly
join in berating the victim so the bully doesn't target
them. This is the reprehensible comportment of
morally bankrupt "little" people like Van Susteren and
all those others who, like those cowardly little children
above, like to imagine themselves morally superior,
when all they really are is cowardly little children...

On Wednesday Ms. Geller posted on her blog, which is
called Atlas Shrugs: "The Islamic State wants me dead
for violating Sharia blasphemy laws. What remains to
be seen is whether the free world will finally wake up
and stand for the freedom of speech, or instead kowtow
to this evil and continue to denounce me...

   What’s really frightening and astonishing about
   this threat is that the media in denouncing me
   is essentially allying with and even cheering on
   the Islamic State. I expect this from jihadists.
   I never expected it from my fellow Americans in
   the mainstream media.”

"Geller, whose organization drew ire for anti-Islam ads
featuring Hitler
on San Francisco buses and a burning
World Trade Center in New York City subways..."

... drew ire from people who don't wish to remember
history accurately and would prefer to make up myths
& follow them to their doom, to promote the lie that a
meeting between Hitler and “one of the leaders of the
Muslim world, Hajj Amin al-Husseini”
never happened
--when we all well know that the only way to keep
ourselves from tripping over the same stumbling block
over & over & over again is to remember with absolute
accuracy exactly where the blunder tripping us lies.

Am I an Islamophobe? Absolutely! I have as much a
fear of Islam as a Jew on his way to a concentration
camp might fear the Nazis. And, frankly, I think we
are both clearly more than justified in our fears.
Anybody tells you he/she is completely unafraid of
Islam is whistling past the graveyard, because
everything one reads in the papers nowadays centers
around Muslims threatening death on you and your
family; and, worse, actually carrying out those grave
threats... sometimes with deplorable/dismal/inhuman
results. Yes there are millions of Muslims out there
living peaceful quiet lives, earning an honest living
by working in ordinary jobs, looking after their dear
families, taking out the trash & watering their lawns
... but you can also say the exact same thing about
Nazi Germans (as well as the Nazi populations of all
the other countries around Germany): SO what?!
Should you defend Nazism then against those who say
it should be banned? Think again. And for the sake of
your family: think long and hard. Study history!

   "Simpson, described as quiet and devout, had
   been on the radar of law enforcement because of
   his social media presence, but authorities did
   not have an indication that he was plotting an
   attack, said one federal official familiar with
   the investigation." Surprise!!!

Frankly you could cut & paste the above statement into
the blood-curdling "fairy stories" of every Muslim
that perpetrates an unimaginably pointless/hellish act
of carnage against the innocent on this planet [only to
satisfy some vile meaningless grotesque superstition],
changing only the name of the perpetrator--Just leave
my own "Surprise!!!" comment on it all  at their every
inevitable conclusion. [Fairy tales because they read
like something straight out of one of those homicidal
supernatural stories you find in The Brothers Grimm.]

   "A lawyer who previously represented a man
   who a federal official says was one of the
   gunmen who opened fire outside a Prophet
   Muhammad cartoon contest says the man was
   a devout Muslim and respectful of the legal

Well, thank God for that! I mean, just think of what
might have happened if he hadn't been!

"Pamela Gellar has made a career out of demonizing
Islam and Muslims," Edgar Hopida, the communications
director for the Islamic Society of North America told
: "She wants us to be second-class citizens."

Actually, all she wants is that we Americans should
not be deprived by tyrants of our ability to exercise
our freedom of speech & freedom of expression (you
know: what the Founding Fathers also wanted for us)...
common human rights which have defined this nation
as well as all modern civilized nations now for centuries:
The real question is whether ours will be the generation
which cowardly admits defeat and cries out for the
tyrant's usual mercy (of HIS choice): Read the papers.

The fact that it is religious fanatics who are so willing
to commit murder in order to deprive us of our
freedoms is both inevitable (because it is only such
criminals who would go to such an outrageous extreme
to secure their tyranny)... and, in fact, THE most
important reason why we should unhesitatingly defy
their insolent challenge & fight for our rights: For,
however bravely standing up for our rights may be
portrayed in that struggle, to decline the opportunity
to strike down such a naked question of our rights is
tantamount to conceding that no such rights exist

"What Muslims can do is invite people to learn more
about the Prophet Muhammad's life and mission," Hopida

& you can start right here: The Root of Terrorism


Phoenix Mosque Sees Anti-Islam Protesters Parading
'Muhammad Cartoon Contest'

"Todd Green, a religion professor at Luther College in
Iowa who studies Islamophobia, said that the brutal
acts committed by Islamic State and other militant
groups have colored many Americans' impressions of

Indeed: The way Muslims behave does seem to "have
colored many Americans' impressions of Muslims." [Ah!
for the days when it was so simple to push the BIG LIE
that "Islam is the religion of peace!"] ... What must be
done now apparently is to create the false impression
in the minds of Americans (& others who have recently
awaken & smelled the coffee) that Muslims are not the way
they are. Then Americans will love them again, no doubt.

"... they're not saying they want to rid America of
radical Islam, they are saying they want to rid
America of Islam," said Imraan Siddiqi [of the Arizona
chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations].

Thereby: what they're saying is that if Islam itself
got rid of its acceptance/promotion of minorities-
abusing & plundering (dispossessing them of their
traditional ethnic & religious identity, robbing them
of all they own & forcibly converting them to Islam
on pain of being pushed to the edge of starvation or
being slaughtered like beasts)... if Islam got rid of
its rape & slavery-promoting, terroristic/militaristic
world-conquering Main Mission [the Jihad], of its
brutal, mindless, barbarous & vicious torturing and
murdering for even the slightest offence ... if Islam
got rid of its Paramount Claim that robbing, raping,
and butchering their fellow human beings is their
religious duty because (well, because God told them
so) perverted/twisted character & nature... THEN the
resulting Muslim sons of such a wondrous Reformation
would surely be as welcome here in the land of freedom
and of human rights as are any other of their peaceful
& civilized neighbors--because then we wouldn't have
to live forever looking over our shoulders... ever on the
lookout for a Muslim who may suddenly become pious
enough to study his "religion" in depth and thus decide
(from that) to finally faithfully follow its true nature

But, of course, it's going to be hard to get Muslims
to tear up and burn so much of the Koran: Really.

Hundreds gather in Arizona for armed anti-Muslim

"Usama Shami, president of the Islamic center, said
he was not surprised by the event: “This is not new.
Hatred, bigotry, racism — that’s old. It’s the same
thing. No different from Nazis or neo-Nazis. They
don’t believe society should be multicultural or
multiethnic. They think everyone should believe like
them, I guess.”

You've got your protesters mixed up: Glance at the
land of the Muslims and then talk about the lack of
belief in multicultural or multiethnic societies: Note
where it is people are fleeing from & to. Count the
ever-dwindling numbers of non-Muslims left there and
the growing numbers of Muslims given sanctuary here:
You live in the greatest multicultural and multiethnic
society on earth--the anti-Islam protesters are merely
trying to keep it that way: You should be joining them.

"26-year-old Ya Ali Yoseph said he hoped people
would gain understanding about Islam and its
practices, saying of the cartoon drawing that took
place: “Of course it’s offensive. We have 124,000
prophets in Islam. Muhammed was the last prophet.
We don’t draw pictures of our prophets. Jesus was a
prophet. We don’t draw pictures of Jesus…"

The key word here is "we." You do whatever "you" want
to do & let us do what "we" want to do: You don't draw
cartoons of murderers, we do. We kneel before statues
of Mary--How would you feel if "we" threatened to kill
"you" for not kneeling before statues of Mary? And how
would you feel if everybody started saying you were a
Nazi and a Christianophobe whenever you objected to our
demands that you kneel before statues of Mary? Because
all that non-Muslims are protesting are the unreasonable
demands of Islam, not Muslims themselves.

Betcha you'd suddenly become one Hell of an advocate
of freedom of speech & freedom of expression, and of
your "right" to protest our calls for your murder because
of "your" disrespecting statues of "our" Virgin Mary.

If the God that told you that rape & robbery are good
is the same God that told you that drawing a cartoon
of Mohammed is evil, then that is definitely one god to
whom NO ONE should be paying any attention. Trust me.

"In the Koran there is a quote that says: Allah made
you different groups, different tribes, different
races, so you can go and learn from each other, so we
can come closer to each other. This is a test, to see
how you treat people of different color, different

Yeah, too bad Muslims themselves didn't pay heed to
this when they were depopulating the Levant of all the
 "different groups, different tribes, different races"
that existed there before the Islamic Genocide (which
continues everywhere to this day), and is estimated
to have cost the lives of -hundreds of millions- of
human beings wherever the Muslim has set foot in
this world since the advent of Islam's cult of death.

Here's a news-flash for you: NO ONE objects to the
niceties in the Koran--Love them! What people are
protesting is the Koran's calls to butchering and its
unrelenting bloodlust in its quest to conquer all the
world & raze -to utter oblivion- all civilization before
that of the caravan bandits & highwaymen ... Islam's
call for rape, for the promotion/legitimization of human
slavery, for robbery/theft sanctioned by God. Is this
really all that objectionable?!? And, by whom? Look at
yourself in the mirror, and then answer me that.

Instead of objecting to non-Muslims' protests against
Islam's evils & demanding that everyone only praise
Islam's niceties, why don't you too help improve Islam
by calling for the elimination of its evils yourself? No
one is asking that you stop praising Islam's niceties.

In the news item: "Curt Schilling Tweets Meme Comparing
Muslims To Nazis
" yet another Western Media outlet stuns
with its utter ignorance of history and/or its journalistic
incompetence, suggesting in its text that the reason Curt
Schilling was suspended by ESPN is because he posted a
lie about Islam!

Here are just six URLS these reporters could have easily/
briefly skimmed (if they were unfit, as are most Westerners, to actually study a few history texts):

The Greatest Murder Machine in History

1,400 Years of Christian/Islamic Struggle: An Analysis
By Richard C. Csaplar, Jr.

Killings for Islam

Tears of Jihad

Post: The Historical Reality of the Muslim Conquests

History of the Jihad against the Hindus of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh

It's starting to be about time that Hezbollah's Hassan
started thinking [they] should beg Israel to
make them some sort of client ... because the time
isn't that far away that ISIS will be knocking on its
door(s) in the middle of th'night--Otherwise Nasrallah
and the rest of Hezbollah had better start deciding
now which they like better... being burned alive or
just crucified: Those barbarian brother Muslims of
theirs can be awfully primitive, you know. And THEY
know it better than anyone. Let's see what happens.

  Theoretically.. every last citizen of every Muslim
  country on earth can qualify for political asylum.

All these migrants rushing into Europe are fleeing the
wars that Islam has unleashed in their world: They are
swamping Europe to escape the devastation of those
wars--which their own "convictions" have inevitably
produced and must forever produce even unto the very
last day they hold to all such self-damning convictions.

Unfortunately they are bringing with them the seeds of
the future selfsame wars of those religion convictions...
wars which they and/or their descendants will unleash
on Europe. [What, you thought that not abandoning the
reason for those Muslim Wars was going to abolish them?]

None of those migrant Muslim populations will EVER
be "European" in any sense: They will never embrace
democracy or accept that religions other than Islam are
its equal and should be honored and respected. They
will never embrace freedom for women. They will never
espouse for gays anything but murder. They will never
embrace brotherhood with non-Muslims, least of all for
Jews. They will never abandon the Islamic ideal of world-
conquest (conversion or death). They will never live in
peace with their neighbors, Muslims or not... because
the central ideal of Islam is turning the entire world into
whatever cult, sect, shade or manner of Islam they might
happen to have been born into... Shia, Sunni, Ahmadiyyas,
Sufis, Baha’is, Druze, Alawis, and God-only-knows how
many others... ALL of which are convinced to their death
that God has created man [themselves] to conquer the
entire world for their own particular sect ... whichever!
[Muslims are about the only religious cult which still preaches
that the highest ritual God demands of us, and therefore
rewards above all others, is human sacrifice & murder.]

Therefore none of the Muslim migrant populations pushing
into Europe will EVER really become European. The only thing
which can result from admitting them into Europe is to
eventually/inescapably turn Europe into a sort of greater/
vaster/bloodier Syrian or Central African Republic conflict.

There's a terrible tragedy going to happen in that place: the
Germans who are welcoming all those Muslim migrants really
do believe them to be like some sort of Swiss or something;
and it's all going to end up in a quite predictably bloody mess
when they finally discover what they truly are. But, of course,
this is not something which is politically correct to say. And
the adorably liberal Europeans will not admit its truth until
it is far too late and they are "inexplicably" being butchered
in their homes... by their neighbors! [But they were all so
generously welcomed by them in their hour of need!] Yes.
That's always a comforting thought, of course. (For now.)

There is an old Cuban saying which applies here: "El que
por su gusto muere, la muerte le sabe a gloria." Or: "Death
tastes like Glory to those who die the death they have chosen
for themselves." And this is why I feel more a sort of detached
fascination than pity or even sympathy for this terrible self-
inflicted fate which the Europeans seem to have unquestionably
chosen for themselves. It's so interesting, almost entertaining!

I do agree that the Middle East migrant crisis was
primarily caused by European and well-intended but
idiotic ignoramuses like G.W. Bush, Barack Obama, and
others like them. Dear sirs all: Islamic countries are
either unimaginably harsh dictatorships (as many there
once were there & will be) or they are volatile places
of chaos & bloodshed (as many there are there now),
but they are never (never have been & never will be)
stable Western style secular democracies--Turkey tried
to be one after WWI, but, as expected, Erdogan is now
slowly turning it into the typical Islamic tyranny
which must inevitably result once the secular
dictators are overthrown in any Islamic country, again
as a direct result of hopelessly misguided/ignorant
Western expectations that democracy would make Turkey
into a stable Western style secular democracy)...

The Muslim populations now running into Europe really
do believe that it is not Islam which is at the root
of the evil that sweeps their old homes but only a few
evil men, therefore wanting nothing more than to
create a new Muslim Europe free of such evil men...
completely and totally believing that destroying
democracy in Europe with its permissive and "sinful"
liberal human rights (instituting a "pure" Sharia free
of secular Islamic tyrants) will finally give them the
peace and prosperity, ethical/moral stability sold to
them by the Islamic propagandists who damned them in
the first place back home--Without once realizing the
utter foolishness of their self-made past and future
catastrophe. And they will inexorably push (even unto
the death) for this monstrous folly: No amount of
education or indoctrination will tear this folly from
them. And Islam punishes with instant/immediate death
any the least thought of "conversion" away from it

The Europeans, even without American help, had the
military might to create "safe zones" in the Middle
East, protecting them with their militaries, while
supplying them with their modern transportation
systems & technologies... so that these refugees from
the wars there might find refuge until all such wars
settled down--but it would have cost a little money
and required a little imagination, and taken a bit of
knowledge & wisdom. Fine. None such was forthcoming.
Now everyone will have to pay more: much/much more.
Always the great inevitable price of all such ignorant
Dempsey Reassures Israel It Will Keep Military Edge

Hey, Israelis: NEVER EVER trust your life to someone
whose JOB it is to assure you that you should trust
your life to him! [People change jobs soon as a better
one comes along...] Obama's job will soon be up too.

Modern Militaries' Problem In Urban Warfare

The solution to this problem is obviously the mass
production of small drone "smart munitions" that can
get to their targets with explosives powerful enough
to destroy them but still sufficiently concentrated
not to produce widespread additional "collateral"
damage. This must invariably detail either remote
human pilots or, preferably (because of costs, et al)
AI technologies which will allow the drone itself to
zero in on a specific "nature" of the target (much as
a hound does when it sniffs out a specific human
scent... which in this case could be explosives
residues or other weapons-specific scents and/or
other "military characteristics"). In the next years
and decades these little bots will develop astonishing
abilities to work with each other and to carry out
individual missions
, eventually actually becoming the replacement technology of choice for the field soldier.

It may be argued that the accuracy of modern-day
artillery is the equal of such "small AI drone
munitions," but drone weapons is a direction which
is impossible for modern militaries to avoid (so it's
pointless to try to outlaw them: both Hezbollah and
Hamas have already executed drone attacks against
Israel... and such attacks are invariably going to
increase in number and sophistication). So it's best
for Israel and the U.S. to not fall behind in this
upcoming important battlefield technological evolution.

Saudi king vows to punish those behind suicide attack

How? They're dead. Well, here's a way: The reason they
are committing suicide is because they think they will
go up to "Paradise" to rape young virgins--so block
their travel visas. And you can do this... by carefuly
gathering up their remains and sewing them into pig
carcasses. [ Jews and Muslims can certainly hire
Christian funeral workers to do this. ] Then burying
the bag somewhere where nobody ever finds it again.

It may not deter every last suicide bomber, but if it
deters even just one... it will be well worth a try.
Otherwise you can simply enjoy the spectacle of all
those suicide bombers, and not mind the casualties.

Pope Francis On Charlie Hebdo: 'You Cannot Insult
The Faith Of Others'

Well, maybe not in the Vatican dictatorship, but in a
modern-day democracy like that of the United States it
is pretty well understood that when a government bans
speech or personal expression which insults someone,
anyone, for whatever reason, it has assumed the power
to ban just about any speech or personal expression it
likes, whenever it likes, for whatever reason it wants
--therefore the absolute general severe permission
of {all} speech and personal expression {of the press}
embodied in the First Amendment of the Constitution:

  "Congress shall make no law respecting an
   establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free
   exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of
   speech, or of the press; or the right of the people
   peaceably to assemble, and to petition the
   Government for a redress of grievances."

There IS personal expression/speech which is unlawful
and should be so... but these are NEVER those which
merely offend the easily offended (or the predictably
inclined to be offended): Speech which threatens to
harm others, or which promotes harming others ought
to be banned
, and those who engage in such threats
and the promotion of violence should be prosecuted.
But this has nothing to do with freedom of speech,
freedom of expression, or freedom of the press: Such
threats, advocacy of harming others, and support for
murderers & terrorists are just plain old-fashioned
crimes (under any definition you'd care to put forth).
They are material help to/in the commission of crimes.

And, my dear Pope, to try to confuse one thing with
the other is an unconscionable attack on the freedoms
which are at the very core of human liberty and the
preservation of those human rights, democracy, and the
protection of law which have been so dearly won over
many centuries of struggle against the self-evidently
undying trends/pulls in our humanity towards tyranny.

  Any opinion which goes against yours is ALWAYS
  offensive (to you). So stop paying so much attention
  to those who are offended by the opinions of others
 --They're idiots & they're trying to make you one too:

... several legal scholars argued that perhaps we should
rethink the permissibility of releasing such offensive
material as the “Innocence of Muslims,” bound as it was
to trigger a violent reaction...

Translation: When those offended are willing to commit
a crime against those who offended them, then the law
should step in and ban all things which might cause
[them] offense:

The result would be wholesale censorship by whoever
has the power to do so. It shifts the onus from trying
to get the intolerant to reason ... to getting those
who are tolerant to accept the reasonableness of
intolerance. Is this really what we want?

Maybe it's just me, but it seems to me that we should
be moving more in the direction of becoming more
tolerant, and away from being as intolerant as we now
are. But maybe I am a solitary voice in this respect.
For, the idea that I should be forced to tolerate you
while you are free to not tolerate me seems to me the
basis only for some inevitable explosive conclusion
down the road... one a lot worse than any present
disagreements we are now having over the merits
of seeking the fairness in our ongoing relationships.

S D Rodrian

"Freedom of speech must come with responsibilities,
 and this means..."

... that there must be no freedom of speech, of course.

 For "freedom of speech" doesn't mean one must only
 say things which no one will find offensive. No!
 Freedom of speech means one can say whatever one
 wants/needs to say regardless of who might feel
 insulted by what is being said--Were this not the
 case, then the very idea of "freedom of speech"
 needing protection would be utterly pointless, and
 ridiculous in fact: The very fact that we acknowledge
 that "freedom of speech" requires protection is proof
 sufficient of whom it needs protection from--namely,
 from those who find the speech personally insulting.

The only speech which should not be tolerated is that
which thwarts or denies freedom of speech itself.
Failure to counter hate speech with reason should
never justify suspension of freedom of speech itself:
The problem lies in confusing "actions" with "speech."
It is more often the case where allowing hate speech
leads to action against hate... than that hate speech
itself convinced anyone of the soundness of hate.

Freedom of speech (specifically, the protection of
even the worst kinds of "hate speech") can often be a
very good warning against what people's moods are [not
what they might be turned into by the hate speech
itself]. Averting an unsuspected catastrophe.

Moreover, here's the real rub: Those who restrict
"freedom of speech" restrict the speech they hate, not
hate speech. Yes: unfortunately, it is the wicked who
foremostly advocate against "hate speech" (as they
define it)... unfortunately all too quickly joined by
fools to whom, without thinking it through, banning
"hate speech" sounds like a jolly good proposition.

Are there instances where freedom of expression/
freedom of speech ought to be curtailed/infringed?
Absolutely: Yes! We all know the celebrated & accepted
reasonable/logical instances (like shouting "Fire!" in a
crowded theatre, et al); but there are also many more
egregious cases, certainly like that of former Umm
el-Fahm mayor Raed Salah
in Israel, a Hamas front
-man who is in the business of advocating not dialogue
& the discourse of differing ideas but violence and the
most reprehensible forms of dehumanizing racism.

But know this: When good people advocate restricting
freedom of speech they are acknowledging that there is
no good answer to Evil's arguments. And that is deadly.

In his treatise, Dr Andre Oboler seems like a man who
obviously "knows" which speech is evil, and who just as
obviously thinks he's going to be in the committee that
determines which speech is evil--Good luck, littleman!
Sometimes you're not free to call terrorists "savages."
(But, of course, Jihadis are not savages--read here ).
It must be that blowing up babies & their mothers isn't
an act of barbarism anymore or considered "savage"
in today's "more civilized" tolerant & liberal societies.

Sorry, Dr Oboler, but denying the Holocaust is legal
in the U.S. And I just don't see America being the
leading voice in the world denying the Holocaust. note 1
And it is impossible to avoid the fact that every
justification we can offer for censoring others is
also a justification we grant others to censor us

And, for those who might imagine that the NAZIS were
proponents of freedom of speech, let me assure them
that the Nazis were the principal opponents of speech
opposing theirs (which is NOT the same thing): If you
cringe at speech advocating the bludgeoning of babies,
will listening to such speech make you more eager to bludgeon babies? [In any case, is the discrimination between Good and Evil really such a bad thing?]

There should come a point at which freedom of speech
is separated from real damages inflicted on a person:
There should be no law against the freedom to insult
(or lie about) a person, but there should be penalties
for & consequences to those "real" damages inflicted.
And I say "real" because while I would not consider
embarrassment to be actionable, I would if it directly
led to a loss of moneys, properties, health, or life.

However, note that more often than not the person
directly causing those "real" losses has no connection
whatsoever to the person accused of originally
insulting or libeling the victim: If a bank turns down
your loan because of someone's lie, then it ought to
be the bank's responsibility to explain why it took
the lie as truth--The bank owes you. If the liar owes
anything to the bank then let the bank recover from
the liar. Although I suspect a court would hold that
the bank had a responsibility to determine the truth
on its own, without giving any credence to the liar.

But, to suggest (as Dr Oboler does in his text) that
curtailing/restricting freedom of speech is a "human
right" turns reason on its head: It makes a virtue out
of a sin, and an absolute wrong into a dubious right!

S D Rodrian

"... it is absolutely a problem to hold radical views
which legitimize blowing up innocent people or
decapitate others because they hold different beliefs

You do see the problem with this, don't you: Are we
going to have to go around asking people what they're
thinking so we can then punish the "wrong sort of
thinking" ... when they confess it to us? How are we
even to prove that they were really thinking it--that
they were really guilty?!? Maybe they merely lied to
us (for whatever reason): sometimes people are just
capricious and/or contentious contrarians). SDR

What Is Behind Europe's Rising Islamophobia?

   "What is feared today is not the loss of any
   particular country to foreign conquest, but the
   loss of an imagined entity that binds us together.
   The Occident is a central piece of our mental maps
   and our cultural inventory. In a very visceral sense,
   Europeans are seized by fears of decline and
   by memories of cultural blossoming. Those fears
   culminate in the belief that our cathedrals will
   eventually turn into mosques, that their bells will
   fall silent and will be replaced by the cries of
   the muezzin." Alexander Görlach

Oh, and, of course, this has never happened in all of
recorded history, right?... May I remind you that the
place where Christianity originated and flourished for
centuries is now in the process of being completely
emptied of its last Christians
--We are the generation
which will witness the last remaining Christians there
either murdered or entirely run out of the Middle East
to the last one (with the glaring exception of Israel,
unimaginably ironically the one country there most
despised by the Christians of Europe): The Christians
of Egypt and Turkey are under dire pressure and will
soon either emigrate or be forced to convert to Islam.

No doubt long ago, when the Levant was mostly the
secure land of Christianity ... and Islam was still a
small cult of inhuman criminal highwaymen murdering,
raping and robbing caravans on the outskirts of their
societies... the Christians of those once great (and
now razed) civilizations also found it as improbable
or downright impossible to imagine that their Churches
could one day be turned into mosques, their church
bells silenced
--Now go visit the once "greatest church
in Christianity" (Istanbul's Hagia Sophia)... indeed
converted into a mosque by the Muslims, and later into
a museum by the secular Turkish regime which today's
Turks are slowly turning back into an Islamic tyranny.

After the Charlie Hebdo attack:

Of course, now that journalists have been cast into
the front trenches you will see their newspapers'
headlines screaming: "Follow us! Liberty! Freedom!
Equality! Solidarity! Unity!" like whistling past the
graveyard, plus a thousand other self-embarrassing
cries of false courage (where once they might have
been content to promote political correctness and the
most craven self-censorship, as they were not the
principal targets of Islamic terror themselves), and
sitting around their news desks shamelessly passing
themselves off as THE experts on Islam, mouthing Saudi
propaganda about it being "the religion of peace, of
tolerance, of love, and all things sweet and gentle."

This in face of the fact that all Islamic terrorists
not only claim their acts of terror are commanded by
the Koran [8.12] but specifically cite the Prophet's
order to carry this out: "God Almighty has ordered us
to terrorize his enemies," reads an al-Qaida training
manual from Afghanistan): "And in compliance with
God's order and his Prophet's order..." VISIT:

How might it have sounded had the victims of NAZI
Germany said their attackers didn't understand Nazism,
that they were "perverting" Nazism, that true Nazism is
about the politics of love, of tolerance, of humanity...?!?

  "This has nothing to do with religion." Scream the
   politically-correct leftist liberal media.

  "This is not a war against religion but a war against
   terrorism." The politically-correct leftist liberal
   politicians assure us.

Who out there could possibly not know that these are
the utterances of complete morons

  "The war in Syria is one of democracy-seeking
   freedom-loving peoples against tyranny."

Oh sure, of course: It is an incomprehensibly complete
coincidence that all of Assad's supporters are Shia and
all those trying to topple him are Sunni.

Or perhaps the self-evident and obvious IS the truth,
after all... and those who are trying so desperately to
deny it are self-deluded liars

Hopefully, now (will?) the West finally understand
exactly how dangerous & self-defeating all this insane
and utterly inane political correct nonsense really is?

If the so-called liberal Left fears the rise of the right-
wing parties what they should do is NOT to ban
people's freedom to express their views (whatever)
but, on the contrary, to strengthen freedom of speech,
freedom of expression, and freedom of the press...
this to insure that they themselves will always have
the ability to voice their side of things no matter which
party may come to power. Trying to clamp down on
opponents does nothing but justify those opponents
camping down on them once they come to power
themselves. Why people don't see this simple truth
I will never know!

The proper response to the Charlie Hebdo attack is
not to rush blindly following after our suddenly militaristic
"journalist generals" out into the battlefield opening
before us... at their momentary call (whatever).

The proper response to the Charlie Hebdo attack is
the strengthening of the very thing it was aimed to
destroy, namely freedom of expression & freedom of
speech... in the form of an Europe-wide set of laws
which, like those of the American First Amendment,
forever after enshrine unqualified into law those
sacred and irrevocable human rights. --S D Rodrian

Marches & demonstrations for tolerance are once again
raging across Europe in reply to the handful of PEGIDA
demonstrations. Nice... But it would be a stint nicer
still if there were just a few marches for tolerance
in the Muslim world. You know, instead of the usual
ones there calling for butchery, vengeance (and the
usual murder of Jews, of course). Even one or two.

This time of the year it's certainly heart-warming
to see Europe's welcoming of immigrants personified
by the sight out in its streets of greater & greater
numbers of soldiers wielding machineguns replacing
the traditional and now certainly passé Santas. I am
not against immigrants (being one myself). But I am
against immigrants from the 13th Century* who then
do everything within their power to drag their host
nations back into the bitterly brutal dark ages they
have themselves just escaped! This IS a crime.
                              * Before the European Renaissance.

Islam is incompatible with democracy & always will be
no matter what any/all the enablers of the creeping
destruction of democracy at its hands may tell you.

If the Germans need immigrants as they say: there are
no end to immigrants in Mexico & South America, in
central Africa, in Asia and elsewhere--Immigrants who
are not only NOT against cultural assimilation into
Germany but desperate to assimilate. For Germany &
other European nations to continue to import peoples
who will not only NEVER assimilate culturally but will
ALWAYS be looking for ways to subvert and even topple
& destroy all the values, principles, and human rights
Europeans have grown to hold dear & precious is both
suicidal and totally/completely unnecessary (stupid).

Anti-Islam Rally in German City Dresden Canceled
Over Threat

Well, now that Islam has succeeded in banning "the
right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to
petition the Government" in Germany. I wonder which
other hard-won democratic rights Islam will succeed in
banishing from Europe... and elsewhere?

Netanyahu DID Give A Plan of Action.

Obama needs to provide real answers to Netanyahu’s arguments.

Why Is There a BDS Movement Only For The Jews?

'Arab League to submit timetable for an end to Israel's
  What a colossal/idiotic waste of time!

It is not any so-called 'Israel's occupation' that is
the problem: The reason that 'Israel's occupation'
(so-called) is required & inevitable is that the Jews
of Israel want to escape being butchered by their
Muslim neighbors: No matter what Muslims (and those
in the West who woudn't at all mind if all the Jews
were murdered to the last one, and/or even some of
the most religious/suicidal Jews) say... the Israeli
military is not in the West Bank because it wants to
conquer the Palestinians but because the Palestinian
Muslims have been brainwashed by the toxic cult of
Islam into believing that it is their religious duty to
slaughter the Jews (and then every other non-Muslim
they can get their hands on--that's you & me, my
brother): Get the Palestinians to evict this maniacal
insanity out of their heads and the reason for the
so-called "Israel's occupation" will be utterly and
completely evicted from their world once & for all.

Outside of the few crazies in every group, even the
most extremist Israelis seek neither the genocide nor
ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians: The most right-
wing and/or religious fundamentalist Israelis go no
further than the reestablishment of Jewish sovereignty
over the traditional Hebrew lands of history--And they
will only get this if the Palestinians continue their
stubborn & self-defeating fixation on uncompromising
religious cleansing of all-but-Muslims in "Palestine."

The practice of one group of Muslims declaring another
group of Muslims heretics and "not true followers of
the Prophet" or condemning them as "perverters of the
true Islam" continues to this day, and has now morphed
into a truly whacky co-conspiracy with the mainstream
Western Media
... in a vain attempt to portray the most
virulently inhuman Islamic practices of ISIS that way!
Never ceases to amaze me--NOT the eternal attempts of
one group of Muslims to delegitimize another group of
Muslims [which has been ongoing since the Sunni/Shia
split 1400 years ago] BUT the folly of our mainstream
Western Media to be played now by Muslims by the way
the wind happens to be blowing (at this time: against ISIS
because of its so very public too too faithfulness to the
perverted inhumanities of Mohammed--which SEE) into
participating in this evil despicable ancient interreligious
conflict amongst Muslims... that should stay with them.

The Machinery of Muslim Propaganga NEVER sleeps!

Listen to this monstrous pile of Islamic propaganda
recently pushed on an unsuspecting American public
by one Mohammed Zaher Sahloul, past president of
the Council of Islamic Organizations of Greater Chicago
in no less a publication than The Washington Post:

 "The image of Muhammad in the minds of Muslims is
  of a pious, simple man who understood people’s
  limitations. He was {ahem} gentle, humble, loving, witty
  and accommodating. He asked his followers to respect
  every life—even the lives of animals and plants. {!!!}
  He said that the life of one person is more sacred
  than the holiest place on earth. He forgave his
  enemies, even those who killed and desecrated the
  dead body of his uncle. He savored the company of
  slaves and the disenfranchised. He denounced racism
  and championed social justice. He told men to honor
  women and not to hurt them." {I'm not trying to be
funny, this is a verbatim quote--Look it up yourself.}

I guess he must be thinking of some other Mohammad
(you know, NOT the one with the bomb turban, or the
dog one snarling viciously at us, or the pig one screwing
the world... we are now all too familiar with):

And certainly not the Mohammad who personally ordered
the slaughter to the entire Medina Jewish community
down to the last baby (but who, when even his most
bloodthirsty henchmen objected to the usual Islamic
slaughter Mohammed personally instituted {and which is
faithfully observed to this day by ISIS, the Saudis, and
all other Muslims who don't really care to feign humanity
for the sake of the Civilized World--that's idiots like you--},
agreed to allowed the children who had not yet sprouted
pubic hairs to live... as slaves or converts to his cult of
butchery & death. {Yes, nice guy, Mohammed, Mister
Sahloul! Why, it's almost as if you were talking to illiterate
multitudes with no access whatever to history books...}

One must suppose it is some total/complete coincidence
that EVERYWHERE the Media looks it finds Muslims
Jews, Christians, Atheists, and all others
(including, of course, other Muslims who don't follow
the right sort of Islam, for, as long as you're butchering
people, why be picky?). But then, as Obama might say, Christians also loved to butcher others like this... what,
a thousand years ago?... I guess Obama must have
missed the memo. You know, the one that reads: "Yes,
that is precisely the point about Islam being so bad
--that its core principles & values are those of a dead
world we imagined we'd buried a 1,000 years ago!"

A world where human life was worthless, a world of
interminable conquest by force of arms in which there
was no questioning that Might Is Right, a world of
butchery everywhere one looked, of human slavery
both of body and mind {Saudi Arabia finally abolished
legal human slavery but months ago
}, a world of rape
and torture even unto death, or stoning, of chopping off
hands for small infractions and lobbing off fingertips as
moral & civic lessons {if -for whatever reason- ANYONE
accuses you of blasphemy in Pakistan today you might
as well cut your own throat, since judges there cannot
hear a legal defense against such a charge BECAUSE IT
IS BLASPHEMY to hear it of course
}. And it is not just
savage, brutal, barbaric societies like ISIS, Al-Qaida,
Pakistan, Sudan, Libya, soon Turkey, and Saudi Arabia
that practice these malignancies of the soul, no: These
inhumanities are enshrined in Sharia (the "Islamic Law"
so many "moderate, mainstream" Muslims long to
put into general practice {and have already done so
here & there} not only in sewers like North Africa,
Pakistan, and the Middle East but also in Europe and
the United States {starting "innocuously" by instituting
it as "legal & valid" for their inner Muslim communities
"only"}. So get ready for the coming of the New Dark
Ages... as the Muslim populations increase where U R."

The shamelessness of Islam's apologists knows no bounds:

"In fact, as Beevor explores, echoes of [ISIS's] creed can
be found in a militant group that's decidedly non-Islamic
the Lord's Resistance Army, an outfit formed two-decades
ago by the notorious Ugandan warlord Joseph Kony."

I'm sorry, but: Is there any innovation in ISIS from
Mohammed's practices?  Islamic Terrorism   If there is
then someone should tell the ISIS foot soldiers about
this sacrilege of theirs. Strange, don't you think, that
1400-year-old Islamic terrorism should be but an echo
of a two-decades old central African guerrilla movement!

On the other hand: Do you know of anything remotely
in common between the practices of Joseph Kony and
those of Jesus?

I think that should tell you everything you need to know
about just how truly monstrously shameless the apologists
of Islam can be. [Knowing the West's free-flow-of-ideas
has been so warped out of shape in their favor that even
the biggest media outlets nowadays think nothing of force-
feeding the Western public portrayals of Mohammed the
butcher as even more Jesus-like than Jesus!] So beware!

Rabbi David Rosen: Don't Blame Muslims For The Paris
Terror Attacks

        I don't blame Muslims, I blame Islam.

I specify the distinction to avoid the accusation that
those who point out that Islam is the problem are
racists & so that thereby those Muslims who reject the
bloodlust in their religion will not be blamed for it.

It would be nice if the greater part of Muslims openly
rejected Islam's bloodlust, but I suppose it is nice
that all Muslims don't engage in terrorism. However,
I will never cease pointing out the old dictum about
how The Only Thing That Evil Needs To Succeed Is
For Good Men To Do Nothing. (Perhaps that is the First
Lesson which should be taught in every Muslim school

And, yes: It is true that many if not most Muslims are
honest decent people. But it's just as true that even the
most decent/honest Muslim harbors beliefs which are
a mortal danger to democracy and to all our human
rights--Should we ignore those clear & present dangers
simply because honest/decent Muslims do not wish to
have a frank and open discussion about them? I think
not. It is Man's imperative to bring the truth into the
light of day... so that it may stamp out the darkness
wherever it hides, and no matter who may be hiding it.

Listen to how the chickenhearted Western Media hints
at the truth of what I'm telling you straight out: "Some experts argue that the fundamentalist brand of Islam practiced by both [Saudis & ISIS] has theological links..."

It is utterly ridiculous to try to promote the false
notion that "social, economic and political forces
within Muslim societies and in relations between the
west and the Muslim world contribute to Islamic
terrorism" when Muslims of every ilk, both criminals
and otherwise honest citizens, both rich and poor,
both politically active & those not a whit interested
in politics become Islamic terrorists. The one thing
all Islamic terrorists have in common is that they
all are to a one pious Muslims: The secular Islamic
terrorist simply does not exist, and no manner of
liberal Western tripe will ever make one of'em real.

Calling for a democratic Islam is like calling for a
racially-inclusive Nazism
: Just as either racism is or
it isn't, either democracy is or it isn't ... for
something can never be its opposite. And Islam was
born of everything that is the opposite of democracy.

"In reality, the vast majority of Muslims reject
violence." The problem is that the vast majority of
Muslims are born into historically ignorant and
impoverished Islamic societies with most paths to
education politically and economically restricted
(some of the most committed Islamic terrorists tend to
be amongst the most highly educated Muslims):
Therefore, for the most part, the vast majority of
Muslims neither understand nor are even cognizant of
the true depraved nature of Islam. Inevitably, some of
them become devout enough to look into their religion,
and that's when a majority peaceful Muslim suddenly
turns into a vicious blood-thirsty terrorist according
to Islam's true dictums, becoming convinced that his
path to Paradise entails his suicide in the process of
murdering the non-Muslims around him. There is no
getting around this fact without getting rid of Islam
itself, like it or not. Offend whomever it may offend.

Is it really reasonable to expect or to demand that
Muslims remain forever ignorant of their religion,
that they never open the Koran, that they listen only
to government-sanctioned imams especially trained to
sprout only 21th Century Western propaganda about the
core values of Islam being identical to those of
Christianity & about how Mohammed was more Jesus-like
even than Jesus?!?  Islamic Terrorism

This is why calling for a democratic Islam is like
calling for a racially-inclusive Nazism: Just as
either racism is or it isn't, either democracy is or
it isn't ... for something never can be its opposite.

There are no reasons whatsoever outside Islam itself
to justify Islamic terrorists' practice of the Islamic
bloodlust, none. Thereby, the next time you hear a
facilitator of Islamic terrorism, whether a deliberate
or a deluded one, promoting the self-evident lie that
Islamic terrorism has a cause other than Islam you
will know them for the traffickers of lies they are.

As long as these fools keep insisting that Islam is
OK, that it's perfectly acceptable to become a Muslim,
because it's "only the most radical extremist deviant"
forms of Islam that are bad... young men are going to
keep being turned into monstrous militant terrorists.

Stop the process in the bud: It is Islam itself that's
the problem, and not just only some fundamentalist
version or other of it.

S D Rodrian

Far-right anti-immigrant sentiment hits German streets

  “I see these Pegida people now and I think, did
   they learn nothing from our history?” [he said]
  “Germany now must be a place of acceptance
   and tolerance.”

Meaning: We must now tolerate murderers, rapists,
torturers... those who kidnap & enslave the helpless,
who punish the sick & the infirm with brutality and
inhumanity; and we must accept people whose religion
is world-conquest... therefore unending war & the ruin
and destruction of civilization & the rights of man?

Well, I for one, do not agree: We either fight/oppose
unstintingly with all our strength those who, without
regard to what they may call themselves, practice evil
or we must become their victims: To forbid a thorough
investigation of people's beliefs & practices is sheer
insanity for any society, the suicide of civilization.

Whether they call themselves religious, or are members
of ethnic minorities, or are the refugees of foreign
conflicts, people must be judged (not by who they are
but) by what they practice--And you can't know what
they are practicing unless & until you do a thorough
and complete investigation of their practices.

   Just as not all fraternities practice the same
   principles, not all religions practice the same

And it is neither immoral nor unprincipled to examine
the beliefs and principles of any or all of them. What
is both foolish and suicidal is to NOT investigate
groups like the Nazis just because we ought not to
investigate groups like the Girl Scouts: The fact that
the Girl Scouts are a group does not make all groups
LIKE the Girl Scouts.

"Though the motive is still unclear, Sweden’s justice
minister, Morgan Johansson, said that it was hard to
ascribe [the Mosque arson] to anything other than
hatred toward Muslims as a group, and Islam as a

In Europe, and elsewhere in the West for that matter:
when Muslims are targeted it is always assumed that it
is because they are Muslims (whether it later turns out
to have been the case or not). And yet when Muslims
target others, even when they themselves claim that it
was entirely because of their religion, this is almost
always the last thing assumed--And oftentimes never
acknowledged at all, no matter what evidence turns up
to support it (as with the case of Maj. Nidal Hasan
in the United States ... and elsewhere that Islamic
militants have committed unconscionably horrific
murders without any justification whatever outside the
appalling Quranic requirements of Islam THEY cite for
their actions). In most cases the authorities simply label
them as "lone wolf lunatics" who suddenly went insane
one day without any possible explanation whatsoever!

How do we hope ever to put an end to a disease killing
people right & left when we refuse to acknowledge that
it even exists at all?!?

Why fighting Islamic Terrorism will have to wait until
after Barack Obama's presidency is over. From Thomas Friedman's How ISIS Drives Muslims From Islam:

A former Muslim addressed President Obama...

“Dear Mr. President, I must tell you that you are
wrong about ISIL. You said ISIL speaks for no
religion. I am a former Muslim. My dad is an imam.
I have spent more than 20 years studying Islam.
... I can tell you with confidence that ISIL speaks
for Islam. ... ISIL’s 10,000 members are all Muslims.
... They come from different countries and have one
common denominator: Islam. They are following
Islam’s Prophet Muhammad in every detail. ... They
have called for a caliphate, which is a central
doctrine in Sunni Islam.”

He continued: “I ask you, Mr. President, to stop being
politically correct — to call things by their names.
ISIL, Al Qaeda, Boko Haram, Al Shabab in Somalia,
the Taliban, and their sister brand names, are all
made in Islam. Unless the Muslim world deals with
Islam and separates religion from state, we will never
end this cycle. ... If Islam is not the problem, then
why is it there are millions of Christians in the
Middle East and yet none of them has ever blown up
himself to become a martyr, even though they live
under the same economic and political circumstances
and even worse? ... Mr. President, if you really want
to fight terrorism, then fight it at the roots. How
many Saudi sheikhs are preaching hatred? How
many Islamic channels are indoctrinating people and
teaching them violence from the Quran and the hadith?
... How many Islamic schools are producing generations
of teachers and students who believe in jihad and
martyrdom and fighting the infidels?”

Japanese-born politician tells Czechs to walk pigs near mosques

QUOTE: "As part of his recommendations, Okamura, 42,
suggested that Czechs 'breed dogs and piglets as pets
and walk them near their neighborhoods and mosques.'"

I cannot know what Okamura meant by this, of course,
but certainly here in the U.S. many people keep dogs
AND pigs as pets. And I believe they probably feel
that it is well within their rights to walk their pets
wherever they feel like walking them without having to
feel intimidated by the prejudices of their neighbors
against their pets... be they religious or just plain
regular everyday crazy personal prejudices.

QUOTE: Okamura goes on to state: "Keep in mind the
fundamental truth that they have no tolerance for us
and they are here as guests. So I have no moral
obligation to be tolerant and generous to them."

And, this, on the whole, seems to me to be not so
much racist as judicial (self-evidently NOT so much
proactive as proportionate or reciprocal). In purely
Christian philosophy, on the other hand, Luke's [31:6]
advise is exactly the opposite of Okamura's judicial
opinion: Luke's advise is that if Muslims mistreat
us we in turn treat them even better still (than we
might have normally done). And Jesus himself tells us
[Matthew 7:12] the same thing; namely, that if you
wish to get Muslims to treat you well then you should
first go out of your way to treat them well yourself!
You know: preempt their chopping off your head with a
little gift of some kind (a fruit cake, say), or maybe
wash one of the fellows' feet, like Pope Francis: Yes!
That'll show them.

... In no time at all they shall become civilized and
you'll see them wandering around the Louvre admiring
all the pieces in there the Quran says should be burnt
to ashes & chopped into rubble for the glory of Allah.

   Those people who insist that we should guard
   the Louvre against the religious prejudices of
   Muslims are obviously racists.

An Israeli argument for the E.U. to recognize Palestine

   "More than 700 Israelis, including prominent
   artists and a Nobel laureate, have signed a
   petition appealing to various European parliaments
   to follow Sweden's lead [arguing for the E.U. to
   recognize Palestine].

   In part, the petition reads: 'We the undersigned,
   Citizens of Israel [are under the delusion] that
   the prospects for Israel’s security and existence
   depend on the existence of a Palestinian state side
   by side with Israel. Israel should recognize the
   state of Palestine and Palestine should recognize
   the state of Israel, based on the June 4 1967

Of course, the fact of the matter is that while Israel
may indeed recognize a State of Palestine and live at
peace with those who people it, the Palestinians will
never recognize a State of Israel--And no matter what
lies the Palestinian leaders may feed the world.

What is more likely to occur from an imposition of
such a "Palestinian state" by the World is that the
Palestinians will be encouraged to greater acts of
aggression & hostilities & unconscionable bloodshed
... with resulting greater and bloodier outcomes.

This is what the current leadership of Israel, through
personal experience & painfully acquired knowledge, is
trying desperately to avoid... and over & above the
unimaginable grief given to it by a contemptuous and
uncaring outside World--For in the end it doesn't
really matter to the World what results in the Middle
East, of course: What the world is after is the
galling & notorious Quick Fix. No matter whom it
hurts. Just so some pointless modern day Neville
Chamberlain can wave another meaningless piece of
soiled toilet paper above his head for a miserably
brief moment.

I wonder how long Turkish President Erdogan is going
to get away with blackmailing the United States
trying to push it into a direct confrontation with Assad...
by refusing to help in America's war with ISIS unless
America first establishes a no-fly zone over Syria (ISIS
does not have any planes); especially now that American
military lives are being put on the line. [I suppose as long
as Omana allows it--and that might be a long, long time.

Let us be realistic here: Yes, President Assad is a very naughty boy, but he represents ZERO threat to Western
interests: Zero threat to the West (even including a very
minimal threat to Israel). So for Turkey to demand that
the West tackle Assad BEFORE they will join the fight
against ISIS (which represents incalculable innumerable
REAL threats to the West) is both unreasonable & illogical.

Want to destroy ISIS? Dismantle Turkey and give
the lands the Turks have stolen from the Kurds back
to them. Until the world does that, Islamic Terrorism
will continue unabated across most of the Middle East.

Exactly as they did to the Armenians, at this precise
moment in time the Turks are once again in the process
of orchestrating yet another genocide
(this time that
of the Syrian Kurds). And exactly as the world did
during the Armenian Genocide by the Turks, at this
precise moment in time, instead of trying to stop this
monstrous massacre of the innocents, the world is once
again standing by the side with their arms crossed...
occasionally dropping a bomb on an donkey cart while
disreputably chiding each other for not doing enough!

It is barbaric, it is atrocious, it is shameful, and a
disgrace on all the self-appointed "so-called civilized"
nations of the earth. And, like the Armenian Genocide,
this too shall be long remembered by history to the
everlasting disgrace of every self-damned world leader
now trembling at the knees with fear of actually doing
the least thing about it. So don't think you're going to
get away with saying it's all just Turkey's fault alone:

you have all signed your contemptible names to this
despicable episode with all the black force of history.

S D Rodrian

Rabbi Jill Jacobs writes: You, American taxpayer, are
helping to fund Israeli settlements

I'm also helping to fund Hamas's & Hezbollah's rockets &
other weapons, Islamic butchery everywhere Islam exists,
Egypt's & every other Muslim dictatorship's oppressive wars
of survival against it, the Kurds' war against Turkey AND
Turkey's war against the Kurds, the ancient war of the Shia
against the Sunnis AND the Sunni war against the Shia (of
course), Asia's & Africa's & Latin America's wars on freedom
& democracy, and now do tell me, O Wise Rabbi: Which is
the least of all evils I am funding? [Now allow me to buy a
Jew a bathtub so that he may bathe in peace in Jerusalem.]

Hamas spokesperson: We deported foreign journalists
for filming missile launches

MEMRI report: Hamas claims journalists who filmed
missile launching sites “were collaborating with the

... when they should have been collaborating with
Hamas, of course, (you know:) like all the other
international media 'journalists' in Gaza, of course...

“We managed to reach them," the Hamas spokesperson
went on to say, "and tell them that what they were
doing was anything but professional journalism and
that it was immoral...”

... that it was "immoral & unprofessional" for news
reporters to actually report what they see with their
own eyes ... instead of being "professional Hamas
propagandists." Yes, of course. Most, most naturally.
Now see if the global media actually 'reports' this...


Why does the UN shelter Palestinian civilians in areas from which Hamas is firing?

Where did the twisted idea of letting Qatar mediate a truce in the Middle East ever come from?

Obviously, from some twisted mind. Qatar, of all the miserable places on this planet!? [And, Turkey, with its murderous history of subjugating the Arabs?!] Surely "someone" has a dark sense of humor indeed!


Solution To The Tunnels of Hamas in Gaza?...

The simplest solution is always best, and the simplest
solution to the tunnels of Hamas (which is already
being implemented in part by the Israelis) involves
natural gas [add a dye and, yes, keep the smell].

A powerful gas hose with a large inflatable donut
attached to block off the tunnel shaft is introduced
at any discovered opening. A device for remote
ignition of the gas is left "inside" the body of the
tunnel. And then you start pumping in the mixture.

The instant you see the dye cloud coming out of any
other tunnel entrance(s) you ignite the gas: As anyone
who has seen a house ripped apart by a gas explosion
knows, it's going to be thoroughly effective. And the
process can be repeated as many times as it takes...
The deadliest method might be to pump in just the dye
cloud first, and seal with precision munitions all the
entrances. And then pump in the natural gas or propane
(plus oxygen) until the ideal psi is achieved: I don't
believe any tunnel no matter its length could survive.

Counter-measures by Hamas would be very hard to come
by: Gas-masks are pointless. And a "safe room" would
be nothing more than a burial alive for terrorists
foolish enough to believe they could survive in them
and come out later to attack the engineers working to
destroy the tunnels. Experimentation might be required
to find out exactly what psi gas volume is required to
collapse these shafts, and whether additional oxygen
might be needed. But the greatest difficulty will be
simply discovering the hidden tunnels themselves.

This entire process should be well-publicized by the
Israelis well ahead of time so that the terrorists
understand that they must immediately vacate all the
tunnels: Kerry, Ki-moon, and the other Hamas enablers,
drama queens & hypocrites out there would be awfully
upset if any terrorists are harmed, of course. So, you
know: God forbid.


   Europe's order to mute Google angers US

This is an insane ruling: If I wish to find out "who
you are," and the information I am given is "who you
would like me to think you are" then Google has
ceased to be a search engine (for me to carry out my
research) and become merely a free outlet for "your"
lies & ads! What's the use of Google then?!?


Robinson: Israel is losing the moral high ground

Which happens in every one of these wars: Hamas fires at Israel from behind Palestinian civilians. To save its own civilians Israel's only option is to fire back, piling up the corpses until the "righteous" world declares Hamas's pile of corpses "the moral high ground," and we all descend back down into pointless "moral equivalence."

Really creeps me out to be a member of the same species.

Anything less than the complete destruction of Hamas will always be a defeat for Israel... and guarantee the next round in this preventable disease' "flat line" of bumps.


Conversations Floating In The Summer Breeze:

[... Israeli Defense Minister Moshe Yaalon said the
operation was going according to plan, with Israel
targeting various Hamas interests: "The military's
successes so far have been very significant," he said.
"We will continue until they understand that this
escalation is not beneficial to them and that we will
not tolerate rocket fire toward our towns and
citizens." ] NEWS REPORT

I am astonished by Israel's self-restraint in the face
of this no-holds-barred war against it! I think were I
the Prime Minister of Israel I'd send a few neutron
bombs all around the lands of Israel and kill every God-
damned Arab as far as Superman can throw a rock.

          "That would be genocide!"

You know that?!? Then how come you don' know
that what the Arabs have wanted & worked on
relentlessly since 1948 for the Jews of Israel is
itself also genocide? I smell the odious stink here
of that new-minted "partisanship" which also goes
by the ancient name of "anti-Semitism."

[As Israel pressed forward, the U.N. Security Council
met in New York to discuss the situation. Addressing
the meeting, U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon
condemned the rocket fire out of Gaza, while also
calling Israel's offensive "intolerable."] NEWS REPORT

  TRANSLATION: It is intolerable to the U.N. that
  Israel should attack those who have attacked Israel
  (according to th'Great & Noble U.N. Jews should accept
  being shot at or butchered by Hamas and do no more
  than bury their dead and ... maybe complain a little).

Hamas' main (perhaps only) effective weapon seems
to be the world's usual/habitual/routine/expected and
sad condemnation apparently of Israel's increasingly
effective capability for defending itself from Hamas'
murderous attempts to indiscriminately kill Jews.

Kids, enjoy it, because that's the world you live in.

The world not only expects the Israelis to shoot the
guns out of the hands of the Palestinians who come
shooting at them, but also condemns the Israelis when
the Palestinians hurt their hands or fingers if the
Israelis ARE successful and DO shot the guns from the
Palestinians' hands! This is anti-Semitism at its most
brutal, dude.

The only way to ensure peace in the Arab-Israeli
Conflict once & for all is to reduce the Arab military
capabilities down to Zero
. No other means are
possible. All other means are nonsense, utterly and
hopelessly pointless. No other means will ensure it.

You can have a gun to the head of the Arab and he will
open the Koran and read there that, "when your enemy
hath a gun at your head, sign a false peace agreement
with him--then, as soon as he takes the gun away from
your head & starts to walk away... stab him in the
back!" Therefore, by that means & by that means alone
will the Muslim sign a peace agreement with you.

Sure, the Israelis want peace. And they will always be
willing to sign a peace agreement with the Arabs &
live up to it forever and ever, but--What the Hell
kind of a peace agreement can you sign with somebody
who is convinced GOD commands him to murder you?!?!

      Forgetaboutit, my friend.

You want assurances from a Muslim that the "peace
agreement" he signs with you is genuine, heartfelt,
honest & sincere, and that he really, really intends
to honor it? Tell him to spit (on the Koran) on it: He
won't spit on the Koran--he has no intention honoring
that agreement. So use it as the toilet paper it is.


The Gazans complain to the media about being bombed
--what can the media do outside of more incitement?
Why don't the Gazans simply ask Hamas to stop firing
missiles at Israel: If Hamas doesn't fire missiles at
Israel then Israel will not fire back. And the dying
will instantly stop. It's a very simple solution,
really. So I wonder why the Gazans don't just get up
and do that instead of all the dramatics they're doing
for the sake of the international media. [sarcasm]

Have I no pity for the Gazans? Who can pity a people
who revel in their unquenchable bloodthirst, whose
desire for murder and butchery of their fellow human
beings is such that they are even willing & eager to
see their own children massacred as long as they may
be able to murder their neighbor's. These people, if
you can even call them that, have no mercy from God.

Watching the current Hamas attack on Israel I can't
help but be astonished at just how lucky the damned
Gazans are
--Can you imagine what they would be
experiencing now if Hamas were lobbing missiles at a
Muslim country!? Ask the Iraqi Kurds to tell you of
their experiences with Saddam Hussein. Read about
the Sunni-Shia strife. Or, take an aerial view of
Syria (the destruction there was not caused because
they were aiming at structures but because the
structures got in the way of their aiming at people).

The poor Israelis keep saying they want to impress on
Hamas the damage they're causing them! O Lord, protect
these innocents! I say to the Israelis: Look at what
the Libyans did to Muammar Gaddafi--Do that to the
Hamas militants and maybe then it's possible they
might be impressed. That's the kind of enemy you're
fighting. Good luck! May God protect you & your children.

Too easily we forget that the veneer of civilization
is but a self-deception, a trick we play on ourselves!
Not unlike the Nazi death camp SS guards who, after a
long day of the most unimaginably brutal degradations,
torture, and murder of their fellow human beings...
would come home to their loving families to pretend
they were kind, warm, gentle loving souls. That's who
we really are, you know: quite unimaginable savages
who like to pretend we are "human" but by the sheer
magic of calling ourselves that.

Perhaps if more people understood this truth there
would be less war, fewer temptations for us to revert
back to that most primitive animal nature which still
constitutes the most of us.

I myself never cease to marvel at how the Israelis
have managed to hold on to that thin, thin dream for
such a long time in the face of so much temptation
being pushed upon them by the Palestinian hordes

It didn't take that long for the Brits and Americans
to visit upon the Germans & Japanese exactly the same
barbarities they were pushing upon the Allies, carpet-
bombing the German & Japanese civilians without pity
or remorse.

But it cannot go on forever, I fear. Sooner or later,
the Israelis too will tire of hanging on to their own
imagined civilized nature and revert back to the true
beast within us: We are all, all of us, the same
animals. Then, too late, too late the Arabs will truly
be sorry for all of the chances they have missed to
match the Jews' present display of humanity, of

If the Palestinians were being killed by Syrians (or
anybody other than Israeli Jews) the world wouldn't
give a damn. I'm certain of it. In fact they'd cheer:
"Good! Kill'em! They're cockroaches." The only reason
we see the world's hearts bleeding so for the handful
of Palestinians Hamas has managed to murder by
sticking'em in harm's way is without a doubt because
they were felled by Jewish bullets
. Iran and Iraq
managed to butcher over a million souls between them
and I never heard a word about the true immensity of
their crime until historians coldly summed it all up
long after it was all over & done with... I remember
once in a while reading mentions of it (by the same
Western media which now sticks every wounded
Palestinian in our faces as one more "innocent" victim
of the Jews)... as if they were describing something
happening in some distant planet, some interesting
pointless conflict between alien species of insects.

Then, the zonked-out moralists of the world insist
that Israel's restraint (due to its civilized nature)
is victory enough over the Palestinians' genocidal
bloodlust. But the real difference comes down to
Israel's successful reliance on its scientific and
technological superiority... to stay their hand (an
advantage, by the way, which although the Palestinians
might not presently be able to match, they may yet
acquire, by theft, subterfuge, or by simply being
given it by others at some future date). And this
means that at some point perhaps in the not so distant
future wiser Israelis may see the unavoidable need to
eliminate their enemies once & for all before their
enemies eliminate them once & for all. It is
unquestionably the end result all this is headed for,
sooner or later, for I do not see who or what can
possibly derail this doom.


The Gaza Palestinians are in love with war. It is a
lust beyond all known perversions: They display the
corpses of their babies to the world in hypocritical
"shows" of heartbreaking grief when in reality they
themselves not only chose to offer them as their
sacrifice in the bloody altar of Hamas's bloodlust
(for the sake of the possible murder of any Jew) but,
when asked, again & again they assert their continued
almost sexual passion for the annihilation they have
wrapped themselves in
. They all revel in butchery and
mayhem, in death & destruction, without the slightest
care how many of their children are killed or maimed.
In fact they long & work for piling up their corpses
as a monument to the most evil insanity you'd ever
want to witness! Even their Muslim brothers are
appalled at their callous heartless and cold-blooded
hypocrisy for the Western cameras. They out-do all the
most depraved Devil-worshipping of fact or legend.
"The gory scenes of Palestinian casualties highlighted
by the global media should have been presented in
the context of Hamas responsibility for deliberately
orchestrating this nightmare." [Isi Leibler]
Hey, Gazans, show you dead babies to Hamas--they're
the only ones who can really do anything about their
getting killed (the Western Press can only promote the
sickest form of voyeurism for the mere sake of ratings


UN launches inquiry into possible Israeli human rights violations in Gaza

Hey, UN, investigate thyself first:

Ban Ki-moon expresses 'outrage' as rockets found in Gaza school go missing

If UNRWA handed rockets over to Hamas, is that a war crime?


The 2-states solution will not work until after
the Palestinians are willing not only to support
the Jewish State but also are willing to defend it
themselves if need be.


Putin Vows To Strengthen Russia's Capabilities To Counter NATO

France Moves to Defy Allies on Sale of Warship to Russia

Principles may be principles, alliances may be alliances, but "Le Cash is Le Cash!"

Britain: O, for shame, thou France! 'ere, the proper term's "The lolly be the lolly."

Despite Sanctions Call, UK OKs Russia Arms Exports

America: "You bet yo ass, baby!"

Russia to continue to supply rocket engines to US despite sanctions

No wonder Putin's hordes are getting ready to march into Ukraine.


From Turkey to North Africa the West has chosen to
ally itself with the most un-democratic Islamists they
could find, instead of trying to support the few
secular enlightened Muslims available, and now we
are all paying for this folly. Will the Great Wise Men
of the West learn their lesson from this and now take
the right path? O sure, as their collective motto is:
"If a policy proves to be wrong, simply double down on
it again & again & again--That's how wrong policies
succeed!" And now you too know how & why today's
diplomats have bankrupted the whole world.


      The Birth of The New Dark Ages.

Once the West was as intolerant of Islam as Muslims
are of Christianity in every Islamic nation even now.

But today the West is becoming more & more tolerant
of Muslims in their midst, welcoming them by the
millions ... without giving the slightest thought to
the fact that those Muslims in their midst remain as
intolerant (of any & all non-Muslim religions) as
they ever were back home.

The result is inevitable: At some point European
Muslims will demand (and by their sheer numbers) force
the West to become more & more intolerant
... until the
West itself will become even more intolerant than ever
it was in all its history.

It won't happen all at once, of course. But it will
happen eventually: And so the very fact that the West
is becoming more religiously tolerant is the very
thing which will eventually turn it as religiously
intolerant as the rest of the Islamic nations are now.


           The truth can never be
           sacrilegious: The truth IS God.

                         -- S D Rodrian


Was Iraq's collapse into civil war really so hard to see?


Yes, George Bush was stupid as shit & ignorant
as all-get-out, but he was on the side of the angels compared to Obama


The only way Obama would strike Iran would be
hogtied & hoisted up on an erection of the GOP.


Yes, George Bush was stupid as shit & ignorant
as all-get-out, but he was on the side of the angels compared to Obama


Thus speaketh The Presbyterian Church: We may not
be qualified to say anything about Muslims & Arabs
butchering and murdering as they please--old men,
women & children--but we definitely condemn Israel
for setting up roadblocks to prevent Palestinians from
butchering/murdering Jews--old men, women & children!


Personally, I'm glad that Desmond Tutu seems to
believe that the United States and Israel are the only
countries in the world that have so many things for
which they should apologize (unlike ... Russia, China,
North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela ... Syria, Iran, and the
other hundred-plus dismal dictatorships which curse
this earth). I'm glad because I happen live in these
United States, and if this country is one of the worst
countries on earth... then life on earth (outside these
United States) must truly be Paradise then, and all
those "better" nations out there must now enjoy the
blessings of a life of unimaginable ease & leisure...
freedom & abundance & prosperity, of true democracy
& self-determination, wisdom, education, kindness,
gentleness, benevolence, health, wealth, good-
neighborliness & the brotherhood of man! Thank you
for the good word, O Desmond Tutu! Thanks b2u!

Ariel Sharon & The Gaza Withdrawal

Originally I was of the opinion that Israel's Gaza
withdrawal would prove to be a mistake. However, over
time I have come to see it as a kind of necessary
practical warning for what would happen were Israel to
withdraw from the West Bank.

I don't know whether Ariel Sharon viewed it this way
too, or whether he just made a policy mistake
(confusing political maneuverings with military
strategy): Israel's withdrawal from Gaza was a sound
military maneuver, but not such a sound political one
... as not every sound achievement in one field
translates that perfectly into the other one. [And
Ariel Sharon could be as flawed a political architect
as he was an undisputedly great military strategist.]

Nowadays ... I believe that eventually (since people
are essentially monkeys, and take aeons to see even
what's right in front of their eyes), I believe people
will eventually look at what the result of Israel's
withdrawal from Gaza has proven to be, and understand
from this vividly practical lesson what the result of
Israel's withdrawal from the West Bank (or, in the
common parlance: "the two-state solution") would be
not only for Israelis, but for the Palestinians (who
would unquestionably then go from a simple constrain
in their "movements" (in order to prevent them
murdering Israeli civilians) into a murderous if not
perpetual state of hot war).


Why I Am A Zionist.

Zionism is nothing more & nothing less than the
Jewish People's aspirations for self-determination.
[As such, every human being of good conscience
on this earth, Jewish or not, must support AND
encourage Zionism.] And since history has proven
beyond a doubt that nowhere on earth can that
self-determination be expressed but in Israel, the
Jewish People's singular patrimony... any denial
of the Jews' right to the land of Israel IS a de facto
denial of their manifest right to self-determination.

S D Rodrian

The Jews have no choice--I know there are many
who quip that Jews can go to the U.S. or some
other country, but time & time again history has
proven these to be suicidal suggestions for Jews:

God bless the Jewish People! Tried & true, let
them, in their own land of milk & honey (by the
good Grace of God & their own efforts) thrive
in peace and security, success, prosperity &
happiness, down the ages and ages of Man.

No. I am not a Jew. But I do share something
with the Jews: We are all human beings: One
certainty which some Muslims & a few others
now monstrously deny--to their own shameful
everlasting disgrace, discredit, and dishonor.

As a Zionist, someone who at least advocates Israel
as The State of The Jewish People, I cannot see how
that project can be moved forward by incorporating
the substantial Muslim population of Judea/Samaria.
On the contrary, such a move would undoubtedly,
inevitably produce a miserably failed state
, ripped
apart by its own self-divided citizens (if Palestinians
are granted real citizenship... otherwise the result
can only be a miserable apartheid state--failure).

For this reason, the solution which seems the best
possible one to me is any which dances around the
present status quo: Whether it dances slighting one
way or slightly the other, the status quo's greatest
price now & for the foreseeable future is the ongoing
pernicious attacks by an outside world which keeps
shouting at Israel to let go of the poor tiger's tail.
[I think Israel can live with that painfully obvious
lack of concern by the world about Jewish safety.]

In some ideal future final resolution, either Israel's
military superiority will so exponentially surpass
that of her neighbors that it will become moot just
who sets up states/nations about her. Perhaps a truly
impenetrable barrier will finally be developed. Or
perhaps, in not so ideal a solution, the Palestinians
will finally acquire WMDs and force Israel to at last
kill the tiger once & for all. If that ever comes about:
the world, of course, will no doubt blame Israel for
not letting itself be slaughtered by the tiger ... but,
that's always been the way of the world, hasn't it!
Ya can't live by other people's opinions: They'll kill'ya!



Sorry, guys, but I am of the opinion that people, not
borders, make a nation
. So, for me, self-determination
trumps borders every time: If the Russian-speaking
peoples living within countries other than Russia want
to join with the rest of the Russians... it should be
their unquestioned "human' right to do so--borders be
damned. If the Tibetans do not wish to be part of
China then they should be free to establish their own
Tibetan nation. So to with the Kurds, who are captives
now of all their non-Kurdish neighbors. So too with
the Palestinians, and so too with the Jews, and so too
with the post-Reconquista Spanish & every European
nation which is now being torn apart by the influx of
strangers who want nothing whatever to do with the
peoples of the European nations they are flooding ...
and so too with all the nationalities now held against
their will inside... Russia, China, Pakistan, India, in
Africa & elsewhere in the world: A nation is a people
(be they millions or a handful) all of whom identify
with one another, and therefore all of whom devote
their every undivided effort to safeguard, preserve,
promote, and strengthen the nation's shared way of
life. Or what's a Monaco for then!

I but hope that this can all come about by reason,
law, and the good will of men with the wisdom &
understanding to see that this is the ONLY WAY.

I believe in self-determination: If the "Russian" part
of Ukraine wants to join Russia it would be immoral
for anybody else to have a veto over their wishes.
What is truly moronic of Putin is the way he's going
about trying to expedite this: What he is doing with
all his idiotic military threats and his injection of
violent armed thugs & subversives into Ukraine is
not just scaring the Ukrainians, but also scaring NATO
and Europe, and the United States, and the rest of
the world... and that is not only unnecessary but
downright self-defeating for the country of Russia.
Mr. Putin has succeeded like no one else before him
at instilling in the Europeans the need for military
and political unity
. And given the United States more
standing and relevance in European eyes than anyone
before him ever has in the so-called post-Cold War era.

          Putin sez:
"Who're you're gonna believe, your eyes or me!"

I've been reading all the muckety-muck being poured
out by so-called experts & other interested parties
about what's going on in Ukraine, and since no one
seems to be dealing with the real cause of it I will
point it out here and now: Very little of it has
anything to do with the "geopolitical" or "ethnic" or
any other of the adult reasons that've been bandied
about (mostly by the Russians) primarily as a
smoke-screen which the Western "wise men" (like the
idiots they are) are then blindly trying to brush and
broom down--The problem is identical to what the world
faced with Napoleon, Hitler, & others like them: Putin
is a little squirt who has probably been looked down
on all his little life... and so he has probably spent all
his time trying to be "bigger" than everybody else,
being better than everybody else at everything, being
more vicious than everybody else, more powerful than
everybody else, more patriotic, braver than everybody
else... that's why you see him embarrassingly showing
off his blubbery old breasts out in the boondocks,
pretending he's the world's manliest man. It's an old
story that any guy who has ever witnessed a bar brawl
knows all too well: It's NEVER the big slob who starts
them but always the little squirt. And, guys...

Obviously, Putin has made a safe bet that he can
crash Ukraine before Obama's term is over and the
next president can rescue Ukraine from him.

If you don't slap this little squirt down NOW you're
going to have to fight the big war he's Hell-bent on
bringing to the world later, exactly like Hitler,
exactly like Napoleon: Putin cannot help himself, it's
a psychological drive he cannot control--if he could
we would have seen signs of it all along his career
& there just aren't many. What you see instead is a
sorry history of mousy risk-taking followed by bigger
and bigger risk-taking. Putin the little punk is the
classic kiss-up/kick-down little dog in the pack. And
he can't stop himself (something which, like
Napoleon's and Hitler's inner circles, Putin's inner
circle must be very familiar with by now). Now it
remains for the rest of the world to recognize this
character flaw & to act on it before it is too late.

S D Rodrian

   The pro-Russians bristled at any suggestion that
   their seizure of government buildings was wrong.
   "Pro-Western protesters in Kiev have held
   government buildings and the city’s main square
   since last fall," they said. “Why did America
   support those acts, but is in opposition to ours?”
   said Maksim, the young former paratrooper who
   organized Yuri’s snipers by the bridge. “These are
   the contradictions of the West.”

No they are not, comrade: Had the German people
occupied Hitler's buildings you would have favored
that, but no doubt would have opposed Soviet peoples
occupying Stalin's buidings--Yet it's the same action:
taking buildings. So it's not about taking buildings,
but about whose buildings one takes:

The Ukrainians are fighting for democracy, for
extending political power to the greatest number of
people. The pro-Russians are fighting to hand over
their part of Ukraine, themselves, and their children
over to dictatorship, to the profligate Russian Mafia
headed by Csar Putin.

Now, maybe they think the Russian Mafia will make them
all rich capos & dons, and maybe they're just idiots.
Either way, the pro-Russians are fighting to hand
their part of Ukraine, themseves, and their chidren
over to the chains of dictatorship for the sake of the
dictators. And that's a sad thing indeed to be doing.

Chinese fighter jets 'patrol' over disputed island chain

There's an old saying: "Sow and ye shall reap." What
China is doing now, Mister Obama, is taking advantage
of the fact that you've proven to everybody that you
ain't got no balls--And, can you really blame China?
Opportunities like finding an American President they
can order to bend over AND HE WILL don't come by
that often.

Obama's response? To send Joe Biden to China just
so he could come back with a pained yellow ass

Well, Mr. President, because you chose not to bomb
Syria and you chose not to bomb Iran now you're
gonna have to bomb China [or crawl away like a beaten
. And that's going to be the most dangerous
proposition of all. Go now & spank all the idiots who
gave you all that noble bad advice (about how the
United States of American should always take the high
road of diplomacy over military actions) and tell them that they're all stupid morons, Mister President...
unless you're your own worst adviser, of course.

S D Rodrian

  Next up in Obama's roll-call of allies stabbed in
  the back by his hysterical running away from
  confrontation with America's enemies
: Japan,
  South Korea, The Phillipines, Taiwan...

      and now the Ukraine. Well,

The Solution To The Ukranian Take-Over by Russia
Is To Push Back Intelligently.

Dear President Obama: Putin knows you're a wuss. The
Chinese know you're a wuss. The Iranians know you're
a wuss. Who doesn't know you're a wuss? The Syrians,
the Venezuelans know you're a wuss. The French know
you're a wuss, for Heaven's sake. Even the Republicans
know you're a wuss--Stop kidding yourself... look in the
mirror and admit: "You're a wuss all right, all right!"

Were you not a wuss you're immediately see that
the solution to the Ukrainian Dilemma is (not to go
to war with Russia, but) to assert, protect and defend
U.S. interests where they are threatened by Russian
take-overs: Egypt and Iran are just two of them. Get
over your lily-livered high-mindedness and restore
America's old alliance with the Egyptian military. And
then bomb Iran's nuclear facilities: That, and nothing
less than that will instruct Putin (not to mention the
Chinese) on the real "costs" of military intervention.

The fault, my dear Brutus, lies not in Obama but in
: What did we really expect was going to
happen when we elected a college professor to be the
head of the military that keeps us safe from all the
abysmal criminals that people the nations about us?!?
Didn't we realize his first instinct was to believe
that he could lecture them into decency & reason?


"The Ukrainian rebels have suggested that Russia
should send peacekeepers, but Moscow says that
could only be done with UN authorization.

Personally, I don't see what the problem is. I mean, it's
not as if Russia couldn't just send in its "peacekeepers"
and claim the UN had authorized them: How is anyone
going to tell those lies from all the other Russian lies?!?

For a long time now The Wise Old Men of the West
have been telling us that America had to remain
engaged in the world because it was the only power
able to ensure the World's stability and peace. Now,
for the first time ever we have an American president
who believes (and acts on his beliefs) that it is not
America's responsibility to maintain the world
stability & peace but the world's. And thereby we
shall all have a front-row seat to the life-and-death
drama of whether this wise old truism was true or not.

Either peace & stability will break out spontaneously
all over the world, now that America's gone into
hiding, or we shall have a few nuclear wars here &
there. No doubt it shall all be a matter of great
dramatic interest to a lot of people: Was it cheaper
to keep holding on to the tail of the tiger, or to
finally let go? We'll all have the great pleasure of
seeing for ourselves, won't we


         What should Netanyahu do?

How in the world could he possibly have trusted the
lives of the Israeli Jews to the hands of people who
have time & time & time again used those hands of
theirs to strange & butcher Jews?!? How many times
must a man be given the same painful practical lesson
before it cracks through his thick skull? I'm not a Jew
myself and even I know what a whopping moron it'd
take for any Jew to go along with this insanity.

   Anyone who trusts his life to others is a fool.
   Anyone who trusts the lives of his family to
   others is a mental deficient. And anyone who
   trusts the lives of his family and those of his
   entire people to others should be imprisoned
   on the spot
--And one should not have to wait
   out the sad inevitable tragedy's final act.

What he should have done long, long ago is: Publicly
acknowledge that the disputes between Iran and the
U.S. & Europe are all merely economic ones (which
might be resolved by diplomacy)... while the conflict
between Iran and Israel is strictly one of survival
(and might only be possible to resolve when one side
or the other wins the war inevitable).

Netanyahu should state categorically right now that
he recognizes that if Iran closes the Strait of Hormuz
the U.S. & Europe might be able to develop alternate
commercial routes. But that if Iran destroys Israel,
then that's all she rode for Israel, and all the Jews
of Israel will be dead, dead, dead.

Therefore any negotiations between Iran and the U.S.
& Europe really bear NO import whatsoever upon the
conflict between Iran and Israel
, period. These are
two separate and distinct entities as separate and
distinct as a human cell is from a pot brush.

Let the Americans & Europeans negotiate their Iranian
commerce permissions in the Middle East with Iran.
And Israel will negotiate its existential rights with
the Iranians themselves.

The very idea that those with the one set of interests
can also negotiate the so separate & distinct
interests of the other group is both a burden for the
Americans & Europeans, and downright suicidal for the

If Netanyahu does not understand this, & does not act
as he ought to, he shall go down in history as Israel's
biggest fool & criminal of all time.

S D Rodrian


Justifying Judeocide by Martin Sherman

These release of murderers of Jews by the Jewish
state are in fact a categorical statement that "We
Jews were wrong," that "we Jews acknowledge that
these murderers were indeed justified in killing
Jews." [That is what happens when any wrongly-
convicted person is freed by a court of law, after
all: it is an acknowledgement that the conviction
was wrong to begin with.] In my opinion, it had
been much better for the Jewish state to pay billions
in humiliating tribute. In fact, it would have been
better for the Jewish state to surrender portions of
itself, pounds & pounds of flesh as it were, and
suffered the agonizing loss of blood.

Even though Israeli leaders see it as a sacrifice
that they must offer Western leaders
to get the
Palestinians to engage in a "peace process" Israel
considers, in the words of Benjamin Netanyahu:
"a vital strategic interest for Israel" ...

Every time Israel releases Palestinian terrorists
and convicted murderers she sends out and
reinforces the false impression that these are
not criminals justly convicted and justly serving
their legal sentences but merely political hostages.
And this does nothing but reinforce the world's
self-righteous insistence that Israel, just like
"any other Mafia family," must release all the
political prisoners she is "so unfairly" holding
hostage. This is self-delegitimization at its worst.

S D Rodrian

Sarah Honig writes: "By downplaying multiple
murder convictions, Amos Oz invalidates verdicts, delegitimizes our courts and damages Israel’s legal
reputation beyond repair
." And I might add: So does
PM Netanyahu when he frees Palestinian murderers
(validating & legitimizing Oz and creeps like him).

Everywhere Muslims are butchering uncounted
tens of thousands, enslaving millions, stealing
every penny the West donates and giving it to
terrorists and their families, denying democracy
& human rights to their peoples, engaging in
wholesale genocide and war, persecuting and
ethnic cleansing Christian and all minorities they
can... and the self-righteous morons of the West
are outraged only over how many bathrooms Jews
are installing in their own homes! If that doesn't
tell you just how insane Western Civilization has
become nothing will.

S D Rodrian

Better that the whole world condemn Israel for all its
settlements outside the green line and demand it
abandons them than that it condemn it for Haifa &
Jerusalem and demands that it abandons them too.

I am truly quite baffled just why it is that the West
(especially the U.S.) is so eager to reach a deal [ANY
DEAL] with Iran
. Unless this is all a sham (a costume
drama by whoppingly hypocritical actors who already
know all these "negotiations" are doomed to fail and
are going through the motions just to make Obama &
company look like Jesus Christ on earth or something):
There has to be a factor in all this which is not
readily apparent. But what the Hell that could be is,
frankly, beyond me.

It just might be that the West has resigned itself to
a nuclear Iran
and they are desperately trying to set
up a "de facto détente" with Iran... to achieve a
system somewhat similar to the one which existed
between the West & the Soviet Union. But, if this is
the case, the West is setting itself up to hoist
itself on its own stupid nuclear war
, because Iran is
nothing like the old Soviet Union [which was run by
the infinitely corrupt anything-for-a-buck Communist
Mafia] and a heck of a lot more like "the David Korash
confrontation in Waco, Texas." And, you are NOT going
to negotiate someone who is convinced he is The
Messenger of God down to a "company executive-type."
And no matter what the pay-package you put together.


Why not make a simple proposal: The Arabs need only
recognize Israel as a Jewish state as long as they
claim themselves to be Muslim states. That certainly
seems fair, and should settle the matter once & for all.


Who'd've thunk it: France is now the only Western
Power worth a penny in the Middle East!

To be expected, really: The only thing tough about
John Kerry is his horse's face. The political history
of Kerry is that he'd oppose an American soldier
tossing one of his wife's can of tomatoes at al-Qaida
in anger. And this is the West's principal negotiator
of war & peace?!? Pipa, something is wrong in the
world. What the West needs is a much tougher
negotiator, somebody like Neville Chamberlain...

After tough-looking pushover Kerry fell on his
Frankenstein-like face trying to give Iran everything it
could have possibly wanted & then some
, it was the
French (yes!) who objected to the Iranians having their
hands all up in the West's "nalgas" ("buttcheeks").

"The Americans haven't spoken to the Iranians since
1979. And the Americans are telling us how it should
be done
," French analyst Heisbourg said. As for the
Americans, "maybe they just want a deal — it happens
all the time in history: People badly want a deal, and
end up by negotiating against themselves."

“The Iranians are the ones who came crawling to the
negotiations, begging for an easing of sanctions,
otherwise their regime will fall, and what’s
incredible is that it seems that the Americans are
more eager than them to reach an agreement,” an
Israeli official charged.

"We are not blind, and I don't think we're stupid,"
rebutted Kerry. [sic.] Well, at least Kerry can SEE
he's not blind: That's half the fight right there!
Maybe somebody should tell him (that it is only
when el estupido is finally convinced he's stupid
that he stops being one): Don't fight it, Kerry!
Don't fight it! It's for your own good, man.


Obama: Military strike could lead Iran to 'pursue nukes
more vigorously'

How in Hell can they "pursue it more vigorously?!?!!"
They're doing everything within their power to get it

Obama & Kerry are either treasonable or the greatest
cretins in the history of American diplomacy
. Period.

  One thing is certain: A man who states that a
  "military strike could lead Iran to pursue nukes
  more vigorously" is the world's greatest advocate
  AGAINST the military option. And it is the biggest
  idiot on earth who doesn't get this: I'm sure the
  Iranians "got it" a long time ago.

S D Rodrian


The Iranians announced that they're going to engage
in an intensified diplomatic push over the "next few
months" because, well, I suspect, because those "next
few months" are all Iran needs
to complete its race to
create a bomb & then declare itself a nuclear power.
And, of course, Iran has concluded that no one will
dare attack it while it is so "honorably" engaged in
such a noble peace-seeking diplomatic enterprise

The proof of this is that the Iranians are not [now]
allowing the outside world to go in and see for itself
exactly what it is it will be bargaining for. (In the
common parlance this is called "trying to sell a pig
in a poke.')

If Israel (and forget about anyone else doing this),
if Israel does not strike Iran's nukes... people will
one day talk about not only "the six million" but
about "the eight million" too:

Dear Mr. Netanyahu, please stop playing the part of
Obama's idiot boy! Hit Iran before they get the bomb!
You need to hit Iran NOT while they're putting the
finishing touches on their bomb but before their
facilities are anywhere nearing completion: Bite the
bullet, and Save The Jews of Israel... because no one
on this earth but you can or will do this.

Assured mutual destruction will not work against
people who believe that dying while murdering others
in the name of their gods is the surest way to go to
their Paradise. [Read the Koran... and shudder.] In
the common parlance: Does the Pope believe in God?

The British message on Syria to Obama: "Sorry,
Mister President, but we can't seem to locate Winston
Churchill's balls--We know they're here somewhere.
And we assure you that we are looking for them.
We'll ring you right up... minute they turn up. Sorry."

Obama's message to the world: "We going, baby!
We going... just as soon as Congress lends me the
use of Jimmy Carter's balls."

Congress's message to Obama: "We'll let you go,
Mister President. However, you must understand that
first we have to collect BOTH George W. Bush's balls
AND Bill Clinton's balls--Now, we pretty much know
where Bush's balls are, but Bill Clinton's balls could
be just anywhere, really: We'll get back to ya."

And this, mind you, is taking into consideration that
Obama's likely plan is to put pitcher Roy Halladay on
one of those "attack" ships and have him throw a rock
at Syria in the hope he hits Assad on the head! Now,
Roy is a great pitcher, but--

When Adolph Hitler (who was NEVER intent on starting
World War II) was warned about the consequences of
his actions... his reply was: “I saw them at Munich.”
[the leaders of the Western democracies] “They are
like worms.” And just like Adolph Hitler: Putin, the
Chinese leadership, the Iranian theocrats... none of
them would ever dream of starting WWIII. But they
could certainly all be encouraged to do it... and by
a mere handful of worms.

Still, NO: I would NOT hit Syria. I would strike
Iran: Striking Syria is like trying to cut off a
city's entire water supply by shutting down one
of its house's spigots. On the other hand: Hit Iran
and you solve the most menacing threat now
facing the world
. Plus: you put the fear of God
on the Syrians (and on that third leg of the still
standing Axis of Evil: the Russians... who like the
rest of the world, myself included, do not believe
there is a chance in Hell Obama will strike Iran
even if Iran shuts down the entire world's economy
under nuclear blackmail once they get the bomb
--I mean, least of all then).

S D Rodrian


Christians have been taught since the beginnings
of Christianity that "by good deeds one can go to
Heaven." Well, since its inception Islam has been
teaching Muslims that "by murder they can go to
Paradise." It's a very sharp contrast: Christianity
wins and keeps adherents by impressive acts of
sacrifice for others, and Islam by impressive acts
of sacrificing others for oneself. And I don't believe
that selfishness is ever anything other than pure
evil. I also believe that Good shall triumph over Evil
--But, for it to do so, we must start by pointing out
what people are up to (evil or good). And by doing
this in spite of the fact that we know that people who
do evil in the world are always offended by having it
pointed out.

S D Rodrian


I disagree with Pope Francis that the chemical
butchery by Assad of his own people is not enough
of a concern of ours to warrant our risking doing
something more than just talking about it: It's not
as if these poor creatures were orangutans, maybe
(close relatives of ours but, as Pope Francis seems
to understand this, certainly NOT human beings whose
humanity alone DEMANDS that we inject ourselves into
the situation to rescue them... even at our peril).

It's not as if anybody really believes in the so-
called “responsibility to protect” (known in
international-relations circles as R2P)... a straight-
forward, if often misunderstood, notion: Nations must
protect their citizens from genocide, war crimes,
crimes against humanity and ethnic cleansing, and must
take action to help other nations whose governments
can’t or won’t protect their peoples." Certainly Pope
Francis does not: he seems to think diplomacy will be
enough--as if diplomacy somehow had never been used
since it was first invented on earth (probably by
aggressors who preferred their victims using diplomacy
to their also using force to protect themselves).

     It has never happened & it never will:

Diplomatic efforts are all mostly a sham, a kind of
shameful self-deception we perpetrate on ourselves to
try to convince ourselves that there are reasonable
"men of peace" among us. But few if any diplomatic
efforts have ever dissuaded those who were truly bent
on violence & murder--And if you disagree then get rid
of your police force & send in the diplomats instead
to try to persuade your criminals that a negotiated
settlement between you & them is the best course of
action [maybe you could give them half of what they
intended to steal, or one of your two daughters for
them to rape, or maybe you could let them murder only
half the number of victims they originally intended
to]. After all, a good compromise is better than using
violence to oppose them, right! (as Pope Francis seems
to believe).

But I suppose it's all right for Pope Francis to
practice that ancient self-deception & to cry out to
people trapped inside the burning building to, "Hang
on! We're praying for you!" Frankly, I'm convinced
those people would rather have firemen risking their
lives trying to rescue them than diplomats seeking to
negotiate "a just & honorable" settlement with flames
everybody, including even Pope Francis, knows will
never negotiate in good faith. But that's just me.

Just as there are few criminals who have ever been
dissuaded by reasonable arguments from carrying out
crimes on which they were really & truly intent: it
will be hard to find many cases in the annals of
history where diplomacy dissuaded aggressors who
were not just simply bluffing: The only principle that
has ever dissuaded such aggressors has been the
more persuadable strength of their intended victims.

Should we/would we abandon diplomacy? No. It would
be too much to expect that we would ever acknowledge
that we are imperfect human beings still, just merely
only grasping at that goal... far, far away from it.

I am and always have been opposed to Western
in the insane conflicts between Muslims.
However, this does not mean that I am opposed to
Western Powers acting to help the innocent victims of
those Muslim conflicts--and even if those victims
themselves yet hate us or even promote our murder
(as many of those Muslims do & will even after we risk
our lives to save & protect them)... because when we
abandon our fellow human beings to the most horrible
of fates it is to our own humanity that we are turning
our backs, and no matter how good a reason we may
have for such inhumanity.

Just like those Israeli medics treating Syrian rebels
coming to them... without regard to the fact that
those very same men are very likely to be their worst
enemies if ever they do topple Assad... human beings
(not sometimes, but) always must act to protect their
fellow human beings even at he risk of their own lives
--as that may be the thing which above all others
makes us (or may yet make us) human.

S D Rodrian


Syrian Opposition Forces Feel Let Down by Obama

Obama's Congressional lobbyists: "We gotta hit Syria!
Our national prestigue, the honor of our country, the
very future of our nation, our world-wide deterrence
against aggression, the credibility of our president,
our entire way of life are at stake..."

Obama: "I've decided to let Putin handle this.
He's far more competent & honorable. Thank you."

Obama's Congressional lobbyists: "mmm... Never mind."

   Ok, is there ANYONE or ANYBODY out there
   who Obama has NOT stabbed in the back?

"We're on our own," Mohammad Joud, an opposition
fighter in the war-shattered northern city of Aleppo,
said via Skype. "I always knew that, but thanks to
Obama's shameful conduct, others are waking up to
this reality as well."

     Well, now you know how the Israelis feel.


If [the West doesn't use this "pause" as an excuse
to kill Obama's threat to use force, or] Syria's not
serious & its sole intent is the same as Iran's "to
wear out your enemy by diplomacy strategy" then
Assad, like the Palestinians, will begin to come up
with more & more preconditions ("other countries
will also have to agree to give up their stockpiles,"
etc.). But, either way, Assad will have proven me
... after two years of pointless diplomacy
versus a couple of weeks of even a near-credible
threat of military force


Lord, what a bastard's Putin--sitting next to all the
European leaders inspecting his pistol, playing with
the tumbler, cocking the hammer with his thumb, while
running his eye down its barrel: "What?!? Is there any
law against it?" Putin asks, like the worst possible
bully in the school yard ... as Professor Obama looks
the other way, far, far away, preferring to think it has
nothing whatsoever to do with him.


For anybody who thinks the Russians are any less
a bunch of sons-of-bitches than the Soviets:

Russia: Iran Deal Ends Need for Missile Defense


Putin sez: "We have good reason to believe that it was
the Syrian rebels who used chemical weapons against

Dear Mister Putin: Is the reason (above) that you just
want to make yourself appear even more of a buffoon
than you did just with your (horse riding half-naked
in Siberia) imitation of Lady Godiva?

Message in a bottle: "Hey, Putin: Shut-up! When
everybody knows what you're going to say... actually
going out & saying it is an act of self-mockery."


Hey, Pres. Obama, Sen. McCain... what happen to
your Muslim Brotherhood buddies? Huh?
Did the
mean ole Egyptian Army rough them up pretty good?
Does this mean that this is the end of your Islamist
Oh, no, wait a minute: You still have all
those al-Qaida buddies in Syria! Once you start
shipping them arms they'll be ever so grateful they'll
probably invite you to go hunting humans with'em there.
You could hunt Alawites, and Shiites, and Christians,
and Kurds (you guys can even invite Erdogan for that
one). Buddies all!

What you are seeing in Egypt today, Mister Obama,
are the starting death throes of the Islamic Spring:
Apparently, the Egyptians don't want to go back to
the 7th Century. Those among them that have them
like their electric lights too much, and their phones
& trains & tvs & Hollywood blockbusters--Heck, even
the Saudis don't want to go back to the 7th Century:
The Guardians of The Islamic Myths love-to-death
all their flashy planes, fast cars, bubbling jacuzzis
& airconditioned palaces finally making Paradise a
reality here on this earth. Who but a lunatic would
give that up!?

Even Erdogan will have to confront this truth sooner
or later: Yes, a little dictatorship is always good
for the economy (witness Nazi Germany & the Italy of
Mussolini). But eventually dictators like Erdogan need
foreign adventures to distract people from failures at
home--and the inevitable realization that they are not
free men. And Erdogan certainly has been cultivating
plenty of "distractions" all around Turkey, hasn't he!

  Erdogan may be a wild-eyed nut-case rabble-rousing
  lunatic (few doubts there), but at least he should TRY
  to refrain from ranting like one. Now, I can let him
  have a coupon (10% off regular admission) to the
  Diplomatic Speak Mail-Order University if he wishes.
  [One of the professors is Jimmy Carter.]

What's going to happen in Egypt? Well, after Obama
cuts off military aid to the Egyptian Army,* that,
essentially, will give a free hand to the Egyptian
military to REALLY go after the Islamists [the Saudis
know this & are actually pulling for the U.S. to cut
off ties with the Egyptians]. Now, I'm sure this is
NOT what Obama has in mind, but that's what his
missteps are going to bring about in spite of himself:
It's Mr. Obama's Karma, you see. Poor Mr. Obama
has been on the wrong side in every one of his Arab
(& Turkish & Iranian & Palestinian & Israeli & Pakistani
& Syrian & North African & Russian & ) meddlings,
and he'll always be on the wrong side on Egypt & on
Turkey (& so on & so on) forever & ever & ever...

* I was surprised by how headlong (in my opinion) Egypt
went after the Islamists--Surely this isn't going to
please those in the West who think that Islamists (and
fascists, and other fanatics) represent a step toward
democracy. Well, now we know that long before this
Egyptian bolt towards sanity Obama was already cutting
off U.S. military aid to Egypt (to discourage them
from it). It wasn't long after that the Egyptians went
all out against their enemies. And now we know that
Obama had a little before that effectively cut off all
military aid to Egypt.

I must say: I don't know what the IQ of Obama & his
advisers may be, but they have collectively overturned
the whole of the Middle East, almost without exception
for the worst. Invariably always empowering America's
worst enemies, and pulling out the rug from under
America's fewer & fewer allies there: Congratulations,
Mister Obama, Mrs. Clinton (and the rest) on a truly
spectacular display of foreign policy incompetence
which will no doubt cost American lives and treasure
for decades & decades to come!

Now Obama seems Hell-bent on castigating Egypt
(instead of applauding them) for its realizing that
all which Obama & his court of incompetents applauded
in the past was lunacy. Good luck, America, finding
men of good faith abroad willing to stand by the
United States in the future!

I always had my doubts whether the fact that every
foreign move Obama has made in the Middle East has
resulted in the exact opposite of what was intended
(maybe he intended them all to turn out that way)...
But I have very few doubts that this move in Egypt
(cutting off military aid) Obama never intended that
it should turn out as it has.


Judge blocks most motive evidence in Fort Hood massacre trial

FORT HOOD, Texas — A military judge blocked several
key pieces of evidence Monday that prosecutors said
would explain the mindset of the soldier accused in the
2009 shooting rampage at Fort Hood, including his
belief that he had a "jihad duty" to carry out the attack.

  God! If the world does not know what truths it
  has proved of '09 how can it then know what lies
  it has disproved across all centuries? We must stop
  denying the truth when it hurts or offends us, when
  it does not square with our prejudices: Step by step,
  fact by fact, it is the one Guiding Light we have to
  lead us from The Darkness!

  S D Rodrian


Norwegian woman jailed in Dubai after reporting
she had been raped says she has been pardoned.

"Dalelv, a Qatar-based interior designer, was on a
work trip to Dubai when she reported to police that
she had been raped by a colleague at the hotel where
she was staying. She was herself then detained and
charged with having unlawful sex, making a false
statement and illegal consumption of alcohol. A court
last week sentenced her to 16 months in prison,
prompting outrage in Norway."

I was mildly surprised myself that she wasn't
sentenced to 20-to-life...

My question is: What are these European women
doing in Muslim/Arab countries? Is it that they
just haven't been told that women in Muslim lands
are worth approximately one bag of garbage? Don't
they watch television in Europe? Don't they read
history books in Europe? Don't they have newspapers
in Europe? Have they never even once visited ?

There definitely should be law!

It is not for nothing that Muslim men (who know
exactly how much a woman's humanity is worth
out in their streets) keep their women out of sight
and under lock & key. Learn something from that!


The Editorial Board of the Washington Post stated:

"The military’s coup aborted genuine democratic
change." Yeah... And they probably might have said
the same if Hitler's regime had been brought down
by the generals after Hitler too was "democratically"
elected. And now you know what whopping morons
& ignoramuses are in charge of a lot of the West's
"leading" media. So be careful what you read.

ANYBODY watching the Egyptian troubles on TV saw
the Egyptian people REBEL against Morsi's Muslim
Brotherhood tyranny--and incompetence, because
Islamists seek to rule a 21st Century nation of 80
million souls as if it were a 7th Century desert tribe
of 80 barbarians: It never will work. It can never
work. This was not a military coup but the Egyptian
military enforcing the will of the Egyptian people.


"Who could have radicalized these two young
Boston Marathon terrorists?!?" a television
"talking head" just asked...

Well, not necessarily "who" -- "what" would have
been more accurate because all that was necessary
was for these young Muslims to get hold of the
Koran: The Koran's text IS a call for terrorizing
non-Muslims, and rationalizing murder-for-profit.

The Koran's calls for peace and brotherly love are
the calls for peace and brotherly love AMONGST
THE GANG MEMBERS any gang leader must make
to the members of his criminal gang because of
the vile nature their criminality engenders in all
gang members and pirates and highwaymen (in
other words: Mohammed's evil gang):

Both the Jews and the Christians have
many religion-based rules of behavior
("Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not
kill, Thou shalt not commit adultery,
Thou shalt take a day off every week,"
and so forth...)

So too the Muslims. You can find them
in their Koran: Because Islam was
designed by a truly unconscionably
criminal gang leader (Mohammed) to
make it easier for him to control his
gang of murderers and thieves, the
Islamic rules of behavior are quite
different from those of every other
of the world's religions.

For example, Islam is the only "religion"
in which one may murder a man of
property and then have all the murdered
man's property become the property of
the murderer permanently (not to
mention that the murderer is also free
to rape the poor guy's wife, daughter,
sons, and to then enslave them).
[Slavery is still legal and practiced to
this day in every country which has been
Muslim for a couple of hundred years
--It was only this year, 2011, that for
the first time ever human slavery was
finally outlawed in Saudi Arabia...
hopefully slavery will eventually be
outlawed in other long-Muslim countries.]

Try to imagine what might result if in
your country there existed a law
allowing anyone to keep permanently
anything one stole from someone one
murdered (and this was made a
religious duty on top of everything
else)...! And now you know why
Muslim countries cannot function
(nor will they ever be able to function
until Islam is abolished) without they
being the most egregious police
states on this planet... with the
most monstrously inhuman laws
and punishments on their books.

Now, you might say: Of course, Muslims
are only supposed to butcher non-Muslims,
and are law-abiding citizens who care
about their fellow-Muslims. But I am
reminded why couples go on dates--And,
no, honey: it's not to see how the guy
treats you (any woman who doesn't know
a man is going to bend over backwards
to look like a sweetheart on their dates
is a moron): No, it's to see how he treats
the waiter & others, because that's how
he's going to be treating "his woman"
after the honeymoon's over.

All anyone has to do to understand just
how detrimental Islam is to the Muslims
themselves is to read any news about what
Muslims are doing to other Muslims in
EVERY Muslim-majority state on this planet.

  You can not expect to be a thief and
  a murderer out in the street and then
  simply cross the front door into your
  house and expect to be a decent and
  honorable man to your family--It's
  just never going to happen. NEVER.

There are an infinite number of ways
for Christians to "go to Heaven" (good
deeds, or even the mere absence of
evil ones). But there is only one
single way for a Muslim to "enter
straight into Paradise" and that is
to commit suicide while butchering
as many innocent human beings as
possible, all in the name of Islam.
This is because actually sending
people to Heaven was something
that was never in Mohammed's agenda,
obviously... in designing Islam,
Mohammed's only intent was to
program thieves (a very selfish sort
of criminal indeed) to be willing to
sacrifice themselves just to enhance
Mohammed's loot (or, "his Islam").

Mohammed is long dead now, of
course, and yet his heinous program
is still "programming" Muslims the
world over into sacrificing themselves
in the murder of innocents for the
advancement of the vile criminal
enterprise known as Islam which is
Mohammed's legacy to the Muslims
and all their innocent neighbors
to this day!


Those who fear God are obviously
up to no good. If you have to take
away but one lesson from history:
let it be that one.

S D Rodrian

The belief in God is ALWAYS dangerous
because what people believe in is their own
particular god. And, of necessity, every god
is ALWAYS jealous of all the other gods
and always inspires hate and intolerance
(at best)... and savage brutality & murder
& every other vile inhumanity towards
those who believe in the other gods.

The only way Muslims can escape Islam's unholy
bloodlust is for them to escape Islam itself

From North Africa, through Egypt, all
the way to Iraq... that entire region of
the world was once known as The
Fertile Crescent. It gave the world
agriculture, mathematics, arts &
literature, astronomy, modern medicine,
and a hundred other schools of science
and philosophy. It was literally the
cradle of Western Civilization, where
dozens and dozens of cultures and
advanced civilizations managed to
reach heights of social/human
achievements which are to this day
the glory, pride, and triumph of

All these great wonders of civilized
man grew/thrived there until they
were utterly destroyed by the arrival
of that great destroyer of civilizations:
Islam. For no greater crime has ever
been recorded in human history than
the advent of Islam. All that remain
of that consonance of great cultures
& civilizations is the memory of their
glories in our history books... glories
which, by the by, following their
criminal thieving roots, Islamic
traditions are ever shamefully (and
so far futilely) striving to ascribe to

Today: all the lands which once were
known as the Fertile Crescent of the
world are a despicable vapid slum
teeming only with beggars who can
not feed themselves and have no hope
of ever doing so... As not a country
remains Muslim there that is able to
sustain its people except those that are
sucking up their wealth of petroleum
and spitting it out into the bottomless
hole that skeletonizes the soul of those
who are given unearned riches without
also first having acquired the goodness
to use it wisely: The finite wealth of
all the rich Arab oil states is running
through their wicked fingers with such
frightening speed that when the oil
finally runs out they will all of them
be swallowed back up into an even
more desolate and dismal desert than
the one that underscored the advent
of petroleum in the Arab world.

And all of that is unquestionably also
the direct result of Islam's toxic
influence over the ill-starred Arabs.

There is no difference whatsoever
between all the Arab lands and the
land of Israel before the return of
the Jews to their historical patrimony.
Yet, today, whereas the lands of the
Muslims seem doomed to inevitable
perdition and ruin, Israel alone is
a world of plenty and success unto
itself in the Middle East (a tiny strip
of land where wisdom, humanity,
and the all blessings of God bloom
so that it actually exports foodstuffs
and the benefits of its science and
technologies to the rest of the world):
A land where science & the arts stand
heads and shoulders with that of
the rest of the world's, actually
leading them in many categories,
and where social and political
conventions advance the cause of
humanity as nowhere else in the
entirety of the once so Fertile
Crescent [which in the times of
the Roman Empire saw an Egypt
which was the "food basket" of
the ancient world, today hanging
precariously above the cold jaws
of famine by a thin line of charity
from, ironically, the one nation
on earth which Islam has insanely
singled out as its deadliest enemy:
the United States of America! God,
if ever the worst/basest of the
Islamists come to power there
and break that thin line... what
charity then will feed the starving
Egyptian masses?!?]

  That, all that woe, misery,
  wretchedness, and grief is
  the social legacy of Islam to
  Muslim nations and peoples
  which ought not only to have
  progressed into the modern
  world but should by now
  have been amongst its brightest
  leading lights ... and are
  instead still shackled & chained
  by the backward and inhuman
  dark ages which once enslaved
  the human mind up until the
  unlucky age of Mohammed
  ... and from which squalor (but
  for that one singularly sad
  exception of the Muslims) the
  rest of the world has managed
  to break free.

Today the Muslims not only represent
the nadir of human civilization but are
in many ways the greatest peril & threat
to it... for even in the most "progressive"
of their nations the basest Islamic inner
instincts and desires make the Muslims
see themselves as the eternal enemies of
a civilization which, in point of fact, is
basically the sum of all the progress the
world has made since the death of their
Mohammed. You can even see this in Asia,
where, in a sort of slow-motion catastrophe,
nations which are being swallowed up into
the deeper and more destructive digestive
tracks of Islam slowly become appreciably
more and more distant from the modern
world's every aspect... longing, no doubt,
to look like "the Arab slum" looks today.

Look for Europe and America to be next.

Terry Jones’s Koran burning has far-reaching effect:

Suppose the mayor of a city said that
the Mafia was a criminal organization
and its members should be in prison.
And the Mafia murdered some innocent
person to avenge the mayor's statement:
Would you conclude that the mayor
was the person responsible for the
murder of that innocent person?

I seriously doubt any reasonable person
would blame the mayor. And in the same
way, it would be hard to blame those who
condemn the Koran for its indisputable
instigation of almost every heinous and
perverted crime known to man, whether
they ban it, burn it, or dump it in a landfill
(where it clearly belongs).

S D Rodrian

"Jeepers! But we're talking about a
religious group, not the Mafia!"

Really? I've never heard of Catholic
nuns killing people because they've
been insulted. Have you?

Well, I do suppose if Catholic nuns
committed such a murder you WOULD
condemn them then--and not the mayor.

The Koran is the ultimate inspiration and
justification for terrorism against mankind:
that's why it ought to be banned, proscribed,
wherever/whenever: burned! The Koran is
the singular cause of the most inhuman
crimes in history. And if you don't believe
me, believe the boasts of Muslims them-
selves, who truly believe that monstrous
fact is their most shinning achievement!!!

Should we desist confronting/combatting
crime because criminals lash out against it?

It is no doubt difficult for some to fathom
how it can be possible for anyone to be
convinced that the God of all mankind could
possibly sanction and in fact command
murder-for-profit ... as Mohammed does in
the Koran--an indisputable fact which to this
very day Islamic scholars/historians have
been reporting Muslims engaging in as a
religious duty since the time of Mohammed.

  During the First World War Turkish imams,
  citing the Koran as their authority [Koran
  33:50 - "Prophet, We have made lawful to
  you... the slave girls whom God has given
  you as booty" and 4:24 - "all married women
  (are forbidden) to you save those (captives)
  whom your right hand possesses," etc.] told
  Turkish peasants that God wanted them to
  go forth and murder any Armenians they
  could lay their hands on... as a reward for
  which they were to be allowed to rape their
  wives and daughters and take legal possession
  of the murdered Armenians' properties: the
  direct result of this incitement was that some
  1.2 million Armenians were butchered by
  otherwise quite ordinary Turkish peasants
  --as many of them themselves can be seen
  testifying to [this] in filmed documentaries
  on the Armenian Genocide.

But, how does one get people to believe
that the God who created all living creatures
not only sanctions but actually commands
unimaginable brutality and murder on the
scale of the greatest genocide in all human
history against their innocent fellow human
beings? [In other words, how do you get
people to believe the unbelievable/
unreasonable notion that God and Satan
are essentially "moral equivalencies?"]

Is it really possible that any thinking being,
no matter how craven & bestial, can actually
believe that the God that stands in contrast
to the Evil that is Satan would really assign
the goods of those murdered to be forever
after the legal property of the murderers as
a reward for their having committed murder?!?

Most important of all to criminals engaged
in murder-for-profit: believe that God actually
sanctions and even commands the rape and
monstrous torture/murder of women and
innocent little children, above and beyond
merely rewarding the murderers with the
properties/goods of those they brutalize
and murder?

Mohammed simply told his gang members
[the Muslims] that God commands the
conversion of all mankind to his cult, and
that therefore they are free to inflict as
much evil as they wish upon the poor
unfortunates who refuse to convert because
THAT is the punishment God has ordered
to be inflicted upon them for not converting:
That, in sum, is the essence of the Koran,
its central message. Now, I ask you all:
what ought to be done with such a book?

We're all victims of the Koran:
For God' sake blame the murderers
here, not the victims.

S D Rodrian

Revealingly: there are two "organizations" in this
world which demand that any of its members
quitting it should be instantly murdered. The
Mafia is one, and Islam is the other. And, just as
revealing, the reason for this demand in both
organizations is the same: Because its members are
assumed to have priviledged information about its
criminal activities.

On the other hand, Christianity's holy books are in
fact termed "gospels" (in other words, "the good
news"), and are designed to be offered and given
openly to anyone at any time: Whether one agrees
with the notion or not, the Christian holy books are
a sincere attempt to enlighten one's fellow men.

The Koran specifically asks Muslims to not permit
non-Muslims to perouse it (and not surprisingly
so, since it is essentially a road map for the
conquest and subjugation of mankind--even by brute
force and murder if necessary). This criminality
goes to such extent that Islam expressly rewards
the murder of non-Muslims by deeming the
properties & goods of the murdered as belonging
to the murderers (Muhammad even sanctioned the
rape of the murdered non-Muslims' women
and the selling of their surviving family members
into slavery--provided they agreed to convert to

This astonishingly blatant wickedness can be heard in
the filmed "confessions" of many quite ordinary
Turkish soldiers/civilians who participated in the
butchering of hundreds of thousands of innocent
Armenian Christians because "our Imams told us
Islam demanded it... and that all their properties
would then legally belong to us." [The number of
the murdered has been estimated as high
as 1.5 million victims--The Islamic firebrand
Prime Minister of Turkey Erdogan continues
to refuse to acknowledge even a single victim,
and claims there were as many Turkish Muslims
killed as Christian Armenians... a stupendously
insane claim disputed by every historical
institution on earth.]

Who among us does not understand that saying such
a cold-blooded & villainous thing to those Turkish
peoples would prompt endless numbers of
them to make truly unimaginably shocking thieves
and murderers of themselves? But that is exactly
the moral depravity to which Islam brings its
adherents, sooner or later--As anyone who has had
even the least knowledge of the history of Islam
knows ... or who has read a newspaper of late.

Those who deny reality enable our delusions
Know You Why Israel Must Be The Jewish State
Why Israel Must be Recognized As The Jewish State
Iran's Latterday Goering
American academia bites the dust
Anti-Semitism in Belgium Reaches New Heights
Hypocrisy, Deceit, Evil at the UN
The Nakba Hoax In Retrospect
Bigotry, The New York Times & Israel
Brian T. Kennedy article
BBC bias
Obama's Appeasement of the Ayatollahs
Cairo = Benghazi The Writing On The Wall
ME carnage: Appeasement And History's Lessons
Turkey: Another Emerging Islamist Autocracy
How The Western World Is Limiting Free Speech
Who Won Who Lost--On The Gaza Withdrawal
Best Assessment To Date of The Ukrainian Crisis
Worst Waste of Words Ever Writtten (to Obama)

By Caroline B Glick:
How Obama Has Already Killed America
The Obama-Clinton Destruction of America
Obama's Outrageous Plot To Deny Islam's War vs. U.S.
The War America Fights
Europe's Decision To Wage Economic War vs. Israel
America’s Self-Induced Smallness
The Reign of The Fantasists
The Muslim Brotherhood’s American Defenders
The Reign of Imagination
Obama’s Spectacular Failure
Obama’s Dangerous Consistency
Obama and The "Official" Truth
The Anti-Semitism of the State Department
Libya, Jordan and Obama's Narratives
Moral Relativism & Jihad

>Question:  If Islam is so bad why then
                are there so many Muslims?

Retort: And if there were more demons in
Hell than there are angels in Heaven... would
you then become a Devil-worshipper?

There have been any number of disingenuous persons
suggesting that "there have been as many terrible
Christians as Muslims." I cannot address specific
numbers, but the distinction is fundamental: Adolf
Hitler might have been born into a Christian family
but none of his crimes were either sanctioned or
condoned by Christianity or Christians in general,
while not only were the crimes of the Muslims
sanctioned and encouraged (even instigated) by
their Imams but few if any Muslims in general
have ever sought to condemn those outrages.

Christianity finds a human population brutal and
savage and has sought to civilize it, while Islam has
done nothing but worsen the nature of the population
it influences. This is the unstinting lesson of
history with regards to the moral difference
between these two religions.

Irshad Manji wrote in WashingtonPost's
"Anti-Muslim Film Boorish and Boring" ...

> A more engaging approach would have been
> to pepper the film with positive verses from
> the Qur'an, thereby revealing that Muslims who
> expound hostility are actively choosing to ignore
> the better angels of Islam.

Perhaps you could also show highlights of Satan
(Mohammed) himself, in order to better understand
those "high-ranking" angels that "fell" with him:

> There are plenty of positive passages to highlight.
> The possibility for women's dignity is shown by
> 3:195, which states that God rewards "any worker
> among you, be you male or female -- you are equal
> to one another." Imagine aligning that passage with
> the shot of a woman's body mutilated by an honor
> killing.

And, alongside, we could cite, out of the billion-some
Muslims in this world, exactly how many exercise this
heavenly practice... at the peril of their lives. Or,
perhaps simply cite the Muslim women who espousing
the equality of women, are still held in high esteem.

> To shame the imams who cry death to non-Muslims,
> Wilders could have followed their words with these
> from 2:62 of the Quran: "Jews and Christians and
> Sabians, all who heed the One God and the Last
> Day, have nothing to fear or regret as long as they
> remain true to their scriptures."

AND pay the head tax for not being Muslims, of
course (which in most modern Islamic countries is
no longer collected because most of their Jews and
Christians have either been forced to convert, to
flee, or have been butchered).

> Indeed, he could have hammered home this point
> with a shorter, simpler passage -- 109:6, which
> proclaims "unto you your religion, unto me my
> religion."

Is this a Muslim pleading his wish to remain a Muslim
or a Muslim pleading for the rights of non-Muslims...?

[109.1] Say: O unbelievers!
[109.2] I do not serve that which you serve,
[109.3] Nor do you serve Him Whom I serve:
[109.4] Nor am I going to serve that which you serve,
[109.5] Nor are you going to serve Him Whom I serve:
[109.6] You shall have your religion and I shall have
my religion.

> Above all, Wilders missed the opportunity to give
> Wahhabi sermonizers and sympathizers a real run
> for their oil money. He could have done so by
> cutting between their fevered warnings of hellfire
> on the one hand and, on the other, diverse Muslims
> reading 2:256 of the Quran: "There is no compulsion
> in religion."

Perhaps Wilders should have read it not just to the
Wahhabis but to the Indonesians, who recently refused
to legally recognize a Muslim's conversion to Christianity.
Or perhaps he could've cited a single Muslim country
that recognizes and protects a Muslim's right "to not be
forced to remain a Muslim" ... Certainly, Egypt (which
is propped up by American and European aid) must
come the closest when it recently decided to "look the
other way" and instead of throwing Muslim converts
to Christianity in prison or killing them simply advised
them to leave their country of birth and to not return
ever again "for their own safety, of course."

I think, from the 7th Century AD to the 21st Century,
Muslims might still have a little ways ta go before they
can start to play dialectical pleasantries. Instead, for
now, let's just concentrate on how you're going to run
away from the madmen chasing you with the butcher's


S D Rodrian

On Mar 19, 11:06 am, Viejo Vizcacha

> The Islamic troops that intervened in Spain
> did so at the invitation
> of German princes who were quarreling.
> During the"occupation" of Spain
> by Islamist, Spain became the light of Europe...

I'm sorry .... which European Imperialist armies
did you say "reconquered" Spain?!?! Because as
HISTORY tells it, the "reconquista" was one of
Spain by the Spanish. There must certainly have
been any number of European volunteers and
mercenaries who fought on the side of the Spanish
Christians, but, is it that you know of any LAW
by the Moors which forbade non-Spanish Muslims
from Jihad on the other side?!?!?

It was Europe's longest and hardest-fought war
of emancipation --700 years! And it was all done
by the Spanish themselves, who, apparently, were
not as eager as you to believe they were living
Spain's Golden Age (and were therefore eager to
bring it to a close). SURELY, along those 700 years
the Spanish might have come to realize they were
living in paradise--had it been true. But, Spain's
Golden Age came NOT during its subjugation by
the Muslims (as romance-writers might have you
believe) but AFTER its liberation from them, when
Columbus sailed to the Americas and brought back
enough wealth to make Spain the richest country
in Europe.

These films were, for the most part, written by
hacks whose knowledge of the world ended two
city blocks from where they grew up.

The lesson of the Spanish 700-years "reconquista"
for the modern world is certainly how, once taken
over by Muslims, how difficult it is to get rid of
the insistent little buggers... and how it would
have been a lot less of a bother (to the Spanish)
had they NOT been conquered by the Muslims in
the first place:

I have no doubt that if Islam were to take over
the world, eventually mankind would rise up for
its freedom... and would triumph. But it might
take 700 years--700 precious years during which
millions of Leonardos, Mozarts, Newtons, and
Darwins would live lives of pointless, desperate

S D Rodrian

All religions are local.
Only science is universal.

In "Mohammed Cartoons, Part II?"
Lauren Keane wrote in the Washington Post:

>> This time the potential affront is a film made by
>> right-wing Dutch politician Geert Wilders, in which
>> he denounces Islam's Koran as a "fascist" book
>> that "incites people to murder." Rumors put out
>> by the Wilders camp suggest he burns a copy of
>> the Koran in the film.

>> Both cartoon(s) and film are clearly crass and self-
>> serving exercises that pay lip service to the idea of
>> freedom of speech while being little more than
>> vehicles for xenophobia.

Question: Is denouncing NAZI literature as
"fascist" and "inciting people to murder" ...
"clearly crass and self-serving exercises that
pay lip service to the idea of freedom of
speech while being little more than vehicles
for xenophobia?"

Surely the Answer must be that such a
denunciation is either true or false, and
therefore worthy or worthless.

Well, while Hitler could be held responsible for
the murders of up to 65 million human beings,
there are some places in India ALONE where
up to 35 million souls were butchered under
the sanctions of The Koran. The toll of the
Islamic genocide is in the hundreds of millions
of human beings and it is still ongoing with no
end in sight (and that doesn't even begin to take
into consideration the countless civilizations,
including all the Christian ones which once
thrived in and around the fertile crescent, that
were utterly obliterated by Islam... leaving
behind the monstrous ruin and despair you see
today everywhere in the Muslim world there).
Butchery and murder are the school agenda of
most Islamic children and the teachings of hate
never end across the lifetimes of Muslims the
world over... with the possible exception only
of those who have not been converted to Islam
long enough to have yet lost the values of their
previous "human" cultures (as in Thailand, in
Malaysia, in Indonesia, etc.)


Is it possible to libel Mohammed? Could anything
bad enough or objectionable enough ever be said
of this incomprehensibly reprehensible creep which
he himself did not surpass many, many, many
times over with his own vile criminal behavior and
unimaginable personal degradation... as recorded
by his own proud Islamic biographers? VISIT THOU:

Just today the UN OKed Islamic Text
Against Defamation ...

>> The document, which was put forward
>> by the Organization of the Islamic
>> Conference, "expresses deep concern
>> at attempts to identify Islam with
>> terrorism, violence and human rights
>> violations." (!)

Perhaps those who are trying to "defame"
Islam should simply cite the Koran:

   1. [3.151] We will cast terror into the
   hearts of those who disbelieve ...

   1. [8.12] When your Lord revealed to
   the angels: I am with you, therefore
   make firm those who believe. I will cast
   terror into the hearts of those who
   disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads
   and strike off every fingertip of them.

>> The resolution "urges states to take
>> actions to prohibit the dissemination ...
>> of racist and xenophobic ideas" and
>> material that would incite to religious
>> hatred.

Oh, I'm sorry, if what the Islamic resolution
is after is to ban the Koran, then, by all
means, I for one am all for it:

The Koran is a viciously cynical, unrelentingly
martial instructionaire for the conquest and
subjugation of the human race by any and all
means... including encouraging rape & pillage
by the conquerors if they live, and, if they die
in the cause of this immoral conquest, depraved
heavenly rewards which only monstrous Satan
would provide its most loyal/degenerate demons
in Hell.

No, it is religion(s) that should be banned.

It is time for humanity to purge itself of
pernicious and (mostly) vile superstitions
which are not only dragging down our very
humanity but destroying our morality with
hate-mongering and a corrupting fight
against democracy and human rights.

We should pass a universal world-wide law
which states categorically that "things are
either real OR unreal," and that anyone
caught trying to make anyone believe that
a thing unreal IS real is committing a self-
evident fraud (punishable by substantial
prison time).

Yes, it's going to be tough because, frankly,
we are monkeys. And, who among us has
not argued over the living room coffee table
with someone about whether there is or
there isn't a coffee table in the damn living
room? But, it's a struggle to save lives and
to perhaps even push a reluctant mankind
into progressing far enough ahead that we
may survive the next extinction-causing
asteroid that is inevitably coming our way.

On Mar 18, 10:32 am, "Bug-Eyed Churl"

>> Islam is just another "brand" of Judaism.
>> "Orthodox" Christianity, by worshipping three
>> gods, escapes the monotheist trap.
>> D.
I copied the following questions and
answers from another list.

Does it contain a false answer at any point?


1) Does the Qur'an define the word "Allah"?

2) Was the name "Allah" revealed for the
first time in the Qur'an?

3) Does the Qur'an assume that its readers
have already heard of "Allah"?

4) Should we look into pre-Islamic Arabian
history to see who "Allah" was before Muhammad?

5) According to Muslim tradition, was Muhammad
born into a Christian family and tribe?

6) Was he born into a Jewish family or tribe?

7) What religion was his family and tribe?

8) What was the name of his pagan father?
Abdullah (Abd + Allah)

9) Did Muhammad participate in the pagan
ceremonies of Mecca?

10) Did the Arabs in pre-Islamic times
worship 360 gods?

11) Did the pagan Arabs worship the sun,
moon and the stars?

12) Did the Arabs build temples to the Moon-god?

13) Did different Arab tribes give the Moon-god
different names/titles?

14) What were some of the names/titles?
Sin, Hubul, Ilumquh, Al-ilah

15) Was the title "al-ilah" (the god) used
of the Moon-god?

16) Was the word "Allah" derived from "al-ilah?"

17) Was the pagan "Allah" a high god
in a pantheon of deities?

18) Was he worshipped at the Kabah?

19) Was Allah only one of many Meccan gods?

20) Did they place a statue of Hubul
on top of the Kabah?

21) At that time was Hubul considered
the Moon-god?

22) Was the Kabah thus the "house
of the Moon-god"?

23) Did the name "Allah" eventually
replace that of Hubul as the name
of the Moon god?

24) Did they call the Kabah the
"house of Allah"?

25) Did the pagans develop religious
rites in connection with the
worship of their gods?

26) Did the pagans practice the Pilgrimage,
the Fast of Ramadan, running around the Kabah
seven times, kissing the black stone, shaving
the head, animal sacrifices, running up and down
two hills, throwing stones at the devil, snorting
water in and out the nose, praying several times
a day toward Mecca, giving alms, Friday prayers,

27) Did Muhammad command his followers to
participate in these pagan ceremonies while the
pagans were still in control of Mecca?
Yes (Yusuf Ali, fn. 214, pg. 78)

28) Did Islam go on to adopt these pagan
religious rites?
Yes. (Yusuf Ali: fn. 223 pg. 80)

29) Were al-Lat, al-Uzza and Manat called
"the daughters of Allah"?

30) Did the Qur'an at one point tell Muslims
to worship al-Lat, al-Uzza and Manat?
Yes, in Surah 53:19-20

31) Have those verses been "abrogated"
out of the present Qur'an?

32) What were they called? "The Satanic

33) Was the crescent moon an ancient pagan
symbol of the Moon-god throughout the ancient

34) Was it the religious symbol of the Moon-god
in Arabia?

35) Were stars also used as pagan symbols
of the daughers of Allah?

36) Did the Jews or the Christians of Arabia
use the crescent moon with several stars
next to it as symbols of their faith?

37) Did Islam adopt the pagan crescent moon
and stars as its religious symbol?

38) As Islam developed over the centuries,
did it adopt pagan names, pagan ceremonies,
pagan temples and pagan symbols?

39) Is it possible that most Muslims do not
know the pagan sources of the symbols and
rites of their own religion?

40) Are they shocked to find out the true
sources of their ceremonies and stories?

41) Can Islam be the religion of Abraham
if it is derived from paganism?

42) What then is Islam?
A modern version of one of the ancient
fertility cults.

43) Is the "Allah" of the Qur'an, the Christian
God of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit?

44) Do the Jews say that the Muslim "Allah"
is their God too?

45) Then whose god is Allah?

************************************** (S D Rodrian)
wrote in message ...

> It is much more accurate to say
> that the Muslims STOLE
> the scientific databases of
> the peoples they conquered
> (since they originally were in
> reality, mostly illiterate
> Arab nomads)


Apparently you believe that
simply because I cite the horrors
that Arabs/Muslims visited upon
the Hindus (and Islam's genocides
and theft of the treasures of Hindu
civilization) that therefore
I must be Hindu! This is most
amusing, as it betrays you to be
a person who could not imagine
someone moral/ethical enough to
denounce crimes committed against
someone other than himself!
[Don't fret, yours is a very common
flaw in many human beings.]

No: I am not Hindu. It's simply
that the Islamic genocide of
Hindus is without question the
worst crime against humanity on
record, that's all. Please keep
this in mind in the future.

In any case, to remedy my unbalanced approach,
and to help satisfy your thirst for a more
comprehensive historical view, here's the reprint
of a letter sent to Carly Fiorina (then CEO of
Hewlett Packard Corporation, and now I believe
running for public office in California in order
to continue to perpetuate her ignorance on an
even grander scale)... in response to a speech
given by her on September 26, 2001 which you
could once have found at this url

S D Rodrian

        What Arab Civilization?

November 7, 2001
Carly Fiorina
3000 Hanover Street
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1185

Dear Madame Fiorina:

It is with great interest that I read your
speech delivered on September 26, 2001, titled
"Technology, Business and Our way of Life:
What's Next" [sic]. I was particularly
interested in the story you told at the end of
your speech, about the Arab/Muslim civilization.

As an Assyrian, a non-Arab, Christian native of
the Middle East, whose ancestors reach back to
5000 B.C., I wish to clarify some points you
made in this little story, and to alert you to
the dangers of unwittingly being drawn into the
Arabist/Islamist ideology, which seeks to
assimilate all cultures and religions into the
Arab/Islamic fold.

I know you are a very busy woman, but please
find ten minutes to read what follows, as it is
a perspective that you will not likely get from
anywhere else. I will answer some of the
specific points you made in your speech, then
conclude with a brief perspective on this
Arabist/Islamist ideology.

Arabs and Muslims appeared on the world scene in
630 A.D., when the armies of Muhammad began
their conquest of the Middle East. We should be
very clear that this was a military conquest,
not a missionary enterprise, and through the use
of force, authorized by a declaration of a Jihad
against infidels, Arabs/Muslims were able to
forcibly convert and assimilate non-Arabs and
non-Mulsims into their fold. Very few indigenous
communities of the Middle East survived this --
primarily Assyrians, Jews, Armenians and Coptics
(of Egypt).

Having conquered the Middle East, Arabs placed
these communities under a Dhimmi (see the book
Dhimmi, by Bat Ye'Or) system of governance,
where the communities were allowed to rule
themselves as religious minorities (Christians,
Jews and Zoroastrian). These communities had to
pay a tax (called a Jizzya in Arabic) that was,
in effect, a penalty for being non-Muslim, and
that was typically 80% in times of tolerance and
up to 150% in times of oppression. This tax
forced many of these communities to convert to
Islam, as it was designed to do.

You state, "its architects designed buildings
that defied gravity." I am not sure what you are
referring to, but if you are referring to domes
and arches, the fundamental architectural
breakthrough of using a parabolic shape instead
of a spherical shape for these structures was
made by the Assyrians more than 1300 years
earlier, as evidenced by their archaeological

You state, "its mathematicians created the
algebra and algorithms that would enable the
building of computers, and the creation of
encryption." The fundamental basis of modern
mathematics had been laid down not hundreds but
thousands of years before by Assyrians and
Babylonians, who already knew of the concept of
zero, of the Pythagorean Theorem, and of many,
many other developments expropriated by
Arabs/Muslims (see History of Babylonian
Mathematics, Neugebauer).

You state, "its doctors examined the human body,
and found new cures for disease." The
overwhelming majority of these doctors (99%)
were Assyrians. In the fourth, fifth, and sixth
centuries Assyrians began a systematic
translation of the Greek body of knowledge into
Assyrian. At first they concentrated on the
religious works but then quickly moved to
science, philosophy and medicine. Socrates,
Plato, Aristotle, Galen, and many others were
translated into Assyrian, and from Assyrian into
Arabic. It is these Arabic translations which
the Moors brought with them into Spain, and
which the Spaniards translated into Latin and
spread throughout Europe, thus igniting the
European Renaissance.

By the sixth century A.D., Assyrians had begun
exporting back to Byzantia their own works on
science, philosophy and medicine. In the field
of medicine, the Bakhteesho Assyrian family
produced nine generations of physicians, and
founded the great medical school at Gundeshapur
(Iran). Also in the area of medicine, (the Assyrian)
Hunayn ibn-Ishaq's textbook on ophthalmology,
written in 950 A.D., remained the authoritative
source on the subject until 1800 A.D.

In the area of philosophy, the Assyrian
philosopher Job of Edessa developed a physical
theory of the universe, in the Assyrian
language, that rivaled Aristotle's theory, and
that sought to replace matter with forces (a
theory that anticipated some ideas in quantum
mechanics, such as the spontaneous creation and
destruction of matter that occurs in the quantum

One of the greatest Assyrian achievements of the
fourth century was the founding of the first
university in the world, the School of Nisibis,
which had three departments, theology,
philosophy and medicine, and which became a
magnet and center of intellectual development in
the Middle East. The statutes of the School of
Nisibis, which have been preserved, later became
the model upon which the first Italian
university was based (see The Statutes of the
School of Nisibis, by Arthur Voobus).

When Arabs and Islam swept through the Middle
East in 630 A.D., they encountered 600 years of
Assyrian Christian civilization, with a rich
heritage, a highly developed culture, and
advanced learning institutions. It is this
civilization that became the foundation of the
Arab civilization.

You state, "Its astronomers looked into the
heavens, named the stars, and paved the way for
space travel and exploration." This is a bit
melodramatic. In fact, the astronomers you refer
to were not Arabs but Chaldeans and Babylonians
(of present day south-Iraq), who for millennia
were known as astronomers and astrologers, and
who were forcibly Arabized and Islamized -- so
rapidly that by 750 A.D. they had disappeared

You state, "its writers created thousands of
stories. Stories of courage, romance and magic.
Its poets wrote of love, when others before them
were too steeped in fear to think of such
things." There is very little literature in the
Arabic language that comes from this period you
are referring to (the Koran is the only
significant piece of literature), whereas the
literary output of the Assyrians and Jews was
vast. The third largest corpus of Christian
writing, after Latin and Greek, is by the
Assyrians in the Assyrian language (also called
Syriac); see:

You state, "when other nations were afraid of
ideas, this civilization thrived on them, and
kept them alive. When censors threatened to wipe
out knowledge from past civilizations, this
civilization kept the knowledge alive, and
passed it on to others." This is a very
important issue you raise, and it goes to the
heart of the matter of what Arab/Islamic
civilization represents. I reviewed a book

titled How Greek Science Passed to the Arabs, in
which the author lists the significant
translators and interpreters of Greek science.
Of the 22 scholars listed, 20 were Assyrians, 1
was Persian and 1 an Arab. I state at the end of
my review: "The salient conclusion which can be
drawn from O'Leary's book is that Assyrians
played a significant role in the shaping of the
Islamic world via the Greek corpus of knowledge.
If this is so, one must then ask the question,
what happened to the Christian communities which
made them lose this great intellectual
enterprise which they had established. One can
ask this same question of the Arabs. Sadly,
O'Leary's book does not answer this question,
and we must look elsewhere for the answer." I
did not answer this question I posed in the
review because it was not the place to answer
it, but the answer is very clear, the Christian
Assyrian community was drained of its population
through forced conversion to Islam (by the
Jizzya), and once the community had dwindled
below a critical threshold, it ceased producing
the scholars that were the intellectual driving
force of the Islamic civilization, and that is
when the so called "Golden Age of Islam" came to
an end (about 850 A.D.).

Islam the religion itself was significantly
molded by Assyrians and Jews (see Nestorian
Influence on Islam and Hagarism: the Making of
the Islamic World).

Arab/Islamic civilization is not a progressive
force, it is a regressive force; it does not
give impetus, it retards. The great civilization
you describe was not an Arab/Muslim
accomplishment, it was an Assyrian
accomplishment that Arabs expropriated and
subsequently lost when they drained, through the
forced conversion of Assyrians to Islam, the
source of the intellectual vitality that
propelled it. What other Arab/Muslim
civilization has risen since? What other
Arab/Muslim successes can we cite?

You state, "and perhaps we can learn a lesson
from his [Suleiman] example: It was leadership
based on meritocracy, not inheritance. It was
leadership that harnessed the full capabilities
of a very diverse population that included
Christianity, Islamic, and Jewish traditions."

In fact, the Ottomans were extremely oppressive
to non-Muslims. For example, young Christian
boys were forcefully taken from their families,
usually at the age of 8-10, and inducted into
the Janissaries, (yeniceri in Turkish) where
they were Islamized and made to fight for the
Ottoman state. What literary, artistic or
scientific achievements of the Ottomans can we
point to? We can, on the other hand, point to
the genocide of 750,000 Assyrians, 1.5 million
Armenians and 400,000 Greeks in World War One
by the Kemalist "Young Turk" government. This is
the true face of Islam.

Arabs/Muslims are engaged in an explicit
campaign of destruction and expropriation of
cultures and communities, identities and ideas.
Wherever Arab/Muslim civilization encounters a
non-Arab/Muslim one, it attempts to destroy it
(as the Buddhist statues in Afghanistan were
destroyed, as Persepolis was destroyed by the
Ayotollah Khomenie). This is a pattern that has
been recurring since the advent of Islam, 1400
years ago, and is amply substantiated by the
historical record. If the "foreign" culture
cannot be destroyed, then it is expropriated,
and revisionist historians claim that it is and
was Arab, as is the case of most of the Arab
"accomplishments" you cited in your speech. For
example, Arab history texts in the Middle East
teach that Assyrians were Arabs, a fact that no
reputable scholar would assert, and that no
living Assyrian would accept. Assyrians first
settled Nineveh, one of the major Assyrian
cities, in 5000 B.C., which is 5630 years before
Arabs came into that area. Even the word 'Arab'
is an Assyrian word, meaning "Westerner" (the
first written reference to Arabs was by the
Assyrian King Sennacherib, 800 B.C., in which
he tells of conquering the "ma'rabayeh" --
Westerners. See The Might That Was Assyria, by
H. W. F. Saggs).

Even in America this Arabization policy

continues. On October 27th a coalition of seven
Assyrian and Maronite organizations sent an
official letter

to the Arab American Institute asking it to stop
identifying Assyrians and Maronites as Arabs,
which it had been deliberately doing.

There are minorities and nations struggling for
survival in the Arab/Muslim ocean of the Middle
East and Africa (Assyrians, Armenians, Coptics,
Jews, southern Sudanese, Ethiopians,
Nigerians...), and we must be very sensitive not
to unwittingly and inadvertently support Islamic
fascism and Arab Imperialism, with their
attempts to wipe out all other cultures,
religions and civilizations. It is incumbent
upon each one of us to do our homework and
research when making statements and speeches
about these sensitive matters.

I hope you found this information enlightening.
For more information, refer to the web links
below. You may contact me at for further questions.

Thank you for your consideration.

Peter BetBasoo

Web resources:
Brief History of Assyrians:
Assyrian International News Agency:
Assyrian American National Federation:
Assyrian Academic Society:
Zinda Magazine:
Beth Suryoyo:
Nineveh Online:
World Maronite Union:
Maronite Research Council:
World Lebanese Organization:
Coptic Web:
thanks: Peter BetBasoo (
On Feb 26, 10:59 pm, Jim wrote:
>> wrote:

> The So-Called "Clash of Civilizations" ...

> "Nowhere in the world are Christians or Jews trying
> to kill Muslims simply because they are Muslims. But
> everywhere in the world Muslims are trying to kill
> Christians and Jews (and other non-Muslims) simply
> and solely because they are non-Muslims (or just
> simply different sort of Muslims)."

> Now THAT is the crux of the problem defining the
> so-called "clash of civilizations" today. And if you
> don't recognize it, and try to solve it, it will
> continue until we do recognize it and solve it.

S D Rodrian

All religions are local.
Only science is universal.
>> Haven't read much history, have you?

No: I got it wholesale from the Muslims: Everybody
Muslim boasts of it. Their holy books call for it (and
because Muslims are not free to be or not to be
Muslims ON PAIN OF DEATH), no matter what a Muslim
may say to a non-Muslim (NOTE: the Koran admonishes
Muslims never to permit non-Muslins to read it
because... it is a plan for the military conquest of
all non-Muslims--Surprise!)... it is the mantra they
are taught from DAY ONE: That non-Muslims are
THE ENEMY ... not to be pitied as Christians think of
non-Christians, or to be loved as some Indian sects
admonish, but to be SLAUGHTERED (unless they
of course, and join them in the hunt of non-Muslims).

And, pray tell, what does one do with THE ENEMY?

Well, the Koran is very specific about this (because
it assumes Muslims will have been turned into
brainless morons by their religion): Slaughter them
if they do not convert (except for Jews and Christians
who are "permitted" to live if they pay a tax (which
is, a ransom--"blackmail" is such a nasty word) of
between 30 to 90 percent annually, as specified in
Sharia (Islamic law)). This is why the European
Imperialists found some handful of impoverished
Jews and Christians still in Islamic countries when
they were competing for empire.

Moronover, [sic] the Koran also specifies that Muslims
are to slaughter non-Muslims ONLY as long as they are
more powerful militarily (which is why the large and
ancient Jewish communities Mohammed found in Mecca
and in Medina he slaughtered so brutally that even his
butchering followers admonished him on it and he
relented, agreeing to not slaughter any child that did
not yet have pubic hair but instead forcing the child to
become a Muslim... while not taking up the opportunity
of confronting the Eastern Roman Empire which in
Mohammed's time still had the power to oppose him):

The Koran (the plan composed/set down in writing
by Mohammed, dictated because he himself was
reputed to be illiterate) insists: If THE ENEMY
is militarily stronger than you, then agree to
any convenient truce while you strengthen
yourself (which is why Hamas is asking Israel
for an "extended truce" and why Iran is asking
The Stoopid West for continued & continued &
continued negotiations and continued diplomacy
in their NUKES quest--because they are following
the plan ... that is, the Koran, which if any of
the idiots who rule Europe and America would
simply READ everything would be revealed to
even their idiotic eyes--but, you couldn't get
George Bush to read a "Dick & Jane" first reader,
let along the fucking Koran).

> Which muslim country has occupied a non
> muslim country?

ALL countries now Islamic (with the exception of
Indonisia & environs, which were convinced to become
Muslim by mullahs who, after Krakatoa exploded told
them it was God's punishment for not being Muslims
(which the poor saps bought it); and, once Muslim,
Muslims make sure you don't go back with very
specific laws that if any Muslims changes his religion
he/she is to be SLAUGHTERED by anybody at hand
including his/her children or parents)... ALL countries
now Muslim were conquered by their Muslim neighbors:
ALL, except India
which, after the greatest carnage/genocide in human
history (with some places in India/Pakistan/
Afghanistan & environs boasting of as many as 85
million non-Muslims butchered)... proved too large:
After the slaughter of 100s of millions of Hindus and
other poor souls who were all basically peacefully
resigned philosophically/religiously to whatever fate
the world has to offer... rose up and again became
belligerent enough to fight back and stop the Islamic
slaughter/genocide prior to the British showing
up there.

... are you beginning to gleam why SLAUGHTER is a
quality/condition so inseparable from Muslims/Islam?

If not, then perhaps you should do a little research
on all of this (provided, of course, you have already
gone through that "Dick & Jane" first reader):

just visit


Or, you could do a little research for yourself.

Or just simply read The Koran:

And some of the controversies about it:

Then, when you watch Muslims on your TV
lying through their teeth to the American public
you at least will know enough to laugh (or cry
when you note that no one will challenge their
outrageous/deadly lies).

BEGIN QUOTE: (sifu) wrote:

> Is that why the Jews enjoyed the
> hositality of the Islamic states in
> Spain for 800 years and also in
> Jerusalem. You have quoted many ayats.
> However YOU are NOT a scholar of Islam.
> You have not read the letter
> signed by Hadrat Umar Ibn al Kathab,
> the second Caliph of Islam who,
> based on the teachings of the Holy
> Prophet Muhammad sallah alaiwassalam,
> let ALL people go about their faith
> and business as usual.

Nor have I read Caliph el Loko's
call for muslims to embrace love and
compassion for all non-muslims. But
I'm sure it exists--So what? In what
way does it help the victim of a murder
that the whole world love him but
one?!?! It's futile for me to point out
to you, sir, that it is not the
Koran's calls for love and peace that
have butchered 100s of millions of
human beings in the course of the
Islamic genocide against non-muslims
(which is going on to this day, as there
are tribes in Kashmere which are
on the brink of extinction at the hands
of the Muslims)... it is the
Koran's calls for terrorism and genocide
that have moved the "pious Muslims" to
those inhuman actions.

The Koran may be mere words, sir. But
what cannot be AND OUGHT NEVER be
ignored is the fact that no Muslim will
condemn even the most egregiously
barbaric and savage portions of the
Koran! (Some of which you can read
for yourself at the end of this post.)
Will you? No you will not. You will
instead cite those utterly irrelevant
calls for love and the brotherhood
of men which have never caused anybody
any trouble in the whole sorry
history of Islam's existence. The true
terror of Islam is indeed in the
terror of even the most "decent-minded"
Muslim to stand up for decency. That
says all there is to say about the nature
of Islam, sir. And no one need be
any sort of scholar to understand that
gut-real truth.

> While Europe was living in
> the Dark Ages in mud
> huts Cordoba, the Capital of Muslim
> Spain the citizens were living in
> a city with street lighting, sewage
> systems, and warm water. The first
> university in Europe was made
> by Muslims in Andalucia.

No doubt, no doubt it must have
been Paradise on earth... living under
the Muslims in Spain. So all the more
perplexing then that the Spaniards
themselves invested 500 brutal bloody
years of revolution and war to rid
themselves of their Muslim "benefactors,"
eh?! Me, I don't even put up an
argument if my pizza is delivered
cold and gummy.

> People who
> wanted to learn about science had
> to know Arabic because the Muslims
> were the most highly educated. They
> made great advances in science, in
> medicine, in astrology, physics,
> maths, recovered and translated the
> knowledge of the Romans and Greeks
> which had been destroyed by the
> Europeans.

What a croc, sir! That is one of the
most gigantic "big lies" of history:

For your edification ALL that so-called
"Islamic" science is Greek science.
The fall of the Roman Empire and the
overrun of Europe by barbarians broke
the thread of history there, and the
Muslims' only (real) contribution is
that somehow they managed to avoid
using what remained of ancient Greek
civilization as firewood. Check your
history again and you will discover
that there was no significant advance
in science since the fall of the Roman
empire and the renaissance (even
almost unto the rise of the British one
and the subsequent beginnings of the
Industrial Revolution, yesterday).

What Muslim "scholars" added (mostly
in practical medicine, because of
their lack of scruples about cutting up
people, living or dead) can be
summed up in the same manner one
sums up their great Islamic achievements
in architecture: They copied/stole, sir, they
copied/stole. The Arab Muslims were utterly
illiterate barbarians just out of the
desert, and their only original
achievement is the camel. Throughout
the Islamic conquest, what the Islamic
barbarians did not destroy (the same
way they recently destroyed the great
Buddahs in Afghanistan), they shamelessly
converted into Islamic ... mosques (like
the Hagia Sophia Church in Constantinople,
now a mosque--yet God-forbid a mosque
should ever be made a church: the entire
Islamic world would rise up against that outrage)
... after which you saw the sprouting of
mosques (in the style of the Hagia Sophia
Church) elsewhere. Even the great Taj Mahal
in India is really an ancient Hindu temple to
Shiva which the Muslims have desecrated
just as they desecrated every Christian
Church they ever got hold of, and even the
holiest ground in the promised land, the
Temple of The Lord at Jerusalem originally
built by Solomon [even after Mohammed himself
was reported to have been annihilated by God
for having violated the sanctity of the House
of The Lord with his filthy presence]. ALL the
wealth Muslims have ever owned they have
stolen from the people who originated that
wealth until the coming of petroleum. And ALL
the splendor of Islamic "civilization" has been
the enjoyment by the Muslims of all they
managed to steal from their rightful owners.
They are, have always been, and ever will be
ignorant and blind to true civilization as long as
they are under the unforgiving pathological
enslavement of Islam. Once the petroleum runs
out, the Arabs will be swallowed up by their
brutal culture right back into the desert from
which they came, for, until the coming of
petroleum there NEVER was a single moment
in all of Islamic history when their "greatness"
was not a thing stolen from somebody else...
no matter what any Hollywood movie says. SEE:

> In Islam a person is only allowed to attack a
> soldier and not civilians.

Well, you should tell that to the
massacred at the twin towers. You
should tell that to the 300,000 (or
maybe as many as 1.5 million) Arminiam
massacred. You should tell that
to the countless HUNDREDS of millions
of Hindus and others massacred
by the Muslims. I'm sure it will make
them rest better in their graves,
all those women and children soldiers.

> Your knowledge of Islam is futile.

My knowledge of Islam is enough. My
knowledge of Muslims and their crimes
is already too much to bear. I wish the
world had never heard of the bastards.
And I am certain I am not the only one
who wishes that. And I, for one, do not
need to know the color of my murderer's
underwear. I know this:

If Islam is the ultimate major
source of terrorism in today's
world, and it absolutely is (or
just take the Islamic terrorists
themselves at their word when
they all cite the Koran as their
marching orders)... then it's better
that the whole world start
looking into the reason why Islam
is the greatest source of evil
in the world, instead of pretending
its sulfuring festering open wound
is a lovely blue pool from which
"for some inexplicable reason" pus
seems to be oozing from it on a
regular basis: For centuries the world
thought disease was caused by magic,
and it was not until the world finally
confronted the real cause of
disease that the world has finally
begun to control pestilence.

I tell you this: Not until Islamic
"scholars" themselves begin to
confront the evil of Islam will that
evil begin to come under some
control. And it's for the benefit of
Muslims themselves that this
ought to be done, for the Islamic
world is STILL in the grips of a
savage and brutal dark ages which
far surpasses the European Dark
Ages ... the West put behind it
CENTURIES AGO. The saving grace
of the Christian world has, ever
since the European Dark Ages, been
that there are so many Christian
sects (preventing any one of them
from brainwashing Europeans with
a lot of religious gibberish). And
what the Islamic world is in dire
need of is its own Martin Luthers
to demand a frank and open discussion
among Muslims of those portions
of the Koran which are self-evidently
more Satanic than sacred:

   [8.12] When your Lord revealed
   to the angels: I am with you,
   therefore make firm those who
   believe. I will cast terror into
   the hearts of those who disbelieve.
   Therefore strike off their heads
   and strike off every fingertip
   of them.

Meaning, pure and simple, and without
any apologies: Terrorize non-muslims
to your heart's delight. Make it as
gruesome as you care to make it. And
throughout the history of the Islamic
conquest... it has been spectacularly
gruesome, as uncounted millions of
innocents have been butchered, not by
a handful of renegade fundamentalists,
but by the full power of the Muslim
states and potentates. And now you
might be starting to get an inkling of
the desperation with which the Muslim-
besieged Christian communities of the
holy land begged for help from their
European brethren before the coming of
the historical first European crusades.

   [Sahih Muslim
   Book 019, Number 4366:]
   It has been narrated by 'Umar b.
   al-Khattib that he heard the Messenger
   of Allah (may peace be upon him)
   say: I will expel the Jews and
   Christians from the Arabian Peninsula
   and will not leave any but Muslim.

Who among you can really believe
that a pious person can trust that
what his "bible" says is true, and yet
that he can somehow ignore the
command (above)... without doubting
his faith and commitment?! It is
no coincidence that the terrorists
involved in the September 11 massacre
are all reported by their families and
neighbors as being exceptionally
pious and devoted believers, "quiet
and honest" persons who spent their
days in meditation at the local mosques
(as not as criminals/ruffians). It's such
a universal picture of them [cliche] that
the FBI could have predicted "which"
Muslims would turn the deadliest terrorists
just from seeing which of them proved
the most pious and quiet and devoted,
honest and full of Islamic humility and

   [Sahih Muslim
   The Book of Faith (Kitab Al-Iman)
   Book 001, Number 0033:]
   It has been narrated on the authority
   of Abdullah b. 'Umar that the
   Messenger of Allah said: I have
   been commanded to fight against people
   till they testify that there is no god
   but Allah, that Muhammad is the
   messenger of Allah, and they establish
   prayer, and pay Zakat and if they
   do it, their blood and property are
   guaranteed protection on my behalf
   except when justified by law,
   and their affairs rest with Allah.

The above verse from the Koran
explicitly orders that Muslims respect
the lives and properties ONLY of
Muslims (those who "testify," or "Allah's
Witnesses," so to speak). This implies
one truly monstrous suggestion...
that the lives and properties of non-
Muslims are forfeit de facto. And
throughout history Muslim conquerors
and criminals have reaped untold
treasures from non-Muslims, no less
than millions and millions of innocent
lives whose sole "crime" was that they
lived within reach of Muslims and
owned properties worth stealing even
at the cost of all their lives.

   [9.29] Fight those who do not
   believe in Allah, nor in the latter day,
   nor do they prohibit what Allah
   and His Apostle have prohibited, nor
   follow the religion of truth, out of
   those who have been given the Book,
   until they pay the tax in acknowledgment
   of superiority and they are in
   a state of subjection.

The Koran does not say, "Jews and
Christians are your equal, so respect
and honor them as equal." Instead it
explicitly says (above) that they (the
Jews and the Christians) are to be
forced to acknowledge the superiority
of Islam and that they (Jews and
Christians) are in a state of subjection.
Need anyone say anything more on
why it is that the Saudis and others will
only permit near them non-Muslims
who are willing to give their lives to
save theirs? Need anyone explain why
Israel will NEVER have borders which
are secured by international or local
treaties? [Obama is living proof (if such
proof ever was needed) that the Jews
of Israel must NEVER put their survival
in the hands of ANYONE but themselves.]

   [9.123] O you who believe! fight
   those of the unbelievers who are near
   to you and let them find in you
   hardness; and know that Allah is with
   those who guard (against evil).

It is a religious duty for all pious
Muslims to fight their non-Muslim
neighbors. And it is only the secular
Islamic tyrants who have suppressed
this religious duty, in Turkey, Egypt,
Pakistan, and the rest of them (all
the dear friends and allies of George
Bush and company). But how long do
you imagine dictators of any sort last?
Do you really believe that the
"aspirations" of native populations can
be denied for ever? Well, that's
what the West has staked its future on!

   [4.74] Therefore let those fight in
   the way of Allah, who sell this
   world's life for the hereafter; and
   whoever fights in the way of Allah,
   then be he slain or be he victorious,
   We shall grant him a mighty reward.

What general would not wish to command
men pious enough to believe what
their "bible" tells them (above)... that
if they die in the battle (and what Muslim
general fights a battle which isn't "in the
way of Allah?!") they shall be rewarded
in the afterlife for their count of enemy

   From the Sunnah of the Prophet
   (the "other leg" of the Koran):
   [9:5] But when the forbidden
   months are past, then fight
   and slay the Pagans wherever
   ye find them, and seize them,
   beleaguer them, and lie in wait
   for them in every stratagem

Since time immemorial Muslims have
been urged by verses like the one
above into merciless acts of terror
against non-Muslims. And frankly
today's Islamic acts of terror pale in
comparison with historical ones
in which literally MILLIONS of non-
Muslims were slaughtered wholesale
and their lands and properties looted
as the reward for their murderers.
Even the bloody Twentieth Century
began with the Muslim genocide of
the Armenian christians at the hands
of the Muslim Turks.

Want to know more? SEE:

I know there are those of you out there
who will scoff, asserting that nobody "here"
takes the Bible seriously now. That's true.
Nobody NOW, in today's Western secular
humanistic world takes the Bible seriously
(outside a few pathetic christian evangelicals
and fundamentalists), but back in the
European Dark Ages... who did not take
the Bible to be absolutely and literally the
sacred word and holy commands of God?
Well, the point IS that the Islamic world
is NOT a secular humanistic one but one
which is STILL as deeply mired in its own
Dark Ages as was the West centuries ago.
It was nothing back then for Europeans
to burn innocent lonely old ladies as
witches, and it's nothing today for even
the most "respectable" and "decent and
honest" and "most admired (by the West)"
Muslims to stone people to death, to cut off
the hands of bicycle thieves, and to carry
out every other sort of unimaginably
unspeakable barbarities as the "brightest
light of Islamic civilization" Muslims can
cite. The fact that the Egyptian and
Turkish dictators do not do this is "proof"
in the eyes of their more pious native
populations that they are corrupt puppets
of the infidel West.

It is not some secular stubborn gang
of diehards that simply refuse
to accept peace with Israel... it is
the explicit demands written in
the Koran which demand the removal
of non-Muslims from the Hebrews's
promised land, as well as explicitly
calling for terrorism against
non-Muslims: THAT is never going
to be "fixed" by ignoring that such
facts are real! These "sacred" demands
are part of the Muslim believers'
core of religious duties, and they shall
remain there as they have remained
to this day. And what does it matter
if a few opportunists and criminals
like the dictators who have seized power
in so many Islamic countries have the
ability to keep their states from obeying
the dictums of the Koran? Eventually
they will be overthrown by pious
Muslims who, like Khomenei in Iran
who will immediately order their states
into massive religious wars... as they
are explicitly commanded to do
in the Koran (which see) be they cold
or hot wars. And the West is
being foolish to the core in arming
the armies of these secular tyrants

[In Iraq today George W. Bush is actually
arming the very army Americans will eventually
have to fight! Yes: The Iraqi Army is already
in the hands of Shi'ite militia people who have
expressedly sworn that they are ready to join
the Iranian Army in its war against America. What
George Bush is still doing in Iraq I don't know!]
(in the vain hope perhaps that they
can prevent their own native Islamic
populations from establishing Islamic
republics maybe?)... ultimately only
to see such Islamic republics use
those very same West-supplied weapons
turned against them, or simply against
innocent populations whose sole
"crime" is that they happen to be the
Muslims' closest neighbors.

That, the West's self-defeating attitude
in dealing with Muslim states
and Muslim populations, no less than
their chevalier attitude with regard
to its (the West's) dependence on
Gulf petroleum... has mitigated the
Muslim world's inability to compete
in the modern world. For the Muslim
world can never escape its Dark Ages
on its own: Modernity is the direct
result of the free flow of information,
and Islam depends for its survival
on maintaining Muslim populations
ignorant of just how bad they have it.
This absolute incompatibility between
modernity and Islam will (the minute
the oil runs out) throw the Arabs back
into the REAL dark ages again (it shall be
for the petroleum Muslims, like waking
from a glimpse of Paradise, and finding
themselves once again in Hell): And
the only thing the West really has
anything to worry about is the possibility
that nuclear technology has not
been sold to Muslims with dark ages
mentalities and frames of mind. Ooops,
too late: Pakistan, remember? And,
perhaps Iran as well... who knows?
[I personally believe that it is Pakistan
which will eventually prove the deadliest
nightmare the West will face...]

No doubt in heartfelt thanks to the Americans
who have wasted their lives to prop up his
criminal regime, and to the American tax-
payers who have starved themselves to pour
uncounted billions of dollars into the pointless
"rebuilding" of his country... in an October 23,
2011 (AP) "interview broadcast on Saturday ...
Karzai made the comment (to the private GEO
television station in Pakistan) that if the
United States and Pakistan ever went to war,
Afghanistan would back neighboring Pakistan."
[This is pretty much the same statement that
the Iraqi generals made concerning a war
between the United States and Iran. Frankly,
it would not surprise me at all if instead of
believing that the Americans are simply
whopping all-day suckers/ignoramuses, it
would not surprise me if the Pakistanis and
Afghanis weren't seriously contemplating
the notion that the Americans absolutely
must be mentally damaged in some way.]

And still, the whopping American suckers,
both democrats and republicans, press on
building up the very Islamic armies they will
undoubtedly have to fight one day, because
religious fanatics will never quit the fight
(and the Koran specifically commands
Muslims to sign a "false treaty" with more
powerful non-Muslims and then to betray
that "treaty" when they become powerful
enough to do so). Thank you America!

Any peace treaty you sign with Muslims today
will tomorrow provide good paper on which
Muslims will write your death warrants: Do not
believe just me on this: believe the Koran
which Muslims will NEVER disobey.

> The picture of the Muslim soldier
> advancing with a sword in onehand
> and the Qur'an in the other is quite false.

I tend to believe the testimony
of millions of the victims
of Islamic conquest and genocide.
I tend to believe the Koran
when it itself says:

1. (Koran 8:12) "Remember Thy
Lord inspired the angels (with the
message): "I am with you: give
firmness to the believers, I will
instill terror into the hearts of
the unbelievers, Smite ye above
their necks and smite all their
finger tips of them."

In the above verse the "great"
prophet of Islam, Mohammed, is giving
step by step instructions on how
to torture and kill the unbelievers
if they don't follow Islam. He is
clearly instructing Muslims to
commit cold-blooded murder and
mayham in the name of religion.

2. (Koran 2:216) "Warfare is
ordained for you, though it is hateful
unto you; but it may happen that
you hate a thing which is good
for you and it may happen that
you love a thing which is bad for
you. Allah knoweth, you knew not."

The above verse was stated by
Mohammed after his first terrorist
attack. He and his followers
mercilessly massacred four innocent
and unarmed merchants at Nakhla
in 623 AD. The massacre came in
January, the sacred month of Rejeb.
Arabs regard this month as a
sacred month, when warfare and
violence is forbidden. Since this
barbaric criminal act was led and
sanctioned by the "great" prophet
Mohammed, we can conclude that
Islam's sacred activities include the
looting and cold-blooded murder of
innocent individuals. The very
beginnings of Islam are stained
with the blood of innocents.

By stating the above verse, Mohammed
completely absolved himself from
all blame for having murdered
innocents. The most insidious
and devilish implication of this
verse is that God is completely
justifying Mohammed's murder of
the innocent Meccans. The import
of this verse is that killing and
violence are JUSTIFIED for Muslims,
because they are doing it by divine
ordinance! It is a religious
duty of every Muslim to murder
anyone who stands in the way of
Islam. Since it is also the duty of
every Muslim to ensure that
the entire world is converted to
Islam by force if necessary, one
must directly conclude that it is
the religious duty of Muslims to
kill all those who are non-Muslim.
This conclusion is derived
directly from the supreme edict of
Allah, who admonishes that even
the Muslim who feels it is wrong
to kill, must murder in the name
of Allah, otherwise one is not a true
Muslim. Over and above this,
Mohammed is hypocritically implying
that warfare is hateful to him,
but he participated in it because
God ordained it.

3. (Koran 69:30-37) "It is not for
any Prophet to have captives
until he hath made slaughter in
the land. You desire the lure of this
world and Allah desires for you
the hereafter and Allah is Mighty,
Wise.. Now enjoy what you have
won as lawful and good and keep your
duty to Allah. Lo! Allah is forgiving,

This verse is in reference to the
prisoners that Mohammed held for
ransom after the battle of Badr.
This battle occurred on March 17,
623 AD. This is the month of Ramadan
--another sacred month for the
Muslims! In this battle, Mohammed
and his followers killed at
least 70 innocent merchants from
the Quraysh tribe of Mecca and
slaughtered several hundred soldiers
who came forward to defend them.

Here God the "Merciful" is saying
that all the non-believers deserve
to be killed! In addition, God is
conveniently commenting that whatever
loot Mohammed has plundered is
"lawful and good" because it was done
in service to God. So murder, rape,
plunder and destruction are all made
perfectly legal with the Muslim God
as long as they are done in the name of
Islam! Mohammed is also insidiously
making himself seem very kind for
having [uncharacteristically] spared the
lives of the prisoners, when in fact he
only let them live so he could ransom
their lives for more money. In today's
world this is called "taking hostages" and
defines "Terrorism" of the worst kind.

4. (Koran 69:30-37) "(It will be said)
Take him and fetter him and
expose him to hell fire. And then
insert him in a chain whereof
the length is seventy cubits. Lo!
he used not to believe in God
the tremendous, and urged not
on the feeding of the wretched.
Therefore hath he no lover hear
this day nor any food save filth
which none but sinners eat."

The above verses from the Koran
prove that Muslims are specifically
instructed not to tolerate unbelievers.
It directly states that people who
do not believe in Mohammed and
the Islamic God are to be tortured
and murdered.. Not only does this
verse clearly indicate that unbelievers
must be tortured and killed, it goes on
further to state prescribed methods for
committing torture. The horrific acts
mentioned above are in practice
even today in Islamic countries. In
fact, in India, Muslims tortured
the Sikh Gurus and their families
exactly as prescribed by the Koran.
For example, the Sikh guru Tegh
Bahadur was imprisoned in a cage
like a wild animal, when he refused
to forsake his religion for Islam.
Three of his disciples were
murdered in front of his eyes. One
of them was Bhai Mati Das. He
was sawed alive into little pieces
(anyone who follows the exploits of
al-Qaida today should be familiar
with this practice). The other was
wrapped up in cotton and burnt alive.
Bhai Dyala, the third one, was boiled
alive in a cauldron. Guru Tegh Bahadur
himself was brutally tortured and
killed in a similar fashion. One
wonders at the mercy of "The all
beneficent Allah" who enjoys watching
the roasted burnt flesh of hapless
innocents falling off their bones.

5. (Koran 5: 33-34) "The only
reward of those who make war
upon Allah and His messenger
and strive after corruption in
the land will be that they will be
killed or crucified, or
have their hands and feet and
alternate sides cut off, or
will be expelled out of the land.
Such will be their degradation
in the world, and in the Hereafter
theirs will be an awful doom;
Save those who repent before ye
overpower them. For know that
Allah is forgiving, merciful."

6. (Koran 22: 19-22) "These
twain (the believers and the
disbelievers) are two opponents
who contend concerning their
Lord. But as for those who
disbelieve, garments of fire will be
cut out for them, boiling fluid
will be poured down their heads.
Whereby that which is in their
bellies, and their skins too,
will be melted; And for them
are hooked rods of iron. Whenever,
in their anguish, they would go
forth from thence they are driven
back therein and (it is said unto
them): Taste the doom of burning."

7. (Koran 76: 4) "Lo! We have
prepared for disbelievers chains,
yokes and a blazing fire."

The above verses clearly state
extreme terrorist activities, as
they contain nothing but detailed
recipes of horrific torture.
Cutting off the hands and feet of
individuals and then making
them walk and jump, pouring
boiling waters over their victims,
making them drink it, burning them
alive, inserting hot iron rods into
their bodies, dismemberment
and disembowelment, genital
mutilation etc. are common Islamic

Koran 17:16-17 When we decide
to destroy a population, we send
a definite order to them who have
the good things in life and
yet transgress; so that Allah's word
is proved true against them:
then we destroy them utterly. How
many generations have we
destroyed after Noah? And enough
is thy Lord to note and see
the Sins of his servants

Here Allah, the God of the Muslims
is clearly stating the exact method
that he adopts when he commits
genocide of an entire POPULATION.
And why does Allah decide to destroy
entire populations? Simply because
they don't believe in Allah and so
Allah will kill them all, to take
revenge. Next Allah is indulging in
an unbelievable display of conceit.
He is actually BOASTING about how
many generations he has destroyed
after Noah. If Allah had a list of his
merits, no doubt genocide of
numerous generations of people
would top his list. Allah enjoys
watching the annhilation of thousands
of Non-Muslims at the hands of
his pious followers, the Muslims.

[Koran 8:37] In order that Allah may
seperate the impure from the pure,
Put All the impure ones (Non-Muslim),
one on top of the another in
a Heap and cast them into Hell. They
will be the ones to have lost

The "All-Merciful Allah" is now
specifically instructing all "peace-
loving Muslims" to heap up a mountain
of corpses of the non believers.
Of course, in order to do this holy
task for Allah, the Muslim must
first go out and attack innocent Non-
Muslims and massacre them so
that Allah's wishes are fulfilled. Allah
seems to have an inexhaustible
thirst for the blood of innocents. Note
that the reason given to massacre
non-believers is that "Allah may
seperate the Impure from the Pure."
It has nothing to do with self-defense
or protection as Muslims like to argue.
The explicit purpose for this heinous
crime is so that Allah can easily
differentiate between the Muslims and
Non-Muslims. This way it becomes
a lot easier for Allah and his "angelic"
helpers to dump the heaps of
murdered Non-Muslims into Hellfire.

[Koran 21:11] How many were the
populations we utterly destroyed because
of their inequities, setting up in
their place other peoples

Again Allah is boasting about his
amazing exploits such as genocide
and displacement of innocent people.
The justification for this crime
is that these innocent people had
"inequities". Apparently any
community which is not Muslim is
full of inequities by Islamic
definition and therefore fair game
for all pious Muslims to massacre
and plunder.

[Koran 2:8-10] In their (Non-Muslims)
hearts is a disease; and Allah
has increased their disease and
grievous is the penalty they will
incur, because they are false.

So Allah not only exhorts Muslims
to kill all the non-believers, he
also strikes down the surviving
ones with disease and pain. Any good
Muslim must surely carry out their
beloved Allah's word. In fact
Allah's word seems to be very much
in effect in today's world. This
is why one sees pious, Allah-loving
Muslims like Saddam Hussein nursing
factories that make weapons of
biological and chemical warfare. Saddam
is complying perfectly with Allah's
wishes to the letter when he
manufactures strains of deadly
viruses to be unleashed on unsuspecting
non-believers like the Israelis and
Americans. He has secured a place
in Islamic "Jannat" (Paradise) for
himself by following Allah's orders
so religiously.

[Koran 58:5] Those who resist Allah
and His Messenger will be crumbled
to dust, as were those before them:
for we have already sent down
Clear Signs and the Unbelievers will
have a humiliating Penalty

Those who resist Allah and His
"Messenger" obviously refers to anyone
who is not a Muslim. Therefore
every Non-Muslim must be crushed to
death by the holy edict of Allah.
No doubt it was this very verse which
must have served as a motivation
for those pious Muslims who bombed
the World Trade Center. Allah must
have been extremely pleased to watch
all those innocent Non-Muslims
being crumbled/cushed to death.

[Koran 44:43-50] Verily the Tree of
Zaqqum will be the food of the sinful.
Like molten brass it will boil in their
insides, Like the boiling of
scalding water Seize Ye Him and
drag him into the midst of the blazing
Fire Then pour over his head the
penalty of Boiling Water

[Koran 2:39] Those who reject faith
(Islam) and belie our signs, They
shall be Companions of the Fire
and abide in it.

[Koran 2:89-90] The Curse of Allah
is on those without faith (in Islam)
Thus have they drawn wrath upon
wrath on themselves and humiliating
is the punishment of those who
reject faith (Islam)

[Koran 5:33] The Punishment for those
who oppose Allah and his messenger
is: Execution or Crucifixion or
the cutting off of hands and feet
from opposite sides or exile from the land

[Koran 9:35] On the day when Heat
will be produced out of the wealth in
the Fire of Hell, and with it will be
branded their foreheads, their
sides and their backs- "This is
the treasure that ye buried for
yourselves, taste ye then the
treasures that ye buried."

If you do happen to pick up that
copy of the Koran as I mentioned,
don't expect your fate to improve,
unless you become a Muslim. Allah
doesn't want Non-believers to
understand the Koran. This is quite
understandable on Allah's part,
because any self-respecting human
being who reads the Koran will
be revolted at the violence and
sadism espoused in it. Is it any
wonder that Muslims don't want
Non-Muslims to read or discuss
any part of the Koran? They are
afraid, that anyone who reads it
will soon realise the true nature
of Islam, which is genocide
sanctioned by religion. Here
Allah explains that Non-Muslims
will never be "allowed" to understand
the Koran:

[Koran 17:46-47] And we put coverings
over their hearts and minds, lest
they should understand the Koran,
and we put deafness in their ears;
when you commemorate your Lord
(Allah) and Him alone in the Koran

[Mohammed expects Muslims to read
from the Koran and that some non-Muslims
may over-hear the Muslim "prayers" but
he tells his soldiers not to worry about it]

If a Non-Muslim cannot understand
the Koran, how is he/she expected
to convert to Islam on their own
accord? This is obviously an admission
on Allah's part that people can be
converted to Islam only by violent
force, because he has ensured that
they cannot understand it via reading
the Koran. For any Non-Muslim to
understand the Koran would be absolutely
counterproductive to Islam. Muslims
have hidden the truth from Non-Muslims
for ages. It is a fact that the available
English translations of the Koran do not
contain many of the original Arabic Verses.
Many particular verses were edited and
changed by Muslims, because they were just
"too violent" and explicitly revealed
the brutal and barbaric nature of Islam.

The Koran is a psychological manual
that incites hatred and violence in
the reader. It was specifically designed
for this very purpose, so that the Prophet
Mohammed could carry on his tradition
of Genocide and Terrorism, long after his
death. The entire recorded history of Muslims
is a testament to this fact.

Note: The Meaning of the Holy Quran
by Abdullah Yusuf Ali has been
used to compose this article. From:


> You are stupid!

Yes, I am that. And embarrassingly asocial too.
And impatient with all my fellow stupid monkeys.
And always eager to enlighten them. Therefore,
let me assure you:

Evil has never gone away on its own. Unconfronted,
Islam will continue to spew terrorism and genocide
into a world unwilling and/or unable to face up to
Islam's insidious and unrepentant evil. Civilization
is whistling past [its] grave when it pretends that
Islam is a religion like the other (real) religions.

But think: The thing about religious fanatics is that

All anybody has to do is but read THOSE TEXTS and
he/she will know what Hamas and Iran are planning
to do... step by step by step by step: They CAN NOT
subvert in the slightest the plan laid down in/as their
religious texts: Learn the texts and you have learned
their plan. And then you will be invulnerable to the
lies THE TEXT commands Muslims to tell non-Muslims
and the stratagems they are allowed and not allowed
to follow in their compliance with their plans' deadly
demands. And, before it's tooo late.

S D Rodrian

All religions are local.
Only science is universal.

Other quotes:

> Annie Besant in 'The Life and Teachings
> of Mohammad,' Madras, 1932.
> It is impossible for anyone who
> studies the life and character of the
> great Prophet of Arabia, who knew
> how he taught and how he lived, to
> feel anything but reverence for
> that mighty Prophet, one of the great
> messengers of the Supreme. And
> although in what I put to you I shall
> say many things which may be
> familiar to many, yet I myself feel,
> whenever I reread them, a new
> way of admiration, a new sense of
> reverence for that mighty Arabian
> teacher.

I wonder what Anne would have
said of these works by the "great
Prophet of Arabia" ....

1. Lets start with the "great" Mohammed
himself, the founder of this
"fabulous" faith. Mohammed was married
to Khadija Bibi, his employer
and 15 years his senior. At that time
Mohammed was 25 years old. He
was Khadija Bibi's third husband.
Khadija Bibi was a widow when she
married Mohammed. For the first time
in his life, Mohammed enjoyed
a luxurious life.

This shows the parasitic nature of
Mohammed who married his employer
so that he can live a rich life without
putting in a single day's work.

2. Khadija Bibi died when Mohammed
was 49 years old. Between the ages
of 49 and 63 the "great prophet"
married at least 11 times.

This shows how he treated the
institution of marriage. For him, women
were nothing but objects for sexual
fulfillment. Marrying at least
11 women in 14 years throws light
on his insatiable sexual appetite.
Read on about the "greatness" of
this prophet.

3. Mohammed's favourite wife was
Ayesha Bibi who was 6 years old when
she was married to him.

Marrying a 6 year old baby clearly shows
that Mohammed was not only
a womanizer but also a child molester.

4. Mohammed's adopted son Zayed was
married to Zainab, daughter of
Jahsh. But one day the prophet "beheld
in a loose undress, the beauty
of Zainab, and burst forth into an
ejaculation of devotion and desire.
The servile, or greatful, freeman
(Zayed) understood the hint and
yielded without hesitation to the
love of the benefactor."

Mohammed was not satisfied with
his own overflowing harem and had to
marry his son's wife. His son being
a devoted follower of the "great"
prophet was more than happy to
divorce his wife. What a great father-
in-law Mohammed was, a model
for all Islamic father-in-laws!

Mohammed preached what he
practised. This is supported by the
following verses from Quran and Hadiths.

Quotes from the "Holy" Quran on Women

[II/223:] Your women are a tilth
for you (to cultivate). So go to
your tilth as ye will...

[IV/34:] Men are in charge of women,
because Allah hath made the one
of them to excel the other.. As for
those from whom ye fear rebellion,
admonish them and banish them
to beds apart, and scourge them.

[IV/15:] (For women) If any one of
your women is guilty of lewdness
...confine them until death claims them.

[IV/16:] (For Men) If two men among
you commit indecency (sodomy) punish
them both. If they repent and mend
their ways, let them be. Allah
is forgiving and merciful.

As you can see, for women any sort
of sexual exploration is punishable
by death. Whereas for a man, any
form of perversion is pardoned by
the all merciful Allah.

[XXIV/6-7:] As for those who accuse
their wives but have no witnesses
except themselves , let the testimony
of one of them be four testimonies


If a woman's conduct is mischievous
or immodest, the husband has the right
to beat her up but must not break
her bones. She must not allow anybody
to enter the house if her husband
does not like him. She has the right
to expect sustenance of her husband.
(TR. P 439)

It is forbidden for a woman to be
seen by any man except her husband
when she is made up or well-dressed.
(TR. P 430)

Majority of women would go to hell.
(Muslim P 1431)

> --------------------------------------------

> K. S. Ramakrishna Rao in 'Mohammed:
> The Prophet of Islam,' 1989
> My problem to write this monograph
> is easier, because we are not
> generally fed now on that (distorted)
> kind of history and much time
> need not be spent on pointing out
> our misrepresentations of Islam. The
> theory of Islam and sword, for
> instance, is not heard now in any
> quarter worth the name. The
> principle of Islam that there is no
> compulsion in religion is well known.

Rao must have lived in some other
dimension (I would
probably propose the Bizarro dimension.)

> ---------------------------------------------------
> James Michener in Islam:
> The Misunderstood Religion
> Reader's Digest, May 1955, pp. 68-70.
> "No other religion in history spread
> so rapidly as Islam. The West has
> widely believed that this surge of
> religion was made possible by the
> sword. But no modern scholar
> accepts this idea, and the Quran
> is explicit in the support of the
> freedom of conscience."

Probably the millions of Indians who
once were Hindus and were
butchered all committed suicide
and blamed it on the Muslims.
The Armenians who were butched
by the Muslim Turks were probably
suicides as well (I believe that's
what the Turks say to this day).

> "Muhammad, the inspired man
> who founded Islam, was born about A.D. 570
> into an Arabian tribe that worshiped idols.
> Orphaned at birth, he was
> always particularly solicitous of the
> poor and needy, the widow and
> the orphan, the slave and the
> downtrodden. At twenty he was already a
> successful businessman, and soon
> became director of camel caravans for
> a wealthy widow. When he reached
> twenty-five his employer recognizing
> his merit, proposed marriage. Even
> though she was fifteen years older,
> he married her and as long as she
> lived remained a devoted husband."

Listen to this astonishing spin and
then read the naked facts of
Muhammad's life! I mean, these people
have no shame what so ever!

Continuing to quote these disgusting lies
is beyond my patience.
Rather, simply read for yourself the words
of the Koran and judge:

Mohammed knew that sex would sell
very well among the group of his
lecherous followers who were motivated
to fight battles by the
promise of sex slaves and booty. By
constantly emphasizing to his
followers that they would get untouched
virgins in Paradise, Mohammed
is clearly expressing his "high"
opinion of the institution of marriage
and his fairness to women. Once
the followers go to heaven, they can
conveniently ditch their wives for
the fresher and more pleasurable
sexual encounters with 'Houris'
(beautiful virgins). Not only that,
the poor wives who gave up their
virginity for the pleasure of their
husbands do not get even one Male
Sex Bomb. But wait, Allah is all
merciful! He gives the wives the rare
honour of watching their husbands
deflower those 72 Houris (virgins)
and 28 young pre-pubescent boys.

The relevant verses from the Koran are:

[Koran 78:31] As for the righteous,
they shall surely triumph. Theirs
shall be gardens and vineyards, and
high-bosomed virgins for
companions: a truly overflowing cup.

[Koran 37:40-48] ...They will sit with
bashful, dark-eyed virgins, as
chaste as the sheltered eggs of ostriches.

[Koran 44:51-55] ...Yes and We shall wed
them to dark-eyed houris.
(beautiful virgins)

[Koran 52:17-20] ...They shall recline
on couches ranged in rows. To
dark-eyed houris (virgins) we shall wed them...

[Koran 55:56-57] In them will be bashful
virgins neither man nor Jinn
will have touched before.Then which of
the favours of your Lord will you deny ?"

In the Hadiths, Mohammed goes
one step further and expands the
promise of virgins to include a free
sex market where there is no
limit of the number of sexual partners.
Women and young boys are on
display as if in a fruit market where
you can choose the desired ripeness.

[Quote from Hadiths
Al Hadis, Vol. 4, p. 172, No. 34]
Ali reported that the Apostle of
Allah said, "There is in Paradise
a market wherein there will be
no buying or selling, but will consist
of men and women. When a man
desires a beauty, he will have
intercourse with them."

[YOUNG BOYS] Homosexuality was
and is widely practised in Islamic
conutries. To please the homosexuals
among his followers he promised
them pre-pubescent boys in Paradise.
So after committing plunder, loot,
rape and murder in this life, the
followers of Islam get "rewarded"
by untouched virginal youths
who are fresh like pearls.

The relevant verses from the Koran are:

[Koran 52:24] Round about them will
serve, to them, boys (handsome)
as pearls well-guarded.

[Koran 56:17] Round about them will
serve boys of perpetual freshness.

[Koran 76:19] And round about them
will serve boys of perpetual
freshness: if thou seest them, thou
wouldst think them scattered pearls.

WINE Mohammed had to find more
selling points besides virgins, young
boys and plenty of water. What
good would be of Paradise without
rivers of wine for his followers?
Wine was an extremely precious
commodity in the dry deserts of
Arabia where it was rare to find
vineyards. Mohammed had a problem
here: he had to include wine in
his 'Paradise-Package' but how could
he include it in the list when
Allah had declared intoxicants as
sinful. The only way to do this
was to somehow claim that the wine
in the promised Paradise was not
intoxicating and therefore not sinful.
Never mind the fact that wine
by nature contains alcohol which is

The relevant verses from the Koran are:

[Koran 47:15] Here is a Parable of the
Garden which the righteous are
promised. In it are...rivers of wine...

[Koran 37:40-48] But the true servants
of God shall be well provided for,
...they shall be served with goblet
filled at a gushing fountain, white
and delicious to those who drink it.
It will neither dull their senses
nor befuddle them.

[Koran 56:7-40] They shall recline on
jewelled couches face to face, and
there shalt wait on them immortal youths
with bowls and ewers and a
cup of purest wine:

[Koran 83:23-26] The righteous will
surely dwell in bliss. Reclining upon
soft couches they will gaze around
them: and in their faces you shall
mark the glow of joy. They shall be
given a pure wine to drink,
securely sealed, whose very dregs
are musk...


Start out with much more relevant quotes:
John Quincy Adams on Islam: "The precept
of the Koran is perpetual war against all who
deny that Mahomet is the prophet of God.
The vanquished may purchase their lives by
the payment of tribute; the victorious may
be appeased by a false and delusive promise
of peace; and the faithful follower of the
prophet may submit to the imperious
necessities of defeat: but the command to
propagate the Moslem creed by the sword
is always obligatory when it can be made
effective. The commands of the prophet may
be performed alike by fraud or by force."

"In the seventh century of the Christian era,
a wandering Arab of the lineage of Hagar
[i.e., Muhammad], the Egyptian, combining
the powers of transcendent genius, with the
preternatural energy of a fanatic, and the
fraudulent spirit of an impostor, proclaimed
himself as a messenger from Heaven, and
spread desolation and delusion over an
extensive portion of the earth. Adopting from
the sublime conception of the Mosaic law,
the doctrine of one omnipotent God; he
connected indissolubly with it, the audacious
falsehood, that he was himself his prophet
and apostle. Adopting from the new Revelation
of Jesus, the faith and hope of immortal life,
and of future retribution, he humbled it to the
dust by adapting all the rewards and sanctions
of his religion to the gratification of the sexual
passion. He poisoned the sources of human
felicity at the fountain, by degrading the
condition of the female sex, and the allowance
of polygamy; and he declared undistinguishing
and exterminating war, as a part of his religion,
against all the rest of mankind."

(Adams's capital letters). Between these two
religions, thus contrasted in their characters,
a war of twelve hundred years has already
raged. The war is yet flagrant. While the
merciless and dissolute dogmas of the false
prophet shall furnish motives to human action,
there can never be peace upon earth, and
goodwill towards men."

Alexis de Tocqueville on Islam: "I studied
the Koran a great deal. I came away from
that study with the conviction that by and
large there have been few religions in the
world as deadly to men as that of Muhammad.
As far as I can see, it is the principal cause
of the decadence so visible today in the
Muslim world, and, though less absurd than
the polytheism of old, its social and political
tendencies are in my opinion infinitely more
to be feared, and I therefore regard it as a
form of decadence rather than a form of
progress in relation to paganism itself."

Benedict XVI on Islam: "Islam has a total
organization of life that is completely different
from ours; it embraces simply everything.
There is a very marked subordination of woman
to man; there is a very tightly knit criminal law,
indeed, a law regulating all areas of life, that is
opposed to our modern ideas about society.
One has to have a clear understanding that it is
not simply a denomination that can be included
in the free realm of a pluralistic society."

Patriarch Cyrus of Alexandria on Islam: "I
am afraid that God has sent these men to
lay waste the world."

Gregory Palamus of Thessalonica on Islam:
"For these impious people, hated by God
and infamous, boast of having got the better
of the Romans by their love of God ... they
live by the bow, the sword and debauchery,
finding pleasure in taking slaves, devoting
themselves to murder, pillage, spoil and
not only do they commit these crimes, but
even (what an aberration) they believe
that God approves of them. This is what
I think of them, now that I know precisely
about their way of life."

Lord Tebbit on Islam: "The Muslim
religion is so unreformed since it was
created that nowhere in the Muslim
world has there been any real advance
in science, or art or literature, or
technology in the last 500 years."

Andre Servier on Islam: "Islam was not
a torch, as has been claimed, but an
extinguisher. Conceived in a barbarous
brain for the use of a barbarous people,
it was and it remains incapable of
adapting itself to civilization. Wherever
it has dominated, it has broken the
impulse towards progress and checked
the evolution of society."

Theodore Roosevelt on Islam: "The Greeks
who triumphed at Marathon and Salamis
did a work without which the world would
have been deprived of the social value of
Plato and Aristotle, of Aeschylus, Herodotus,
and Thucydides. The civilization of Europe,
America, and Australia exists today at all
only because of the victories of civilized man
over the enemies of civilization, because
the victories stretching through the centuries
from the days of Miltiades and Themistocles
to those of Charles Martel in the eighth
century and those of John Sobieski in the
seventeenth century."

"During the thousand years that included
the careers of the Frankish soldier and the
Polish king, the Christians of Asia and
Africa proved unable to wage successful
war with the Moslem conquerors; and in
consequence Christianity practically
vanished from the two continents; and
today nobody can find in them any 'social
values' whatever, in the sense in which
we use the words, so far as the sphere
of Mohammedan influence. There are such
'social values' today in Europe, America,
and Australia only because during those
thousand years the Christians of Europe
possessed the warlike power to do what
the Christians of Asia and Africa had
failed to do, that is, to beat back the
Moslem invader."

Richard Dawkins on Islam: "Islam deserves
criticism on account of the logical consequences
of its dogma, namely, that the murder of fellow
human beings is to be rewarded with sensual
pleasure in a hedonistic 'Paradise.' A concept
born in the fantasies of an Arab rebel some
fourteen centuries ago. The religion of
Mohammed is a dangerous system when the
teachings and example of the 'prophet' are
believed and followed."

Sam Harris on Islam: "Islam, more than any
other religion human beings have devised, has
all the makings of a thoroughgoing cult of death.
As a matter of doctrine, the Muslim conception
of tolerance is one in which non-Muslims have
been politically and economically subdued,
converted, or put to sword. The penalty for
apostasy is death. We would do well to linger
over this fact for a moment, because it is the
black pearl of intolerance that no liberal exegesis
will ever fully digest.

There are other ideologies with which to expunge
the last vapors of reasonableness from a society's
discourse, but Islam is undoubtedly one of the
best we've got. The truth that we must finally
confront is that Islam contains specific notions
of martyrdom and jihad that fully explain the
character of Muslim violence.

William Eaton on Islam: "Considered as a nation,
they are deplorably wretched, because they have
no property in the soil to inspire an ambition to
cultivate it. They are abject slaves to the
despotism of their government, and they are
humiliated by tyranny, the worst of all tyrannies,
the despotism of priestcraft. They live in more
solemn fear of the frowns of a bigot who has
been dead and rotten above a thousand years
than of the living despot whose frown would
cost them their lives. The ignorance, superstitious
tradition and civil and religious tyranny, which
depress the human mind here, exclude
improvement of every kind."

John Wesley on Islam: "Ever since the
religion of Islam appeared in the world,
the espousers of it have been as wolves
and tigers to all other nations, rending
and tearing all that fell into their merciless
paws, and grinding them with their iron
teeth; that numberless cities are raised
from the foundation, and only their name
remaining; that many countries, which
were once as the garden of God, are now
a desolate wilderness; and that so many
once numerous and powerful nations are
vanished from the earth! Such was, and is
at this day, the rage, the fury, the revenge,
of these destroyers of human kind."


From The New York Times' THE
JIHAD FILES published March 18, 2002

... One document (from al-Qaida
training manuals discovered in
Afghanistan) began with an explanation
of the instructor's goals:

"God Almighty has ordered us to
terrorize his enemies," it reads. "In
compliance with God's order and his
Prophet's order, in an attempt to get
out of the humiliation in which we
have found ourselves, we shall propose
to those who are keen on justice,
fighting against those who oppose them
and those who diminish them until they
receive fresh orders from God. To those
alone, we present: `Rudimentary Methods
in the Manufacturing of Explosive Materials
Effective for Demolition Purposes.' "

This is quite true, and
NOT a "lie" by Islamic
fundamentalists, since the
Koran does specifically say
as much. And which, if you
were smart, you'd

There is no need to go to any mosque. The Koran is
available everywhere/all over the Internet now.

But I advise you to take a closer look at Islam
for yourself, using your own mind... impartially,
as I did. (I too was once content to believe the
crap Muslims AND their Western stooges like
to feed the world.)

The tools to do this are also everywhere available
on the internet:


Perhaps the knowledge will make you a good Christian.
And if you're now a Muslim: Hope no one murders you
simply because you are curious about THE TRUTH (and
I really mean that). Good look, [sic]

S D Rodrian

All religions are local.
Only science is universal.

On Mar 27, 11:37 am, "landyman_alby"

> SDR wrote:

> "every Non-Muslim must be crushed
> to death by the holy edict
> of Allah."

>> In the cities of the nations the
>> LORD your God is giving you as
>> an inheritance, do not leave alive
>> anything that breathes.
>> (Deut. 20:16)

>> What book does this "holy edict" come from?

Hello! It comes from a book no longer taken
seriously (self-evidently, since there are
many Christians and Muslins "breathing"
in the lands the LORD gave the Jews
as their inheritance).

On the other hand, non-Muslims are not
faring as well on the lands conquered by
the Muslims' sword (there is but ONE Jew
left in Afghanistan, and most of the Jews
once "barely breathing" among the Arabs
are now living in Israel--thank you--You
know: that part of The Lord's Inheritance
for the Jewish people which said Jewish
People have managed to pry from the satanic
Muslim squatters that moved in after the
Romans killed the rightful inheritors of God).

Madam (or weird sir), your implied contention
that the fact that somebody else has done evil
in the world justifies/exculpates the evil that
you do is merely a reflection of your very great
wickedness and utter lack of principles.

In other words: Madam, thou art a reprobate!

S D Rodrian

All religions are local.
Only science is universal.

from REUTERS March 30, 2007 ...

UN Rights Body Condemns "Defamation" of Religion

GENEVA (Reuters) - The United Nations top
human rights body condemned "defamation''
of religion on Friday and, in an apparent
reference to the storm over the Prophet cartoons,
said press freedom had its limits.

With the support of China, Russia and Cuba,
Moslem and Arab states comfortably won
a vote on the 47-state "Human Rights" Council
to express concern at "negative stereotyping''
of religions and "attempts to identify Islam
with terrorism.'' [Amaizing stuff! --SDR]

"The resolution is tabled in the expectation
that it will compel the international community
to acknowledge and address "the disturbing
phenomena" of the defamation of religions,
especially Islam,'' said Pakistan, speaking on
behalf of the Organization of the Islamic

The resolution was opposed by Western
states which said it focused too much on
Islam. The job of the Council was to deal
with the rights of individuals not religions,
they said.

"The European Union does not see the
concept of defamation of religion as a valid
one in a human rights discourse,'' a
spokeswoman for the delegation of
Germany, which holds the EU presidency,
told the Council.

The resolution urged countries to ensure
their laws gave adequate protection against
acts of "hatred, discrimination, intimidation
and coercion resulting from defamation of

While everybody had the right to freedom
of expression, this should be exercised
according to limitations of the law and
respect for others, including respect for
religions and beliefs, it said.

In 2006, violent protests rocked cities
from Morocco to Malaysia over Danish
cartoons of Islam's Prophet Mohammad
published in September 2005, which
Muslims regarded as sacrilegious and
an attack on their beliefs.

The vote was 24 countries in favor of the
resolution, 14 against and with 9 abstentions.

GO TO before it's too late.

There you will find all you need to know about
the Evil that is Islam, both historically and in
the modern world. And you won't have to wrack
your brain over why GOD should command war,
death, torture, and rape, genocide, and terror
against human beings (as Mohammed said He did).

Muslims are today engaged in a great battle
throughout the West (to try to extinguish
freedom of expression/freedom of the press)
specifically designed to keep YOU from having
access to the relevant deadly facts about Islam.
Some skirmishes they have lost, but some other
skirmishes they have definitely won (as shown in
the --March 30, 2007-- Reuters report above).

But make no mistake about this: their aim is above
all to stifle YOUR right to hold an open debate on
the merits/demerits of Islam because they KNOW
they can not win such a debate. The bastards will
claim an article like this one as "an example of the
defamation of Islam" TO WESTERNERS ... but they
will NEVER print this article in any Muslim country's
newspaper to show their own peoples an example of
such a "defamation" because an article like this one
would inform ordinary Muslims on the true nature
of Islam (if it were lies they would be only too eager
to print it everywhere). And Muslim populations are
all kept horrifically ill informed on the true historical
and moral vileness that is Islam: Evil depends on lies.
And they all know that Islam can not survive the light
of TRUTH being turned on it--from ANY direction.

It shall be most interesting to see whether human
civilization survives or is eventually subsumed and
destroyed as thoroughly as all those once great
and mighty civilizations which once thrived (where
now only the devastation in which most Muslims
live exists). Compare the wealthy Taiwanese [who
beggared by the Chinese Civil War went on to
populate not much more than a barren ocean rock
but today have made it into a paradise of progress,
prosperity... even modern-day democracy out of
the inevitable dictatorship that was once the direct
result of that terrible civil war--even China itself will
develop into such a democracy long before ANY
Muslim-majority state, I'll wager], compare them
with the many & many beggar peoples of the
world's Muslim-majority countries cursed by Islam.

I suspect it shall come down to whether we insist
that the truth is infinitely more important than any
hurt feelings, or we permit lies to go unchallenged
just to spare the liars.

S D Rodrian

All religions are local.
Only science is universal.

In a article, "The Spell
of Islamophobia" Eboo Patel wrote:

> I spoke about how Muslim history and
> theology support religious pluralism.

Yes? This may help explain why it is that
Islamic cultures (all of which started out
from pluralistic non-Islamic civilizations)
are everywhere today a monolithic Islamic
mind-control culture where even the mere
expression of a possible change of religion
is instantly punished by death (and where
children are encouraged to murder their
parents, brothers, and sisters ... and it is
demanded of parents they murder their
children if they stray from Islamic law).

Today only a few Christian souls remain of
what was an Egypt which was once all Christian.
The last few surviving Christians are even now
leaving Iran and Iraq. In the East, where Islam
has but only recently taken over countries like
Indonesia, Thailand, and the like... and in Africa
the old civilizations there are in abeyance and
steady retreat under the unrelenting violence
and intimidation of Islam--so too there soon you
will see nothing but the soulless mind-control
slavery you see everywhere in the Islamic world.


Look into the history of the Islamic Plague
which has devastated a third of humanity.
The answer is in history, not in articles by
Muslim propagandists like Eboo Patel & others.


You can begin from there, and Google your way
to the truth, maybe even before it's too late.

S D Rodrian

All religions are local.
Only science is universal.

Islam Under Scrutiny by Ex-Muslims

Islam, the Multicultural Cemetery --
An Open Letter to an Educated Liberal
by Alexander Maistrovoy 09 Jul, 2007

   "And for the first time, with a sudden shiver,
   came the clear knowledge of what the meat
   I had seen in the Underworld might be. These
   careless Eloi were mere fatted cattle, which
   the ant-like Morlocks preserved and preyed
   upon." "The Time Machine" of H G Wells

My dear brainy friend!

The communist slogan in the former Soviet
Union was: "We say Lenin, we mean the Party,
we say the Party, we mean Lenin". For you it
could sound like this: "We say multiculturalism,
we mean Islam, we say Islam, we mean
multiculturalism". The Muslim world is the last
and sole barrier on the way to your dream
about cultural pluralistic society. "Even a
Spaniard can be French.* An Arab cannot
be." In despair you are ready to fasten on a
kaffiyeh on yourself and a yashmak on your
wife in order to drag a Muslim into your Cloud

   * "To be French today means not only to be
   ethnically French, but also Italian, Vietnamese,
   Chinese, Jew, Arab, Spanish..." (F. Mitterrand)

It's your fixed idea, your choice. I will only
remind you, my starry-eyed friend, what the
role of a "true believer" is in the multicultural
society, whether he comes there invited or
uninvited. For hundreds of years the Middle
East was the embodiment of the real
multicultural ideal, the thesaurus of spiritual
and philosophical knowledge. Antique mystery
religions and Zoroastrism; the Ebonites and
the first Christian sects; Gnosticism and
Kabbalistic teachings; the Neoplatonics and
the Manichees, the Arians and the Nestorians"
all of them had co-existed in harmony. They
conveyed their ideas and views of the world
from one to another in this gigantic melting-pot
of human spirit. Whether you know about it or
not, it was from this fathomless source, that
European philosophy, theology and learning
got strength which paved the way to freedom
and liberal values.

One of the first acts of triumphant Islam was
the burning of the famous Alexandrine library.*
But it was only the beginning, because at that
time Islam was relatively tolerant and noble.
And what is more, it joined this melting-pot (so,
my dear friend, don't accuse me of jaundice).
Islam showed the world the mysticism of Sufis
with their poetry of Life and extenuation of
material benefits, expressed in Druze religion.
Much later, the most humanistic religion of
the present times (the Baha¡ Faith) arose
from Islam. It also gave birth to Ahmadiyya
movement, which believed in the improvement
of the world through love. Unfortunately,
obsession and obscurantism intensified. First,
Sunni in Saudi Arabia found themselves under
the dogmatic and obscure Wahhabite rule,
then Salafies and Muslim brothers appeared.
Formerly latent Utopias in Shi'a Islam turned
into paranoia before our eyes.

* This "library" was burnt and re-built several
   times: It was reportedly first burnt down by or
   at the time of Caesar (48 BC). Rebuilt by Marc
   Anthony, it may have been destroyed in the
   Emperor Aurelian's sack of the city (270-275).
   In 391, Christian Emperor Theodosius I ordered
   the destruction of pagan temples, and as the
   "library" was such, it was destroyed by bishop
   Theophilus of Alexandria. Finally, a Muslim army
   led by Amr ibn al Aas sacked the city in 642 AD.
   Infamously, the general asked the Caliph Umar
   what to do with the library, and received the
   legendary reply, "If what is written in them (the
   library books) agrees with the Koran, they are
   not required; and if they disagree, they are not
   desired. Therefore: Destroy them all." True or
   not, this legendary principium has pretty much
   encapsulated the Islamic attitude towards all
   aspects of humanity not considered by the Islamic
   holy texts across the length & breadth of Islamic
   history... and explains the dearth of progress/
   backwardness/ignorance which has gripped the
   Muslims for well over a thousand years now. SDR

Even in the time of medieval inquisition in
Europe fresh ideas existed. There were different
philosophic schools: from Albert the Great to
Thomas Aquinas to Meister Eckhart to Roger
Bacon. There was Italian Proto-Renaissance
with Dante Alighieri, Giovanni Pisano and Giotto.
There was craving for freedom, personified in
the Katars, Waldenses, Czech Hussites, and
Lollards. And now tell me, my clever friend,
what kinds of philosophic, spiritual schools do
you know in the modern Islamic world?
Enlighten me, I will be happy! There are few
courageous people, who denounce dogmatic
Wahhabites, like Sheikh Abdul Hadi Palazzi
and Dr. Taufik Hamid from Egypt. But they
are social outcasts of the Muslim world and
they live beyond the bounds of it.

Let me ask you: what has remained from the
multicultural world of the Middle East? Do the
Zoroastrians and Baha¡s stay in Iran, their
homeland? It will be easer to find them in a
cemetery in that country, than living. Those
who could escape flew to India and the West.
Had the Sufis remained in Saudi Arabia? No,
they were annihilated by the regime as the
enemies of "true Islam". Can you find a
branch of Ahmadiyya movement at least in
one of the countries of the Middle East?

You can do it only in one place (so hated
by you): Israel (although I make no question
of you being a Jew), the "state-of-racism-
apartheid-and-coercion". Their centre is in
Haifa. So is the famous Baha¡ sanctuary.
The Sufis are free in Israel, and the Druzes
are enjoying full civic rights in Israel.

Not long ago the Arabian East was a palette
of ancient and unique Christian sects. Waves
of Islamic fanaticism swept away all of them.
The Christians of Iraq and the West Bank
escaped to the USA and Canada. Copts left
Egypt. It may happen to the Maronites in
Lebanon: the country is on the verge of the
"Green revolt". Iraqi Gnostics-Mandaeans
are exposed to genocide and on the verge
of annihilation. Not mentioning about Darfur.
And you don't see it! Because the Mandaeans
are not the beloved Palestinians, who claim
for your special attention! In 20-30 years
the Middle East will turn into a multicultural
cemetery with an oasis in the form of Israel.
If only you, my brainy friend, will not do
your best to help the desert to swallow up
this oasis. But you will, I have no doubts.

One more step, and instead of the cradle of
humanity only a scorched desert of hatred
will be left here. And this desert will spread
to the North and South, to the East and West.
It will enter the open doors of your house;
devour you and your family, your clubs ...
cafes, libraries, theaters, and galleries. You
have got used to freedom; you don't know
what the world without freedom is. I know
it because I have grown up in communist
Moscow. But I also know the Middle East.
And believe me, in comparison to the new
Caliphate the Soviet empire of the 60ies and
70ies would seem a paradise. The new rulers
of the world will not only shut your mouth,
but turn your soul inside out.

I pity you. Though, sorry. Not any longer.

   Alexander Maistrovoy [is a journalist of
   Russian-language newspaper "Novosty
   Nedely" in Israel. He writes about political
   & religious issues.]

"Multiculturalism has come to be understood as
something for immigrants, something devoid of
interest for citizens in general or for their country."
and "If the most pampered, the best and the
brightest, of European Islam are turning against
European culture and democracy, then multicultural
policies as they have been carried out for a
generation are at a dead end." Therefore, because
of the above and many other reasons ...
"multiculturalism is not working." THE WEST'S
LAST CHANCE by Tony Blankley p. 87,92,93,189.

Muslims Nations: Defame Islam, Get Sued?
A.P. Mar 14, 6:26 PM (ET) By R. Callimachi

DAKAR, Senegal (AP) - The Muslim world has
created a battle plan to defend its religion from
political cartoonists and "bigots." Concerned about
what they see as a rise in the defamation of Islam,
leaders of the world's Muslim nations are
considering taking legal action against those that
slight their religion or its sacred symbols. It was
a key issue during a two-day summit that ended
Friday in this western Africa capital. The Muslim
leaders are attempting to demand redress from
nations like Denmark, which allowed the publication
of cartoons portraying the Prophet Muhammad in
2006 and again last month, to the fury of the
Muslim world. Though the legal measures being
considered have not been spelled out, the idea pits
many Muslims against principles of freedom of
speech enshrined in the constitutions of numerous
Western governments. "I don't think freedom of
expression should mean freedom from blasphemy,"
said Senegal's President Abdoulaye Wade, the
chairman of the 57-member Organization of the
Islamic Conference. "There can be no freedom
without limits."

Delegates were given a voluminous report by the
OIC that recorded anti-Islamic speech and actions
from around the world. The report concludes that
Islam is under attack and that a defense must be
mounted. "Muslims are being targeted by a campaign
of defamation, denigration, stereotyping, intolerance
and discrimination," charged Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu,
the secretary general of the group. The report urges
the creation of a "legal instrument" to crack down
on defamation of Islam. Some delegates point to laws
in Europe criminalizing the denial of the Holocaust
and other anti-Semitic rhetoric. They also point to
articles within various U.N. charters that condemn
discrimination based on religion and argue that these
should be ramped up.

The International Humanist and Ethical Union in
Geneva released a statement accusing the Islamic
states of attempting to limit freedom of expression
and of attempting to misuse the U.N. Human Rights
Watch said in a statement that objectionable
depictions of the Prophet Muhammad do not "give
them the right under international human rights
law to insist that others abide by their views."

To protect the faith, Muslim nations have created
an "observatory" that meets regularly to monitor
Islamophobia. It examines lectures and workshops
taking place around the world and prints a monthly
record of "offensive content."

"America has a deep respect for the religion of Islam,"
Cumber told The Associated Press. "The freedom of
faith that we exercise, that we enjoy in America,
that is also a very important aspect of the American
core values. Anyone who wants to practice any faith
is never stopped or discouraged."

   I wonder how long that's going to last after
   Sharia becomes America's law-of-the-land?
   The answer is contained in the pages of history.
   I advise you to start reading up. SDR

The terrorists and their protectors
"enki" thoughtfully wrote:
> I also think that Islam and Europe are on a
> collision course. White Europeans mostly don't like
> religion and many countries are morving to atheism
> while those who follow Islam are getting more
> fervent. From what I know about Islam is that it
> perscribes restrictions for life while Europe is
> moving to remove many if not all religous
> restrictions. This cartoon thing is an extention of
> the riots over the summer which is this culture
> clash of incompatible societies.

You will soon see Europe enacting laws to FORCE
Europeans to "show respect" for "religious sanctities."
The European politicos are already talking about this.
So, atheists who scoff at [whatever range/spectrum
of silly superstitions] will find themselves prosecuted
soon as well as just persecuted as per now in Europe.

Can you the average European do anything about this?
I doubt it. Freedom of speech is "a notion" in Europe.
It is not The Law, as in America, where you can still
burn the American flag, say (which a lot of muckers
here think is as sacred an image as Muslims think
Moe is); and where you will continue to burn it with
impunity UNTIL congress changes the LAW which
gives Americans the freedom to express themselves
even that outrageously--something which (changing
the law) congress as tried to do any number of times
without success...yet, in a self-destructive kind of
madness driven on by our muckers.

The future is always uncertain, and Congress may
yet change the nature/character of the American
Experiment to make the United States more like
the Islamic world. But I certainly hope it doesn't
happen any time soon.

As for the Europeans, not even protected by the law:

Good luck, and be sure to always call the police if you
spot a picture of Mohammed (anonymously, of course,
or you will have to explain HOW YOU KNEW IT WAS A
PICTURE OF MOHAMMED)...!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

S D Rodrian

All religions are local.
Only science is universal.

********************************* displaying
his sterling Muslim education hollered:
> First, the deranged mutts inhabiting Israel
> have no historical right
> to the land. They NEVER lived there in times past.
> They are NOT
> Semites who originally and have continually
> inhabited Israel.

Sir, if you believe in God, then you must
believe that God loves his Creation and
would never condone our consideration of
it through lies: The Creator of this world
must want us in every case to contemplate
his Creation through the untrammeled truth:

   Every time you speak a lie about God's
   Creation you spit upon the Face of God.

And Islamic education is essentially the
raising of lies aimed at promoting even
greater lies still. This is an inescapable
and eternal fact whose proofs are as
impossible to avoid as the light of day:
You have but to look for it. It is only
through a Western secular education
that one can acquire the truth, because
only such an education seeks to follow
the truth WHERE EVER it may lead us.

Islamic "education" always seeks to mold
the truth to the ways of Mohammed--and
he was one of history's most unimaginably
immoral & unethical criminals, if not the
worst: Therefore it is only to be expected
that EVERYTHING in the Islamic curriculum
ought to be (as it is) a vile corruption and
violation of the truth.

Here follows for you a little unbiased
education that follows after the truth,
where ever it leads us:

From The New York Times »

Studies Show Jews’ Genetic Similarity
Published: June 9, 2010

Jewish communities in Europe and the
Middle East share many genes inherited
from the ancestral Jewish population
that lived in the Middle East some 3,000
years ago, even though each community
also carries genes from other sources
— usually the country in which it lives.

That is the conclusion of two new genetic
surveys, the first to use genome-wide
scanning devices to compare many Jewish
communities around the world.

A major surprise from both surveys is the
genetic closeness of the two Jewish
communities of Europe, the Ashkenazim
and the Sephardim. The Ashkenazim thrived
in Northern and Eastern Europe until their
devastation by the Hitler regime, and now
live mostly in the United States and Israel.
The Sephardim were exiled from Spain in
1492 and from Portugal in 1497 and
moved to the Ottoman Empire, North Africa
and the Netherlands.

The two genome surveys extend earlier
studies based just on the Y chromosome,
the genetic element carried by all men.
They refute the suggestion made last year
by the historian Shlomo Sand in his book
“The Invention of the Jewish People” that
Jews have no common origin but are a
miscellany of people in Europe and Central
Asia who converted to Judaism at various

Jewish communities from Europe, the Middle
East and the Caucasus all have substantial
genetic ancestry that traces back to the Levant;
Ethiopian Jews and two Judaic communities
in India are genetically much closer to their
host populations.

The surveys provide rich data about genetic
ancestry that is of great interest to historians.
“I’m constantly impressed by the manner in
which the geneticists keep moving ahead with
new projects and illuminating what we know
of history,” said Lawrence H. Schiffman, a
professor of Judaic studies at New York University.

One of the surveys was conducted by Gil
Atzmon of the Albert Einstein College of
Medicine and Harry Ostrer of New York
University and appears in the current American
Journal of Human Genetics. The other, led by
Doron M. Behar of the Rambam Health Care
Campus in Haifa and Richard Villems of the
University of Tartu in Estonia, is published
in Thursday’s edition of Nature.

Dr. Atzmon and Dr. Ostrer have developed
a way of timing demographic events from
the genetic elements shared by different
Jewish communities. Their calculations show
that Iraqi and Iranian Jews separated from
other Jewish communities about 2,500
years ago. This genetic finding presumably
reflects a historical event, the destruction
of the First Temple at Jerusalem by
Nebuchadnezzar in 587 B.C. and the exile
of many Jews there to his capital at Babylon.

The shared genetic elements suggest that
members of any Jewish community are related
to one another as closely as are fourth or fifth
cousins in a large population, which is about
10 times higher than the relationship between
two people chosen at random off the streets
of New York City, Dr. Atzmon said.

Ashkenazic and Sephardic Jews have roughly
30 percent European ancestry, with most of
the rest from the Middle East, the two
surveys find. The two communities seem very
similar to each other genetically, which is
unexpected because they have been separated
for so long.

One explanation is that they come from the
same Jewish source population in Europe.
The Atzmon-Ostrer team found that the genomic
signature of Ashkenazim and Sephardim was
very similar to that of Italian Jews, suggesting
that an ancient population in northern Italy
of Jews intermarried with Italians could have
been the common origin. The Ashkenazim
first appear in Northern Europe around
A.D. 800, but historians suspect that they
arrived there from Italy.

Another explanation, which may be
complementary to the first, is that there was
far more interchange and intermarriage than
expected between the two communities in
medieval times.

The genetics confirms a trend noticed by
historians: that there was more contact
between Ashkenazim and Sephardim than
suspected, with Italy as the linchpin of
interchange, said Aron Rodrigue, a Stanford
University historian.

A common surname among Italian Jews is
Morpurgo, meaning someone from Marburg
in Germany. Also, Dr. Rodrigue said, one
of the most common names among the
Sephardim who settled in the Ottoman
Empire is Eskenazi, indicating that many
Ashkenazim had joined the Sephardic
community there.

The two genetic surveys indicate “that there
may be common origins shared by the two
groups, but also that there were extensive
contacts and settlements,” Dr. Rodrigue said.

Hebrew could have served as the lingua
franca between the Ashkenazic community,
speaking Yiddish, and the Ladino-speaking
Sephardim. “When Jews met each other,
they spoke Hebrew,” Dr. Schiffman said,
referring to the medieval period.


   "How did Israelis get the bright idea to
   migrate to a piece of land that was already
   occupied by Palestinians and surrounded
   by Arab countries?"

Well, on your level of historical studies
(apparently) there's a marvy movie that
explains it: "The Ten Commandments." It's
the Jewish Torah ... and "your' Bible too.


Is there really such a thing as a Muslim
charity or "peace" organization?...


The infamous Gaza flotilla "Foundation for
Human Rights and Freedoms and Humanitarian
Relief" (Insani Yardim Vakfi), otherwise known
as the IHH's ties to terrorist activities clearly fit
the European Union’s own criteria for immediate
proscription as a terrorist irganization:

In particular the IHH's affiliation with Hamas,
"which is on the EU list of terror organizations,
and its membership in The Union of the Good,
an Islamic umbrella affiliated with the Muslim
Brotherhood." The Union of Good itself was
designated as a terrorist entity by the United
States in 2008.

"According to EU guidelines the definition of
terrorism means individuals, groups and entities
on which there is accurate information proving
that they have committed, are attempting to
commit or are facilitating the commission of
terrorist acts. Terrorist activities include
'directing or participating in the activities of a
terrorist group, including by funding its activities
or supplying material resources.'"

A 2006 report by the Danish Institute for
International Studies stated that during the
1990s the IHH maintained links with al-Qaida
and a number of global jihad networks and
that the Turkish government launched an
investigation into the IHH in 1997 after
receiving intelligence that the IHH had bought
automatic weapons from Islamist terrorists.
The Turkish government raided the organization’s
Istanbul offices, where they found weapons,
explosives, and instructions for bomb-making
and documents linking the IHH to terrorist
activities in Afghanistan, Chechnya, and Bosnia.
In 1996, the CIA identified the IHH as an extreme
radical organization with ties to terror. French
intelligence found that in the mid-1990s IHH
leader B’ulent Yildirim recruited soldiers for jihad
activities in a number of Muslim countries and
that the IHH transferred money, firearms, and
explosives to jihadists in said countries. The
Islamic government of Erdogan ended that probe


Those are the "peace activists" behind the Gaza
flotilla episode.


'Turkish gov't backed extremists'
By YAAKOV LAPPIN 09/06/2010

The IHH operatives maintained close ties
with Erdogan, report says. A report released
this week by the Intelligence and Terrorism
Information Center (ITIC) said new details
have emerged which show how approximately
40 operatives from the Turkish Islamist IHH
organization carefully prepared a violent ambush
on navy commandos last week on board the
Mavi Maramara ship, and acted with the full
backing of the Turkish government. The IHH
operatives were armed with knives, axes and
other weapons, communicated with one another
using walkie talkies, set up a control room
onboard the ship, and maintained close ties
with Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan,
the report said.



   Some idiot wrote: "Existential threat"?
   (posed by Gaza to Israel's existence):
   Why don't we look at the current threat
   to Gaza's existence..."

Well: Perhaps it's too easy for us to sit here
in our Lazy Boys and criticize Israel for
isolating and containing Gaza. It might
help to put the situation in a different
perspective: What would YOU do if a
dangerous maniac were shooting at you
and displayed every intention of chasing
you down until either you or he were dead?

That is the reality Israel faces with regards
to Gaza (what political solution could there
possibly be in such a case?): Gaza will
NEVER stop trying to murder Israelis;
and Israel's choice is starkly inescapable:
either kill Gaza or try to isolate and contain
it. At times I am truly astonished at Israel's
patience and equanimity. But I am even
more taken aback at the comments some
people (who ought to know better) make
concerning the situation between Israel
and Gaza: "Let Gaza kill as many Israelis
as it wants with absolute impunity." - !!

"Let Gaza become the closest militant
Islamist (aka terrorist) missile base to
Europe herself!" It never ceases to amaze
me, because there is no question that the
very same people who would tomorrow
weep tears of blood if Israel lifted the
Gaza blockade and the Hamas terrorists
were free to butcher not merely Israelis
but as many Europeans as their perverted
religion commands them to do at every
possible opportunity... are the same
people who, blinded by their hatred of
Jews, today clamor blindly for Israel to
do just that: place them and their families
in dire/constant peril of being murdered
by implacable religious fanatics!

And, by all means do go ahead, post
your reply: "We're willing to take that
chance!" It is as inevitable as it is tragic.

S D Rodrian

All religions are local.
Only science is universal.


On Israel's prohibiting musical instruments
into Gaza (really because they are deemed
to be luxury items, thus expressly prohibited):


   Islam forbids musical instruments.
   The Gazans being "good Muslims," why
   would they want them?

[Hadith Qudsi 19:5:] "The Prophet said that
Allah commanded him to destroy all the
musical instruments, idols, crosses and all
the trappings of ignorance."

"There will be peoples of my Community
who will hold fornication, silk, wine, and
musical instruments to be lawful" [— 'Umdat
al-Salik r40.0]

"On the Day of Resurrection, Allah will
pour molten lead into the ears of whoever
sits listening to a songstress."

Posted by Dan78

Fundamentalist Islam (aka real Islam, or
Islam that isn't watered down) prohibits
music, just as it prohibits ... well, most
anything that doesn't involve bowing down
on a rug in devotion to Allah.

And guess who's the fundamentalist Islamic
group in town? Hamas.

Guess who popularly elected Hamas to
represent them? The people of Gaza.
What's the problem?

Posted by stegman


The truth of the matter, of course, is that
most so-called Christians have almost zero
idea of what the Bible really says (which is
why most "Christians" think of the Jews as
"the murderers of Jesus" instead of the much
more accurate fact that Jews represent the
very kind of people which gave us Jesus
--there is nothing in Jesus that was not first
in Judaism).

And in the same way most Muslims have
little idea of what the real nature of Islam
really is: Their Islamic practice is a veneer,
thank God, or it would be all-out us or them:

In a Muslim Europe, how long would Bach,
Beethoven, Mozart survive? (The Beatles don't
even come into it, their so-called "music" is
blatant pornography even by the standards
of even the most casually pious Muslims.)
How long would the great museums of the
Western World survive? (What would happen
to the great Churches of the West can be
seen in the Turkish Constantinople, where
the greatest church in Christendom was
first sacked, despoiled, desecrated, turned
into a mosque, and finally reduced to a
tourist attraction...)

Democracy itself is heresy/blasphemy to
Islam, or mind the Turkish "democratic"
government's prime minister Recep Tayyip
Erdogan's casual remark: "Democracy is
like a bus: Once ya get there, ya get off."

    This is what Islamists consider
    the best/only use for democracy.

Good luck & good bye to all Turks' hopes
of a lasting democracy once the Islamists
there grab compete control... which doesn't
look like it's all that far off now, especially
--amazingly-- with Europe's special help!

Worse still: The absolute mind-control that
Islam demands creates blank automatons
who are forever after prevented from even
the most basic maintenance of the affairs
of human civilization. There is almost zero
advance of civilization in Islamic countries
(all innovation there is either stolen or
bought/borrowed from outside the Islamic
world). Once the unquestioned leaders of
the Western World in every sphere of
academic and scientific endeavor, the
so-called "fertile crescent" that runs from
Egypt to Iraq is now but the monstrously
impoverished slum that is the direct result
of conversion to Islam. And that is what
awaits all the world's human civilization
when Islam accomplishes its avowed aim
of either converting or killing humanity.

S D Rodrian

All religions are local.
Only science is universal.


U.N. Security Council Passes New Sanctions
Against Iran--From now on the Iranians are
going to have to make their own Chicklets: Ha!
Take that, you kill-the-world nuke-mongers!

Are the Jews God's Chosen People?

All anybody need do is read the news
to know the Jews are indeed God's
Chosen People: It obviously does not
mean that the Jews are God's most
privileged people, by any means (as
history evidences most horridly). What
it means is that God chose the Jews
for a very special task. And who can
witness the little nation of Israel stand
as almost the sole bulwark in the world
against the overwhelming tide of Islamic
terrorism and still doubt that the Jews
were indeed picked by God for the task
(most important of all) which they are
now carrying out almost solely alone?

Which is not to say I condone Jewish supremist
ideologies in any way, shape, or form (or even
hints at their expression): if there's an even more
objectionable form of racism than that of the so-
called white supremists, Nazis, and their ilk... it
would have to be expressions of racial, or ethnic,
or in some cases even cultural superiority by peoples
who have been the victims of such racism (which is
the case with African Americans, and Jews). Such
expressions are off-hand justifications for the worst
racism of the mainstream racists themselves.

Were it not for the fact that Israel is the
maniatical obsession of the Islamic world
and their Western pawns/stooges... what
evils might not Muslims have carried out
against a totally naive/self-disarmed West!

All one has to do is contemplate in shock
and horror what Islam once did to the self-
disarmed Hindus (the greatest genocide
in all of human history).

Yet Israel stands almost alone in her fight
to stem the tide of Islamic terrorism that
would overwhelm/doom human civilization.

I cry out against the doom that is Islam
even knowing as I do that all species are
"for a while." And that even as the
dinosaurs were obliterated one fine day,
one unsuspected day human civilization
may be halted & reversed until it vanishes
into the dust of prehistory from whence
it arose: That is the mission that is Islam.

A billion human souls are already living
the cultural cataclysm that is Islam, having
descended from the once great heights of
their achieved civilizations to the staggering
slums that today everywhere define the
Islamic world... and have defined it ever
since the advent of Islam--But, after all,
what possible good can come to humanity
from a religion specifically devised to
advance the personal aims/fortunes of
the most murderous/immoral cutthroat
criminal in human history?... [Mohammed]

What other nation on this earth would have
the resolve for this most important task of
all? What other people? [except the Jews]

A world of nations has already surrendered
their doomed peoples to the sword of Islam
and are now Islam's impoverished slaves:
Muslim immigration into Europe is mind-
numbing in its lack of logic, because the
immigrants claim theirs is a journey to
improve their economic lives while at the
same time insisting on imposing upon "their
new countries" the very cultural cause of
their old countries' economic devastation!

Geert Wilders, who is demanding a halt to
immigration from Muslim countries as the
centerpiece of his campaign for the Dutch
prime ministership, has hailed Israel for
fighting Islam's jihad of doom/death/destruction
and warned that “the West is next” if Israel
is unsuccessful: “Israel is the canary in the
coal mine,” Wilders said in a recent telephone
interview with The Jerusalem Post, ahead of
Wednesday’s elections in the Netherlands.
“The jihad against Israel isn’t against Israel
only. It’s against the whole West.” Adding:
“Parents everywhere in the West sleep well
at night because parents in Israel lie awake
at night because their children are fighting
the jihad. You’re fighting our fight,” he said.
“And after Israel, we are next.”

S D Rodrian

All religions are local.
Only science is universal.

What God Said To Mohammed
(Other SDR Posts)

"Why can't we now find/Google some of these posts
where they were originally posted?" Because they have
been censured, banned, removed there... excised on
the unpredictable whims of predictably spineless editors
--In other words, "No matter what they may tell you:
Free speech will ALWAYS be edited." Meaning that the
struggle for (genuinely) free speech is universal & will
be without an end in sight for as long as there are men
in this world.


Those who deny the Holocaust are contemptible.
Those who deny them the right to deny it (and their
enablers) are merely denying "the contemptible"
the opportunity to reveal themselves.

Embarrassment and shame are things you inflict on
yourself: The Truth ought never to embarrass or
shame us. And a provocation is only as good as those
who are provoked. As a child I too felt the sting of
shame and embarrassment... until I finally realized
that those infantile taunts were merely pathetic
attempts by pathetic persons to raise themselves by
trying to lower others... and that all such taunts are
either to be pitied, or ridiculed--if you are as small
as they (or like as not to sport with the nitwits).

The liar's worst punishment is to have his lie
unmasked. The Holocaust is historically undeniable:
Those who deny it might as well deny mathematics,
biology, and all the sciences... they might as well
deny the existence of things in front of their very
eyes. And prove by that their folly (which is yet
something akin to their unwittingly acknowledging
the Holocaust, strange to tell).

Just what sort of people are Holocaust deniers, then?
Certainly people worthy only of contempt or pity, or
of both: Such persons want to inspire hate in us, and
they have succeeded if they do (as we would have
surely failed ourselves).

S D Rodrian                      return 1


Rabbi Shmuley: How Jewish Values Enrich The Earth
On Marriage
An Open Letter To President Obama On The Trayvon Martin Affair.